On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:14:44 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 7-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Irrelevant now, the middle class is history. Learn to live like the
people
in Peru. They don't produce anything either.

that happens when the plutocrats take over...you know...the guys you
love

Your rulers are all within D.C.

really? george bush lives in DC? cheney lives in DC?

, and they're getting ready to tell you they
will help you, with another $300 bucks which you'll pay taxes on. There IS
an alternative! You could start an institute to study the sexual
preferences of homosexual transvestite albino Haitian frogs - there's money
to be made there!

It must suck to be hopelessly screwed.

yeah it does. the middle class always gets it in the shorts and,
unfortunately, keeps voting right wing

On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:07:09 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 7-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Too bad you're not part of this great country... you're a loser.

Good thing I'm not part of your FORMERLY great country...

yeah you right wingers really destroyed this place

You're right. The "right wingers" (the productive minority)

HHAHAHAHAAH....prodictive minority!! we have a middle class that's
being destroyed by the american right and you call them PRODUCTIVE??

should have
behaved like the bed wetters - buy everything foreign,

you keep complaining about buying foreign yet refuse to even admit the
american middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 37 years, wh ile the
germans, with their export driven economy AND strong labor unions, are
eating our lunch


Natural selection always perseveres - that's why you and your spawn have no
future.

yeah, me and 100M members of the middle classs

On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:01:54 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 7-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

i knew we were screwed when the dumb ******* reagon got elected

Yeah Carter was doing such a great job.

gee. democrats provably make more money for the middle class. the GOP
screws us

http://www.bukisa.com/articles/31485...nd-republicans

but you right wingers continue to live in your bubbles

As long as the mindless losers play the D vs R vs D vs R vs D you will be no
more than you are now - pawns of the ruling politicians that treat you like
barnyard animals you are, to be harvested. Divide and conquer - the public
mindlessly rants about 2 slimeball political syndicates, and you ignore the
most basic essentials of an effective economic system. This has been going
on for decades - it's in-place better now than ever.

funny that the right wing keeps telling us about all the 'rules'
without acknowledging they put in power the people who destroyed this
country.

and if you knew anything about the american political process, you'd
know what a 'first past the post' system is...which is our system...

and why it's screwed us



Why is the U.S. being lowered into the grave? Your rulers are doing fine,
you are taking it in the ass,

yep, courtesy of the american right

and rant that another crime syndicate will
save your unproductive ass. They won't. Stop being a parasite, produce, or
don't eat, move under a bridge -

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

you will not be getting more handouts from
the productive minority. Whichever political crime syndicate you kiss the
asses of will NEVER make a difference. You could, but you're too lazy, and
indoctrinated into thinking your rulers will "help" you. Hhahahahaa -
you're really screwed, and because of your own actions. That's called
natural selection.

got anything else besides cliches, aphorisms, and tales from aunt
minnie?

Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 7-Sep-2010, wrote:


i knew we were screwed when the dumb ******* reagon got elected

Yeah Carter was doing such a great job.

The job growth under the Reagan administration was an average of 2.1% per
year. Comparing the recovery from the 1981-82 recession (1983-1990) with
the
years between 1971 (end of a recession) and 1980 shows that the rate of
growth of real GDP per capita averaged 2.77 under Reagan and 2.50% under
Nixon, Ford and Carter. However, the unemployment rate averaged higher
under
Reagan (6.75% vs. 6.35%), while the average productivity growth was slower

under Reagan (1.38% vs. 1.92%), and private investment as a percentage of
GDP also averaged lower under Reagan (16.08% vs. 16.86%). Furthermore,
real
wages declined sharply during the Reagan Presidency.[39]

Why do so many losers think a president controls "the economy?"

That's as stupid as an Obama sticker on a Toyota, and there's LOTS of those.

The dumb bitch was too lazy to remove the [39] from her plagiarism? The
alleged attorney lacks the ethics to cite her lame source.

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:45:31 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 7-Sep-2010, wrote:


If you deserved or even extorted through union coercion one additional
penny
you would have gotten that penny. You didn't. You took the little you had
and sent it to Japan and China.

there are no unions in the US. the right wing destroyed them. THAT'S
why we have had no increases in wages here even though the rich have
had a 500% increase in income.

you right wingers continue to destroy the middle class all the while
bitchin about how we continue to survive

Are you drunk, stupid, or both? Other than demanding and begging, what have
you ever built? Which company? What development or invention? Oh......just
"I deserve it!" That's why 3rd world countries are eating your lunch.
Losers and the gimmee gimmee crowd are no longer rewarded. THAT's why you
are screwed. Open a company, produce something, or get happy with your
minimum (and declining) wage.

where's your evidence?

i'm a scientist. i posted the EVIDENCE that the midcle class hasn't
had a pay increase in 37 years while the richest 1% have had a 500%
increase in that time

where's your evidence?

bull**** you have in spades.

where's your evidence?


