Logic question
 

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:27:46 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 18, 7:46*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:20:54 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 18, 7:12*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:04:37 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 18, 6:45*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 18, 5:56*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, *wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? *From YOUR OWN LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. *Deranged. *Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of understanding it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. *Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. *You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. *Please don't stop!

i love it. he can't read so complains when others can.

*your own data proves your statements wrong*

Priceless!!!

OK let's do this the hard way.

how do you calculate an average?

the population is men and women.

the output is average wages.

go ahead. show us how to calculate this

There you go, trying to move the goalpost again.

Here's the issue being discussed...

You wrote:
??WTF? can you read? no one said...and no reference says...there has
been a DECREASE in dual income families. in addition to being stupid
are you illiterate?

and I wrote and quoted"
Except your own link:
"While household income has *increased*, its growth has been slowed
by a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have two
earners and, therefore, higher incomes.

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to
have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN LINK!!


See, bob? You are WRONG again!!

IOW you think EVERYONE in the middle class is in a household

hmmm...seems you left out ALOT of people.

oh well...time for you to phone up rush and whimper that you failed
again

Logic question
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 6:45 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 18, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to
have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN
LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of understanding
it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. Please don't stop!

You find train wrecks funny?
You're one weird goofball.

Logic question
 

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:27:46 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote:

On Aug 18, 7:46*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:20:54 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 18, 7:12*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:04:37 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 18, 6:45*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 18, 5:56*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, *wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? *From YOUR OWN LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. *Deranged. *Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of understanding it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. *Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. *You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. *Please don't stop!

i love it. he can't read so complains when others can.

*your own data proves your statements wrong*

Priceless!!!

OK let's do this the hard way.

how do you calculate an average?

the population is men and women.

the output is average wages.

go ahead. show us how to calculate this

There you go, trying to move the goalpost again.

Here's the issue being discussed...

You wrote:
??WTF? can you read? no one said...and no reference says...there has
been a DECREASE in dual income families. in addition to being stupid
are you illiterate?

and I wrote and quoted"
Except your own link:
"While household income has *increased*, its growth has been slowed
by a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have two
earners and, therefore, higher incomes.

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to
have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN LINK!!


See, bob? You are WRONG again!!

I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point. Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.
--

John H

Logic question
 

On 8/18/10 10:38 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 6:45 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 18, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend
to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN
LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of
understanding it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. Please don't stop!

You find train wrecks funny?
You're one weird goofball.

He is just another right wing POS.

When are you heading up to the Yukon?

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Logic question
 

"John H" wrote in message
...

I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point.
Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob doesn't
read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.
--

John H


Don't attempt to "think".
It's not your strong suit!

Logic question
 

"Harry " wrote in message
...
On 8/18/10 10:38 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 6:45 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 18, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend
to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN
LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of
understanding it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. Please don't stop!

You find train wrecks funny?
You're one weird goofball.

He is just another right wing POS.

When are you heading up to the Yukon?

--

More like 'out to the Yukon'..... refers to my boat, a Princecraft Yukon

Logic question
 

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"John H" wrote in message
...

I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point.
Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob doesn't
read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.
--

John H


Don't attempt to "think".
It's not your strong suit!

Look who's talking. snerk

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Logic question
 

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
...
On 8/18/10 10:38 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 6:45 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 18, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend
to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN
LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of
understanding it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. Please don't stop!

You find train wrecks funny?
You're one weird goofball.

He is just another right wing POS.

When are you heading up to the Yukon?

--

More like 'out to the Yukon'..... refers to my boat, a Princecraft Yukon

Ahhh! Such a noble craft.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

Logic question
 

YukonBound wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...

I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a
point. Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob
doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.
--

John H


Don't attempt to "think".
It's not your strong suit!
You stole that line from me, dummy.

Logic question
 

YukonBound wrote:


"Harry " wrote in message
...
On 8/18/10 10:38 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Jack" wrote in message
...

On Aug 18, 6:45 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack

wrote:





On Aug 18, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend
to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN
LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of
understanding it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. Please don't stop!

You find train wrecks funny?
You're one weird goofball.

He is just another right wing POS.

When are you heading up to the Yukon?

--

More like 'out to the Yukon'..... refers to my boat, a Princecraft Yukon
Say what?