|
Logic question
25 million American unemployed. At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! Obama lining rich peoples bird cages with solid gold and diamond plates? Me thinks bankruptcy of the USD is coming. -- Is government working for you, or are you working for the government? |
Logic question
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: 25 million American unemployed. At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. Obama lining rich peoples bird cages with solid gold and diamond plates? yeah. i suppose that's why he imposed regulations on wall street that the GOP fought...and the GOP is fighting to preserve tax cuts for the rich even though we have to BORROW money to pay for them |
Logic question
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: 25 million American unemployed. At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. Why do you keep bringing up Obama's race? |
Logic question
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 11, 6:09*am, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. "Myth #1: The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts wiped out the $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011. Fact: They caused just 14 percent of the swing from projected surpluses to actual deficits. well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 yeah. i suppose that's why he imposed regulations on wall street that the GOP fought...and the GOP is fighting to preserve tax cuts for the rich even though we have to BORROW money to pay for them " Most Senate Republicans voted against the measure, saying it doesn’t go far enough to prevent future taxpayer-funded bailouts of Wall Street firms and creates thinecessary new bureaucracy in the consumer bureau .. the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich when the economy was destroyed by the rich and their CDO's...as revenues plummeted due to middle class wage earners losing their jobs...the bush tax cuts became the largest single factor in the deficit and the fact is the GOP didn't like the bill because it DID regulate wall street...the GOP being in favor of no regulations...a failed view of economics in fact, shortly before the vote on the bill, GOP leaders met with the CEO's of the largest financial houses http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...042003323.html so your pravda like view of reality doesn't tell the full story. and the protection bureau? when has the GOP EVER passed a bill to protect the middle class? OF COURSE they oppose it! they're fundamentalist free marketers...even though the DATA shows their view is WRONG “There is little in this legislation that will fundamentally change the way that Wall Street does business,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington. “There is probably no economist who believes that this bill will end the risks of too-big-to- fail financial institutions. The six largest banks will still enjoy the enormous implicit subsidy that results from the expectation that the federal government will bail them out in the event of a crisis.” well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by 1. banning proprietary trading 2. forcing banks to write a 'living will' so that the govt can bust 'em up if they start to fail The tax cuts have little to do with the deficit. No meaningful regulations, and the republicans wanted more. Do you really believe the crap you write? really? where's your evidence? because i just posted mine WHERE IS YOUR DATA? all you have is GOP mouthpieces telling us how wonderful wall street did for the economy in the last 3 years. |
Logic question
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:27:27 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 8/11/2010 1:08 PM, Harry @ news.east.earthlink.net wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: 25 million American unemployed. At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. Why do you keep bringing up Obama's race? bpuharic thinks you shouldn't be critical of Obama because he is black. To me, that makes bpuharic racist. canuck thinks blaming a black president for the civil war is OK because he's black but canuck isn't racist, you see... |
Logic question
On 8/11/2010 1:08 PM, Harry @ news.east.earthlink.net wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: 25 million American unemployed. At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. Why do you keep bringing up Obama's race? bpuharic thinks you shouldn't be critical of Obama because he is black. To me, that makes bpuharic racist. -- Is government working for you, or are you working for the government? |
Logic question
wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:09:43 -0400, bpuharic wrote: the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. People always blame the president for everything that happens during his presidency. White or black. Nice to see some reasoned, intelligent comments here once in a while. Liberals who constantly complain about criticism of Obama's policies with the excuse that the criticism is *because he is black* are as much a racist as some nutcases on the far right. |
Logic question
On 11-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. |
Logic question
On Aug 11, 5:17*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 11, 6:09*am, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. "Myth #1: The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts wiped out the $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011. Fact: They caused just 14 percent of the swing from projected surpluses to actual deficits. well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. The CBPP? The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! I've learned one thing... one should never argue with a clinically certifiable crazy person on usenet. Hope you find your shift key. |
Logic question
