Logic question
 

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check
the headers for ID spoofers who don't)"
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk


as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US
economy

You're partly correct.

Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff,
Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common?

i boat in NJ. i live in PA...

Logic question
 

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check
the headers for ID spoofers who don't)"
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk


as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US
economy

You're partly correct.

Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff,
Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common?

i boat in NJ. i live in PA...



Is this your way of saying "I don't know". Google it you fool.

--
The OBAMA motto: We've got what it takes, to take what you've got!

Logic question
 

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:



. the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that
focused on the rich

There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

really? care to refute? got any data?

no...i thought not.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t...

Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm..
actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy.

ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and
also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter


I don't blame you for trying to deflect. So what about the data? It
proves you wrong.

gee the link is busted. is that your data?



"With this in mind, the Tax Policy Center, a division of the liberal
Brookings Institution, published a report on July 29 that included
Treasury Department estimates of tax revenue losses that would
accompany an extension of Bush's cuts."

ah. so in lieu of data, just toss out that, instead of begging the
question and accepting far right mythology, anything that questions
right wing fairy tales is 'liberal'

uh huh.


"Inside the accompanying PDF was evidence the Left and their media
minions have been misrepresenting the beneficiaries of these cuts for
a very long time:"

"According to Treasury, the total ten-year cost of completely
extending the Bush tax cuts is $3.675 trillion. The ten-year cost
exclusively associated with extending tax cuts to folks Obama, the
Democrats, and the media consider rich is $679 billion."

ah. 'the media'? like fox news? the wall street journal?


"This means that almost $3 trillion of the cost associated with the
Bush tax cuts over the next ten years, or 82 percent, is not for
benefits to the so-called rich."


well let's see...the middle class guy earning 50K gets a 1.4% tax cut.
the millionaire making 1M gets a 3% tax cut

so, unless you can't count, it seems you're full of ****...again...

Logic question
 

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:56:56 -0400, "Harry"
wrote:

"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check
the headers for ID spoofers who don't)"
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk


as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US
economy

You're partly correct.

Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff,
Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common?

i boat in NJ. i live in PA...



Is this your way of saying "I don't know". Google it you fool.

it's also my way of saying i dont care

Logic question
 

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check
the headers for ID spoofers who don't)"
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk


as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US
economy
You're partly correct.

Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff,
Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common?

i boat in NJ. i live in PA...



Ah, thanks for the explanation.


--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Logic question
 

On Aug 13, 11:55*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

. the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that
focused on the rich

There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

really? care to refute? got any data?

no...i thought not.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t....

Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm..
actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy.

ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and
also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter

I don't blame you for trying to deflect. *So what about the data? *It
proves you wrong.

gee the link is busted. is that your data?

It worked in the original post, but of course you didn't look at it...
that would require you learn something new.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...s-favored-rich

Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. You may, with hard work,
overcome your many deficiencies.

Logic question
 

On Aug 13, 1:05*pm, Jack wrote:
On Aug 13, 11:55*am, bpuharic wrote:





On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

. the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that
focused on the rich

There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

really? care to refute? got any data?

no...i thought not.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t...

Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm..
actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy.

ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and
also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter

I don't blame you for trying to deflect. *So what about the data? *It
proves you wrong.

gee the link is busted. is that your data?

It worked in the original post, but of course you didn't look at it...
that would require you learn something new.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t...

Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. *You may, with hard work,
overcome your many deficiencies.

Crickets, of course.

Logic question
 

On 8/13/10 9:14 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 13, 1:05 pm, wrote:
On Aug 13, 11:55 am, wrote:





On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 13, 10:20 am, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

. the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that
focused on the rich

There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

really? care to refute? got any data?

no...i thought not.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t...

Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. Hmm..
actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. Enjoy.

ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and
also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter

I don't blame you for trying to deflect. So what about the data? It
proves you wrong.

gee the link is busted. is that your data?

It worked in the original post, but of course you didn't look at it...
that would require you learn something new.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t...

Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. You may, with hard work,
overcome your many deficiencies.

Crickets, of course.


Newsbusters is a right-wing, trashy, propaganda site. It is part of the
CNS news family of conservative bull****.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Logic question
 

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:05:44 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

h

Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. You may, with hard work,
overcome your many deficiencies.


guess you missed the part that the rich get a 3.8% tax cut

the middle class? 1.5%.

this is why the economy collapsed. the middle class gets zip. we cant
spend because the weatlhy keep taking more and more.

try looking at the figures yourself. a guy making 50K gets 772 in tax
cuts. a person making a million gets far far more.

Logic question
 

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:09:14 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:55:36 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

well let's see...the middle class guy earning 50K gets a 1.4% tax cut.
the millionaire making 1M gets a 3% tax cut

If that is a middle class family with kids they got twice as good a
deal.

sorry sport. i compare apples to apples.

If you want proof, just let the whole package expire, across the board
and see who bitches the loudest. I bet your taxes go up. I know mine
will.

yep they will go up. but they're going up anyhow. the wealthy will see
to that. you dont think they're ever going to pay their fair share, do
you?

I still think that may be the best option if you really think the
Clinton era was so great.
I notice you didn't get a raise then either. It was great for that guy
with the $6000 umbrella stand tho. Bush put him in jail.

nope i didnt get a raise. me and the entire middle class

but the right ignores THAT little bit of fact