On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:09:37 -0400, "Charles C."
wrote:






The paper value of those investments right now is about four to five times
the initial investment, despite the meltdown of 2008. I suppose I could
complain that without the meltdown the stock values would be much higher,
but I don't regard that as loses. Loses would mean the value of the
investments today are less than the original deposit into the account.

what they represent is a loss of time. if you're 20 you have no
problem. in the next 40 years you'll be OK

if, however, you're a baby boomer, well that's a different story


CC


So, in other words, I should be screaming and bitching about the "loss" of
money that I never earned or had. I see. Starting to understand how the
left thinks.

go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens


CC

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."
wrote:



wrote in message
...

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:09:37 -0400, "Charles C."
wrote:






The paper value of those investments right now is about four to five times
the initial investment, despite the meltdown of 2008. I suppose I could
complain that without the meltdown the stock values would be much higher,
but I don't regard that as loses. Loses would mean the value of the
investments today are less than the original deposit into the account.

what they represent is a loss of time. if you're 20 you have no
problem. in the next 40 years you'll be OK

if, however, you're a baby boomer, well that's a different story


CC


So, in other words, I should be screaming and bitching about the "loss" of
money that I never earned or had. I see. Starting to understand how the
left thinks.

go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens


CC

When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:06:17 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."
wrote:


if, however, you're a baby boomer, well that's a different story


CC


So, in other words, I should be screaming and bitching about the "loss" of
money that I never earned or had. I see. Starting to understand how the
left thinks.

go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens


CC

When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:06:17 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."
wrote:


if, however, you're a baby boomer, well that's a different story


CC


So, in other words, I should be screaming and bitching about the "loss"
of
money that I never earned or had. I see. Starting to understand how
the
left thinks.

go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens


CC

When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see


I may be wrong but I believe 401Ks are untouchable in bankruptcy
proceedings. You may have to list them on a loan app but they are
untouchable to a loan holder.

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:27:41 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:06:17 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."


go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens


CC

When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see


I may be wrong but I believe 401Ks are untouchable in bankruptcy
proceedings. You may have to list them on a loan app but they are
untouchable to a loan holder.


unless, of course, you're able to waive that...which many middle class
people did since it was a source of wealth that the rich wanted to get
their greedy hands on.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:27:41 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:06:17 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."


go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens


CC

When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see


I may be wrong but I believe 401Ks are untouchable in bankruptcy
proceedings. You may have to list them on a loan app but they are
untouchable to a loan holder.


unless, of course, you're able to waive that...which many middle class
people did since it was a source of wealth that the rich wanted to get
their greedy hands on.

If you could not afford the loan without your 401k money, buy a cheaper
house. There was no way, anyone making $50k a year could purchase a $500k
house. Maybe you were too dumb to realize that. And the only reason the
banks etc. were loaning money on that ratio was the government told them to
and bought the loans from them. The reason I own a million dollar house is
because of inflation. No way should my house be selling for a $1,000,000+
but that is what inflation and the government has brought us. Was a $36k
house in 1972. With a 450 addition and a pool which probably cost $5,500 to
build in 1974 the house would have valued at about $40k then. Now it is 25
times that value 36 years later. Way more than CPI indexed inflation and
that has been the measure for increased home value for all but the last 30
years.

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:57:46 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:27:41 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see


I may be wrong but I believe 401Ks are untouchable in bankruptcy
proceedings. You may have to list them on a loan app but they are
untouchable to a loan holder.


unless, of course, you're able to waive that...which many middle class
people did since it was a source of wealth that the rich wanted to get
their greedy hands on.

If you could not afford the loan without your 401k money, buy a cheaper
house.

yeah i can see you're a renter and never bought a house

it doesnt matter whether or not you're usin it as collateral. the loan
company STILL wants to know what y our assets are

they SELL your loan to investors. the more assets you have, the better
your loan is and the more money they get for it.

There was no way, anyone making $50k a year could purchase a $500k
house. Maybe you were too dumb to realize that.

and you're too dumb to apply for a mortgage


And the only reason the
banks etc. were loaning money on that ratio was the government told them to
and bought the loans from them.

more bull****. the govt never told them **** about the loans they had
to cover. wall street got greedy and set up loan companies to make bad
loans so they could package them, sell CDO's and clean up

there's a reason CDO's went from 1 trillion in 97 to SIXTY TWO
TRILLION in 2007

greed of the rich. it had NOTHING to do with the middle class

the middle class, having had static wages for 10 years, did the only
thing it could: borrowed.

The reason I own a million dollar house is
because of inflation. No way should my house be selling for a $1,000,000+
but that is what inflation and the government has brought us. Was a $36k
house in 1972. With a 450 addition and a pool which probably cost $5,500 to
build in 1974 the house would have valued at about $40k then. Now it is 25
times that value 36 years later. Way more than CPI indexed inflation and
that has been the measure for increased home value for all but the last 30
years.

you dont know **** about anything, let alone the middle class

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:27:41 -0400, wrote:


wrote in message
...

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:06:17 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."



go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens



CC


When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see


I may be wrong but I believe 401Ks are untouchable in bankruptcy
proceedings. You may have to list them on a loan app but they are
untouchable to a loan holder.


unless, of course, you're able to waive that...which many middle class
people did since it was a source of wealth that the rich wanted to get
their greedy hands on.

WTF?

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:11:33 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:27:41 -0400, wrote:



When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see


I may be wrong but I believe 401Ks are untouchable in bankruptcy
proceedings. You may have to list them on a loan app but they are
untouchable to a loan holder.


unless, of course, you're able to waive that...which many middle class
people did since it was a source of wealth that the rich wanted to get
their greedy hands on.

WTF?

because you can sign an agreeement to give them access to your 401K. i
didnt have to because my credit score is VERY high...but it's an
option

but you're living at motel 6 so you're unaware of this

On 21/07/2010 4:15 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:27:41 -0400, wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:06:17 -0400, wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:58 -0400, "Charles C."


go ahead and try to get a loan using your 401K as collateral

see what happens


CC

When would any lender accept a 401K account as collateral?

since it's a standard part of a loan applcation. that's when

been renting all your life, i see


I may be wrong but I believe 401Ks are untouchable in bankruptcy
proceedings. You may have to list them on a loan app but they are
untouchable to a loan holder.


unless, of course, you're able to waive that...which many middle class
people did since it was a source of wealth that the rich wanted to get
their greedy hands on.

No, you mean the envious greedy slugs like yourself and de-fumer.

--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?