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Aug 11, 5:17 pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 11, 6:09 am, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. "Myth #1: The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts wiped out the $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011. Fact: They caused just 14 percent of the swing from projected surpluses to actual deficits. well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. The CBPP? The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! I've learned one thing... one should never argue with a clinically certifiable crazy person on usenet. Hope you find your shift key. He should be drummed out of the ARRL. He's giving them such a bad name. -- The OBAMA motto: We've got what it takes, to take what you've got! |
Logic question
|
Logic question
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On 11-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! |
Logic question
On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote:
"I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? |
Logic question
"Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Must be something in the water......... wait a minute, most of the dopers in here don't go near the water..... not even for a monthly bath. |
Logic question
On 8/12/10 6:35 PM, YukonBound wrote:
"Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Must be something in the water......... wait a minute, most of the dopers in here don't go near the water..... not even for a monthly bath. Speaking of the really stupid, I wonder how Little Man Freak's day went at his non-existent webhosting ISP. |
Logic question
"Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 6:35 PM, YukonBound wrote: "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Must be something in the water......... wait a minute, most of the dopers in here don't go near the water..... not even for a monthly bath. Speaking of the really stupid, I wonder how Little Man Freak's day went at his non-existent webhosting ISP. Terri probably puts him in a corner and lets him answer the phone on occasion..... as long as he passes all questions directly to her. |
Logic question
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 11, 5:17*pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 11, 6:09*am, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. "Myth #1: The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts wiped out the $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011. Fact: They caused just 14 percent of the swing from projected surpluses to actual deficits. well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. The CBPP? The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... got any data of your own? oh. you dont figures . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! I've learned one thing... one should never argue with a clinically certifiable crazy person on usenet. Hope you find your shift key. |
Logic question
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:36:07 -0400, "Harry"
wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Aug 11, 5:17 pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. The CBPP? The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! ROFLMAO!! that's EXACTLY MY POINT YOU MORON!! being a conservative is a learning disability |
Logic question
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:51:22 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote: On 11-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote: the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... you guys...always crying wolf |
Logic question
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On 11-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US economy |
Logic question
bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On 11-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US economy You're partly correct. Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff, Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common? |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 12:24*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:36:07 -0400, "Harry" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Aug 11, 5:17 pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...s-favored-rich Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. Enjoy. well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! *How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? *They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! ROFLMAO!! that's EXACTLY MY POINT YOU MORON!! Your idea of making a point is to state the obvious? Is your brain pickled or are you on drugs? |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 12:23*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 11, 5:17*pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 11, 6:09*am, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:28:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. "Myth #1: The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts wiped out the $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002–2011. Fact: They caused just 14 percent of the swing from projected surpluses to actual deficits. well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... got any data of your own? oh. you dont figures "As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle- class, and upper-middle class in this country. " Read mo http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB |
Logic question
In article ,
says... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Don, Don, you little typo ferret, where ARE you??? -- The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get |
Logic question
In article ,
says... "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Must be something in the water......... wait a minute, most of the dopers in here don't go near the water..... not even for a monthly bath. Oh, little buddy, that made you look SO stupid! The title of the post has the word "logic" in it and you come up with that?? -- The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get |
Logic question
In article ,
