ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 18/07/2010 9:00 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:51:17 -0600, wrote: On 18/07/2010 12:16 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:49:21 -0400, wrote: fine. when you become 100M middle class americans, you be sure and let me know, OK? again...the question: which 401K funds manager...magellan, shearson, chase, etc...is doing better today than in 2006? go ahead. take your time I guess you don't have the right mondset. Money is attracted to those who know how to manage it. if that's true why has the US economy collapsed. you mean to tell me there's NO ONE in the US who knows how to mamage money?? you sure are stupid Simple, US government and peoples hit the tipping point where they no longer attract money. There is only so much corruption, bailout and entitlement a system can stand before the tipping point is reached. -- Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common sense? Yes, you are simple. Amoeba like. |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On 20/07/2010 3:03 AM, Charles C. wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:09:37 -0400, "Charles C." wrote: I am curious. How much of the 14 trillion lost on Wall Street represents real money loses and not paper loses. I have very modest investments in the stock market that I started in 1999. and the difference is? 'paper' losses are real losses representing a loss in equity and a loss in the ability to extend further investments Not a 401k. Just small investments that I manage myself. Don't spend much time watching them. Not a day trader type. The paper value of those investments right now is about four to five times the initial investment, despite the meltdown of 2008. I suppose I could complain that without the meltdown the stock values would be much higher, but I don't regard that as loses. Loses would mean the value of the investments today are less than the original deposit into the account. what they represent is a loss of time. if you're 20 you have no problem. in the next 40 years you'll be OK if, however, you're a baby boomer, well that's a different story CC So, in other words, I should be screaming and bitching about the "loss" of money that I never earned or had. I see. Starting to understand how the left thinks. CC Can the left think? -- Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common sense? |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:04:59 -0400, Larry wrote:
John H wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:10:30 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:46:34 -0400, "Harold" wrote: http://screen.yahoo.com/funds.html and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO idea which ones these are going to be. Move your $40 to a money market fund and STFU. You'd think all the Limo Liberals here would get up a collection for poor bpuharic notice how the right ignores the situation facing the middle class? the rich are doing fine...so that's all that matters Seriously, Bob, do you really think all the conservatives here, or anywhere, are rich? Do you not think a bunch of us might be middle class? Yet you are the one doing all the whining because you paid little attention to your investment. I asked if your 401K had a money market fund. By putting your money in same, you could have prevented the losses you took. Don't they all? If he has/had a company match - it would be free money, too! I've noticed he won't answer a straightforward question. -- John H |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:33:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 19/07/2010 5:23 PM, Larry wrote: Canuck57 wrote: If stupid is making money at, especailly when others loose it, well, I guess them I am pretty darned stupid. Dollar cost averaging is a great thing right now for retirement money if you still have 10+ years to go. Obama won't be around forever - he's a one-term President. I would ahve to agree. Obama is leading the longest depression in modern times, his head is on the block and clearly Obamanomics is failing. canuck hates the black guy in the white house. he's too stupid to realize the depression started in 2007. obama wasn't president but to the right wing, that's irrelevant. he still gets blamed. after all, bush was white. and you can't blame a white guy if a black guy is available |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:37:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 18/07/2010 11:23 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:02:54 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:00:52 -0400, wrote: yah. they're called wall street hedge fund managers. they're doing fine. middle class america? still getting screwed I have done quite well with my middle class income and the markets, no one gives a **** about you. there are 100,000,000 americans who arent you you right whiners are obsessed with yourselves. you're greedy, self absorbed and insular....which is why you're too stupid to know about what's happened in the US in the last 10 years quite good actually as the democrats created a create buying oppotunity by trashing the US federal economics. the GOP deregulated the hell out of the economy. it's fre market fundamentalism leading to wall street socialism courtesy of the right Just because you invest in dogs does not mean everyone did. tell it to america's middle class...which you admit you despise |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:31:47 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 18/07/2010 9:00 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:51:17 -0600, wrote: . Money is attracted to those who know how to manage it. if that's true why has the US economy collapsed. you mean to tell me there's NO ONE in the US who knows how to mamage money?? you sure are stupid Simple, US government and peoples hit the tipping point where they no longer attract money. i love it when the right wing is wrong.... money is flowing to the US from europe. the euro is dying... he is SSSOOOO Stupid... There is only so much corruption, bailout and entitlement a system can stand before the tipping point is reached. yeah. wall street socialism is kiling the middle class |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:59:01 -0400, Larry wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:37:27 -0400, wrote: Certain income funds are just as productive as money market funds. The NAV will vary - even drop for a while, but you are adding shares through reinvested dividends. IOW buy low sell high who cudda guessed. Evidently you didn't. sorry sport. the right lied. the middle class died |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:42:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 20/07/2010 4:59 PM, Larry wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:37:27 -0400, wrote: Certain income funds are just as productive as money market funds. The NAV will vary - even drop for a while, but you are adding shares through reinvested dividends. IOW buy low sell high who cudda guessed. Evidently you didn't. Stupid too, one of my faves was buying Ford for under $2.25 and selling at over $6.75, I know, could have held out for $11 but never got burned taking profit. notice how the right calls every single hard working american an idiot? bpuharic probably just wet his pants when the market was giving hot deals. he's too stupid to know that, 5 years ago the wealth of all US households was 65B today it's 55B to the right, little fairy tales and emotions take the place of hard headed reason and logic |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
|
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:47:37 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 20/07/2010 3:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:47:48 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:08:45 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:39:08 -0400, wrote: ahem. let's see....the number of economists predicting this collapse was about 5. That may be right but "economists" are largely idiots from what I have seen. now THAT is true... Thee were plenty of hedge fund managers who saw this coming. Ever hear of the Goldman Sachs thing? I know for a fact Andy Hannigan at Centex Homes knew this was coming as early as 2q07. They were pulling back by then. and there as many HF managers who saw this coming as economists The earliest predictor I know of was Ron Paul, circa 2002 to 2004. when he wasnt advocating gassing jews... I listened and I watched. Huge reason that by 2004 I was well in the swing of moving out of US equity and USDs. Going from 90% in US at 2002 to 12% in 2007. Saved me a lot of losses. i wonder what else you listened to ron paul say... know many jews? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com