|
Logic question
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On 11-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US economy |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 12:24*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:36:07 -0400, "Harry" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Aug 11, 5:17 pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...s-favored-rich Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. Enjoy. well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! *How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? *They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! ROFLMAO!! that's EXACTLY MY POINT YOU MORON!! Your idea of making a point is to state the obvious? Is your brain pickled or are you on drugs? |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 12:23*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 11, 5:17*pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 11, 6:09*am, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. "Myth #1: The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts wiped out the $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011. Fact: They caused just 14 percent of the swing from projected surpluses to actual deficits. well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... got any data of your own? oh. you dont figures "As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle- class, and upper-middle class in this country. " Read mo http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB |
Logic question
In article ,
says... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Don, Don, you little typo ferret, where ARE you??? -- The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get |
Logic question
In article ,
says... "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Must be something in the water......... wait a minute, most of the dopers in here don't go near the water..... not even for a monthly bath. Oh, little buddy, that made you look SO stupid! The title of the post has the word "logic" in it and you come up with that?? -- The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get |
Logic question
In article ,
says... On 8/12/10 6:35 PM, YukonBound wrote: "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Must be something in the water......... wait a minute, most of the dopers in here don't go near the water..... not even for a monthly bath. Speaking of the really stupid, I wonder how Little Man Freak's day went at his non-existent webhosting ISP. Come on, my bow-legged little pet, I've tried to get you to stop this nonsense, it makes you look dumber than a post. -- The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 13, 12:24*am, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:36:07 -0400, "Harry" wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...s-favored-rich Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter that's why i know conservatism is a learning disability. you guys wrecked this country now you're weeping because you can't blame it on anyone else well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! *How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? *They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! ROFLMAO!! that's EXACTLY MY POINT YOU MORON!! Your idea of making a point is to state the obvious? Is your brain pickled or are you on drugs? it's so obvious you can't understand it. the essence of conservatism |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 13, 12:24*am, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:36:07 -0400, "Harry" wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t... Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter I don't blame you for trying to deflect. So what about the data? It proves you wrong. "With this in mind, the Tax Policy Center, a division of the liberal Brookings Institution, published a report on July 29 that included Treasury Department estimates of tax revenue losses that would accompany an extension of Bush's cuts." "Inside the accompanying PDF was evidence the Left and their media minions have been misrepresenting the beneficiaries of these cuts for a very long time:" "According to Treasury, the total ten-year cost of completely extending the Bush tax cuts is $3.675 trillion. The ten-year cost exclusively associated with extending tax cuts to folks Obama, the Democrats, and the media consider rich is $679 billion." "This means that almost $3 trillion of the cost associated with the Bush tax cuts over the next ten years, or 82 percent, is not for benefits to the so-called rich." "As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle- class, and upper-middle class in this country." It would seem that the one with a learning disability is you. |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:05:49 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 13, 12:23*am, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... got any data of your own? oh. you dont figures "As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle- class, and upper-middle class in this country. " WTF?? uh...which has NOTHING to do with the FACT the bush tax cuts raped the economy and caused our MASSIVE deficits and the biggest benefit to the bush tax cuts went to the wealthy http://www.factcheck.org/here_we_go_...rates_tax.html a 50K couple with no kids got a 1.5% tax cut. a million dollar guy got 3.8% so your right wing bull**** is just another pile of steaming fresh manure the wealthy ALWAYS rape the middle class under the GOP and the wealthy ALWAYS get the right wing to bull**** how god meant this to be so. Read mo http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com