In article ,
says...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:

On 02/08/2010 6:46 AM, W1TEF wrote:
"With no carbon monoxide, it's the only car that will prevent the
owner's suicide attempt it will inevitably cause."

http://www.slate.com/id/2262229/pagenum/all/

Especially since you could get a Tata Nano for $under $3000, the
interest alone on the difference would pay for the gas as the Nano gets
more than 50 mpg, A/C works too on the $3500 model, as well a s heat.
Even European crash rated.

GM, like the Volt, too expensive and too screwed up to be economically
viable.

But at GM, they keep sucking those tax dollars. Obama style, can you
say charge it to the taxpayer?

Volt/GM is insanity.

Here's what we need more of...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDF2E...layer_embedded
--

John H

Couple people in my neighbourhood drive electric 'Vespa type' scooters.
Weird.. they pass by without a sound. These models seem a bit low powered,
and the owners drive like little old ladies on Sunday.

Must be like driving a RAV4

"Harry?" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 02/08/2010 6:46 AM, W1TEF wrote:
"With no carbon monoxide, it's the only car that will prevent the
owner's suicide attempt it will inevitably cause."

http://www.slate.com/id/2262229/pagenum/all/

Especially since you could get a Tata Nano for $under $3000, the
interest alone on the difference would pay for the gas as the Nano gets
more than 50 mpg, A/C works too on the $3500 model, as well a s heat.
Even European crash rated.

GM, like the Volt, too expensive and too screwed up to be economically
viable.

But at GM, they keep sucking those tax dollars. Obama style, can you
say charge it to the taxpayer?

Volt/GM is insanity.

Here's what we need more of...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDF2E...layer_embedded
--

John H

Couple people in my neighbourhood drive electric 'Vespa type' scooters.
Weird.. they pass by without a sound. These models seem a bit low
powered,
and the owners drive like little old ladies on Sunday.

Must be like driving a RAV4

A RAV4 is quite peppy and agile since the 2009 model year. The 6 cyl
version would blow the doors off whatever polluting clunker you drive
around.

"Harry?" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 02/08/2010 6:46 AM, W1TEF wrote:
"With no carbon monoxide, it's the only car that will prevent the
owner's suicide attempt it will inevitably cause."

http://www.slate.com/id/2262229/pagenum/all/

Especially since you could get a Tata Nano for $under $3000, the
interest alone on the difference would pay for the gas as the Nano gets
more than 50 mpg, A/C works too on the $3500 model, as well a s heat.
Even European crash rated.

GM, like the Volt, too expensive and too screwed up to be economically
viable.

But at GM, they keep sucking those tax dollars. Obama style, can you
say charge it to the taxpayer?

Volt/GM is insanity.

Here's what we need more of...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDF2E...layer_embedded
--

John H

Couple people in my neighbourhood drive electric 'Vespa type' scooters.
Weird.. they pass by without a sound. These models seem a bit low
powered,
and the owners drive like little old ladies on Sunday.

Must be like driving a RAV4


I'd show you a picture of me riding my little red Schwinn electric scooter,
but you'd laugh your asses off so I won't.

On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 02/08/2010 6:46 AM, W1TEF wrote:
"With no carbon monoxide, it's the only car that will prevent the
owner's suicide attempt it will inevitably cause."

http://www.slate.com/id/2262229/pagenum/all/

Especially since you could get a Tata Nano for $under $3000, the
interest alone on the difference would pay for the gas as the Nano gets
more than 50 mpg, A/C works too on the $3500 model, as well a s heat.
Even European crash rated.

GM, like the Volt, too expensive and too screwed up to be economically
viable.

But at GM, they keep sucking those tax dollars. Obama style, can you
say charge it to the taxpayer?

rather strange in that GM's market capitalization is almost break even

oh. the right wing doesnt follow the news....they get the party line
from rush



Volt/GM is insanity.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 02/08/2010 6:46 AM, W1TEF wrote:
"With no carbon monoxide, it's the only car that will prevent the
owner's suicide attempt it will inevitably cause."

http://www.slate.com/id/2262229/pagenum/all/

Especially since you could get a Tata Nano for $under $3000, the
interest alone on the difference would pay for the gas as the Nano gets
more than 50 mpg, A/C works too on the $3500 model, as well a s heat.
Even European crash rated.

GM, like the Volt, too expensive and too screwed up to be economically
viable.

But at GM, they keep sucking those tax dollars. Obama style, can you
say charge it to the taxpayer?

rather strange in that GM's market capitalization is almost break even

oh. the right wing doesnt follow the news....they get the party line
from rush



Volt/GM is insanity.


You must not read the news either. GMs market cap is zero.

On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:17:35 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

rather strange in that GM's market capitalization is almost break even

oh. the right wing doesnt follow the news....they get the party line
from rush



Volt/GM is insanity.


You must not read the news either. GMs market cap is zero.

really? oh. rush didn't give you the weekly lie.


http://money.cnn.com/2010/06/15/news...tune/index.htm

Eric Selle, a debt analyst at JPMorgan, has calculated that investors
might support a GM market capitalization of somewhere between $70
billion and $90 billion, potentially providing the US government with
a tidy profit


so....you're wrong...AGAIN!!!

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:17:35 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

rather strange in that GM's market capitalization is almost break even

oh. the right wing doesnt follow the news....they get the party line
from rush



Volt/GM is insanity.


You must not read the news either. GMs market cap is zero.

really? oh. rush didn't give you the weekly lie.


http://money.cnn.com/2010/06/15/news...tune/index.htm

Eric Selle, a debt analyst at JPMorgan, has calculated that investors
might support a GM market capitalization of somewhere between $70
billion and $90 billion, potentially providing the US government with
a tidy profit


so....you're wrong...AGAIN!!!


"MIGHT support a GM market capitalization"

No, I'm not wrong. You stated the market cap "is". That means at the
present time. Gotta have an IPO first...but you knew that.

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:17:35 -0400, wrote:



wrote in message
...

On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:58:40 -0600,
wrote:

rather strange in that GM's market capitalization is almost break even

oh. the right wing doesnt follow the news....they get the party line
from rush



Volt/GM is insanity.


You must not read the news either. GMs market cap is zero.

really? oh. rush didn't give you the weekly lie.


http://money.cnn.com/2010/06/15/news...tune/index.htm

Eric Selle, a debt analyst at JPMorgan, has calculated that investors
might support a GM market capitalization of somewhere between $70
billion and $90 billion, potentially providing the US government with
a tidy profit


so....you're wrong...AGAIN!!!


"might support"? You base your statements on conjecture?

BTW - Eric Selle is not middle class! He's an evil man who applied
himself, worked hard, and became wealthy!