says... On 8/12/10 6:35 PM, YukonBound wrote: "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote in message m... On 8/12/10 3:38 PM, mmc wrote: "I am wrote in message ... In , says... On 11-Aug-2010, wrote: At least $1.6 trillion debt spend this year. (but some say more is actual) That is $64,000 per unemployed person. Where is the money really going? I mean this seriously! As Obama does this for 4 years, that is more than a quarter million dollars per unemployed!!! it's the racist assumption that obama has something to do with this that's risible. obama is, hopefully, doing the responsible things; re-regulating wall street (done); allowing some of the bush giveaways to the rich to expire (biggest factor in the deficit), etc. the racist right just thinks the darkie pres is responsible. "Thinking like that by a significant percentage of U.S. inhabitants is why the former U.S. is just around the corner from the economic might of Somalian ghettos. Like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis............... Voting should require an intelligence test. Naw, all we would really have to do is stop the huge percentage of voter fraud support and paid for by George Soros and the DNC... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! How about mandatory voter education and the death penalty for elected liars and crooks? This would retroactive for lies told and under the table bribes taken while campaigning. And this would be for all politicians Bob!!! No free ride for any race!!! Yet another rec.boats brain sturgeon, eh? Must be something in the water......... wait a minute, most of the dopers in here don't go near the water..... not even for a monthly bath. Speaking of the really stupid, I wonder how Little Man Freak's day went at his non-existent webhosting ISP. Come on, my bow-legged little pet, I've tried to get you to stop this nonsense, it makes you look dumber than a post. -- The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 13, 12:24*am, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:36:07 -0400, "Harry" wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...s-favored-rich Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter that's why i know conservatism is a learning disability. you guys wrecked this country now you're weeping because you can't blame it on anyone else well it seems you're missing the point. the point is not that this bill will prevent PAST abuses..but FUTURE ones. it does so by And we arrive at the real problem... you're retarded!! *How could one ever prevent "past" abuses? *They are... drum roll please... in the PAST!! ROFLMAO!! that's EXACTLY MY POINT YOU MORON!! Your idea of making a point is to state the obvious? Is your brain pickled or are you on drugs? it's so obvious you can't understand it. the essence of conservatism |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 13, 12:24*am, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:36:07 -0400, "Harry" wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t... Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter I don't blame you for trying to deflect. So what about the data? It proves you wrong. "With this in mind, the Tax Policy Center, a division of the liberal Brookings Institution, published a report on July 29 that included Treasury Department estimates of tax revenue losses that would accompany an extension of Bush's cuts." "Inside the accompanying PDF was evidence the Left and their media minions have been misrepresenting the beneficiaries of these cuts for a very long time:" "According to Treasury, the total ten-year cost of completely extending the Bush tax cuts is $3.675 trillion. The ten-year cost exclusively associated with extending tax cuts to folks Obama, the Democrats, and the media consider rich is $679 billion." "This means that almost $3 trillion of the cost associated with the Bush tax cuts over the next ten years, or 82 percent, is not for benefits to the so-called rich." "As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle- class, and upper-middle class in this country." It would seem that the one with a learning disability is you. |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:05:49 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 13, 12:23*am, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: well no. when the economy tanked they were responsible for the fact that the deficit was as large as it was. they are the single largest factor in the deficit http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036 Umm, NO. *The CBPP? *The one funded by the Democracy Alliance, the liberal crackpot organization? *Honestly Bob, if you're not even gonna try... got any data of your own? oh. you dont figures "As such, despite what the Left and their media minions have been claiming, 82 percent of the Bush tax cuts benefited the poor, middle- class, and upper-middle class in this country. " WTF?? uh...which has NOTHING to do with the FACT the bush tax cuts raped the economy and caused our MASSIVE deficits and the biggest benefit to the bush tax cuts went to the wealthy http://www.factcheck.org/here_we_go_...rates_tax.html a 50K couple with no kids got a 1.5% tax cut. a million dollar guy got 3.8% so your right wing bull**** is just another pile of steaming fresh manure the wealthy ALWAYS rape the middle class under the GOP and the wealthy ALWAYS get the right wing to bull**** how god meant this to be so. Read mo http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check
the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US economy You're partly correct. Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff, Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common? i boat in NJ. i live in PA... |
Logic question
"bpuharic" wrote in message
