Logic question
 

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

On Aug 25, 9:37*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:



this is why the economy collapsed. the middle class gets zip. we cant
spend because the weatlhy keep taking more and more.

try looking at the figures yourself. *a guy making 50K gets 772 in tax
cuts. a person making a million gets far far more.

Wrong. *The family making 50k got a 48% reduction in taxes. *All of
the other giveaways are phased out by the time you hit $200k or so.
You just don't want to see (or are incapable of seeing?) the big
picture. *But you are a good parrot of the liberal lies.

nope. the numbers don't lie. why not post 'em here? or are you too
busy makin' 'em up to bother?

the GOP has never proposed a tax cut that didnt favor the rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here you go liar...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB


which has NOTHING to do with the FACT a 50K wage earner gets 1.5% of
his income back in taxes

and a guy with a 1M income gets almost 4%.

oh well. guess you dont read your own references


Read, get informed, grow a spine and start telling the truth even if
it doesn't fit your self indulgent, progressive agenda...

Logic question
 

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:


On Aug 25, 9:37 pm, wrote:

On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:




this is why the economy collapsed. the middle class gets zip. we cant
spend because the weatlhy keep taking more and more.


try looking at the figures yourself. a guy making 50K gets 772 in tax
cuts. a person making a million gets far far more.


Wrong. The family making 50k got a 48% reduction in taxes. All of
the other giveaways are phased out by the time you hit $200k or so.
You just don't want to see (or are incapable of seeing?) the big
picture. But you are a good parrot of the liberal lies.

nope. the numbers don't lie. why not post 'em here? or are you too
busy makin' 'em up to bother?

the GOP has never proposed a tax cut that didnt favor the rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here you go liar...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB


which has NOTHING to do with the FACT a 50K wage earner gets 1.5% of
his income back in taxes

and a guy with a 1M income gets almost 4%.

oh well. guess you dont read your own references



Can you explain how people get a percentage of their earnings "back in
taxes"? That is just bizarre.

Logic question
 

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:03:37 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:




nope. the numbers don't lie. why not post 'em here? or are you too
busy makin' 'em up to bother?

the GOP has never proposed a tax cut that didnt favor the rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Here you go liar...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB


which has NOTHING to do with the FACT a 50K wage earner gets 1.5% of
his income back in taxes

and a guy with a 1M income gets almost 4%.

oh well. guess you dont read your own references



Can you explain how people get a percentage of their earnings "back in
taxes"? That is just bizarre.


too complicated for you? tax cut isn't understandable?


It's not too complicated. It doesn't make any sense.