Scientist? Did you go to Yale?

On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:23:17 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:45:31 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 7-Sep-2

where's your evidence?

i'm a scientist. i posted the EVIDENCE that the midcle class hasn't
had a pay increase in 37 years while the richest 1% have had a 500%
increase in that time

where's your evidence?

bull**** you have in spades.

where's your evidence?


Scientist? Did you go to Yale?

why? did you go to jale?

"Larry" wrote in message
...
Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 7-Sep-2010, wrote:


i knew we were screwed when the dumb ******* reagon got elected

Yeah Carter was doing such a great job.

The job growth under the Reagan administration was an average of 2.1%
per
year. Comparing the recovery from the 1981-82 recession (1983-1990) with
the
years between 1971 (end of a recession) and 1980 shows that the rate of
growth of real GDP per capita averaged 2.77 under Reagan and 2.50% under
Nixon, Ford and Carter. However, the unemployment rate averaged higher
under
Reagan (6.75% vs. 6.35%), while the average productivity growth was
slower

under Reagan (1.38% vs. 1.92%), and private investment as a percentage
of
GDP also averaged lower under Reagan (16.08% vs. 16.86%). Furthermore,
real
wages declined sharply during the Reagan Presidency.[39]

Why do so many losers think a president controls "the economy?"

That's as stupid as an Obama sticker on a Toyota, and there's LOTS of
those.

The dumb bitch was too lazy to remove the [39] from her plagiarism? The
alleged attorney lacks the ethics to cite her lame source.

The liar/misogynist/racist is just too dumb.

On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:07:32 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
m...
Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 7-Sep-2010, wrote:


under Reagan (1.38% vs. 1.92%), and private investment as a percentage
of
GDP also averaged lower under Reagan (16.08% vs. 16.86%). Furthermore,
real
wages declined sharply during the Reagan Presidency.[39]

Why do so many losers think a president controls "the economy?"

That's as stupid as an Obama sticker on a Toyota, and there's LOTS of
those.

The dumb bitch was too lazy to remove the [39] from her plagiarism? The
alleged attorney lacks the ethics to cite her lame source.

The liar/misogynist/racist is just too dumb.

he seems to hate all human beings

which is why he loves himself

On 8-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

That's why 3rd world countries are eating your lunch.
Losers and the gimmee gimmee crowd are no longer rewarded. THAT's why
you
are screwed. Open a company, produce something, or get happy with your
minimum (and declining) wage.

where's your evidence?

i'm a scientist. i posted the EVIDENCE that the midcle class hasn't
had a pay increase in 37 years while the richest 1% have had a 500%
increase in that time

where's your evidence?

bull**** you have in spades.

where's your evidence?

It would be obvious to an earthworm that "the richest" (fiscal penis envy)
did something productive; you have not. I've been explaining to dimwits
since the late 70's what you and tens of millions more are doing. It's
always someone else's fault - it is, it's the ignorant masses voting habits
and purchasing habits. There is no limited pool of funds - it's flexible
and grows in concert with output. Output is automobiles, steel, electronics,
tools and dies, machinery is DEAD.

Manual labor is not in demand, too much competition from illiterate illegals
in the U.S. and from overseas capitalist countries. It's not solely your
fault, there are a hundred million who have made it all possible.

Read this - just one of millions of examples of why you're screwed:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...prss=rss_print
In light of this, millions of "Americans" will waddle off and send their
declining wages to red China while saying "...what else can I do, I have no
choice..."

My only point is that ONLY the masses can change the trend by REFUSING to
send money (and their employment - they are thoroughly linked) overseas.
The masses won't participate, it's over. Move on. Or move to a place of
better opportunity.

On 8-Sep-2010, Larry wrote:

i'm a scientist. i posted the EVIDENCE that the midcle class hasn't
had a pay increase in 37 years while the richest 1% have had a 500%
increase in that time

where's your evidence?

bull**** you have in spades.

where's your evidence?


Scientist? Did you go to Yale?

He probably meant Scientologist - he's waiting for the mother ship.