... On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US economy You're partly correct. Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff, Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common? i boat in NJ. i live in PA... Is this your way of saying "I don't know". Google it you fool. -- The OBAMA motto: We've got what it takes, to take what you've got! |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t... Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter I don't blame you for trying to deflect. So what about the data? It proves you wrong. gee the link is busted. is that your data? "With this in mind, the Tax Policy Center, a division of the liberal Brookings Institution, published a report on July 29 that included Treasury Department estimates of tax revenue losses that would accompany an extension of Bush's cuts." ah. so in lieu of data, just toss out that, instead of begging the question and accepting far right mythology, anything that questions right wing fairy tales is 'liberal' uh huh. "Inside the accompanying PDF was evidence the Left and their media minions have been misrepresenting the beneficiaries of these cuts for a very long time:" "According to Treasury, the total ten-year cost of completely extending the Bush tax cuts is $3.675 trillion. The ten-year cost exclusively associated with extending tax cuts to folks Obama, the Democrats, and the media consider rich is $679 billion." ah. 'the media'? like fox news? the wall street journal? "This means that almost $3 trillion of the cost associated with the Bush tax cuts over the next ten years, or 82 percent, is not for benefits to the so-called rich." well let's see...the middle class guy earning 50K gets a 1.4% tax cut. the millionaire making 1M gets a 3% tax cut so, unless you can't count, it seems you're full of ****...again... |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:56:56 -0400, "Harry"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US economy You're partly correct. Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff, Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common? i boat in NJ. i live in PA... Is this your way of saying "I don't know". Google it you fool. it's also my way of saying i dont care |
Logic question
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:23:47 -0400, "Harry (I post with a Mac, check the headers for ID spoofers who don't)" wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:50:54 -0400, I am Tosk as opposed to wall street which did such great things for the US economy You're partly correct. Since you live in NJ you should know this. What do Bernie Madoff, Solomon Dwek, and Eliyahu Weinstein have in common? i boat in NJ. i live in PA... Ah, thanks for the explanation. -- I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID. |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 11:55*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t.... Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter I don't blame you for trying to deflect. *So what about the data? *It proves you wrong. gee the link is busted. is that your data? It worked in the original post, but of course you didn't look at it... that would require you learn something new. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...s-favored-rich Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. You may, with hard work, overcome your many deficiencies. |
Logic question
On Aug 13, 1:05*pm, Jack wrote:
On Aug 13, 11:55*am, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Aug 13, 10:20*am, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t... Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. *Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. *Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter I don't blame you for trying to deflect. *So what about the data? *It proves you wrong. gee the link is busted. is that your data? It worked in the original post, but of course you didn't look at it... that would require you learn something new. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t... Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. *You may, with hard work, overcome your many deficiencies. Crickets, of course. |
Logic question
On 8/13/10 9:14 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 13, 1:05 pm, wrote: On Aug 13, 11:55 am, wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Aug 13, 10:20 am, wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT), wrote: . the fact is the GOP congress in 2001 and 2003 passed tax cuts that focused on the rich There you go again... repeating a lie doesn't make it true. really? care to refute? got any data? no...i thought not. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t... Try reading something other than your liberal propaganda. Hmm.. actually, this is from one of your liberal sources. Enjoy. ROFLMAO!! i read national review online every day, for a laugh, and also subscribe to the 'weekly spectator' newsletter I don't blame you for trying to deflect. So what about the data? It proves you wrong. gee the link is busted. is that your data? It worked in the original post, but of course you didn't look at it... that would require you learn something new. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...iberal-think-t... Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. You may, with hard work, overcome your many deficiencies. Crickets, of course. Newsbusters is a right-wing, trashy, propaganda site. It is part of the CNS news family of conservative bull****. -- I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows. If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID. |
Logic question
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:05:44 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: h Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. You may, with hard work, overcome your many deficiencies. guess you missed the part that the rich get a 3.8% tax cut the middle class? 1.5%. this is why the economy collapsed. the middle class gets zip. we cant spend because the weatlhy keep taking more and more. try looking at the figures yourself. a guy making 50K gets 772 in tax cuts. a person making a million gets far far more. |
Logic question
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com