ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

"Harry wrote in message
...

On 7/23/10 8:16 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:08:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He
can't keep printing money forever.

You're truly stupid. The fact is that Bush lowered taxes for no damn
good
reason, and they were already at historic lows. This isn't sustainable.
Even
a moron like you should know that. Keep blaming Obama for all your
troubles,
but they're definitely self-made.


Bush lowered taxes because that was what they thought you did to
stimulate the economy. The Dow did go over 11,000 and a lot of people
thought they were rich enough to buy a couple of McMansions, so it may
have done something.
As we are now demonstrating, it was an across the board tax cut that
you agree helps the bottom.

Do you disagree that every tax hike is "across the board"? Really, if a
"rich guy" is making a million dollars a year and paying a quarter
million in taxes, next year he has to pay half a million in taxes, do
you doubt that he will find a way to increase his bottom line (coming
directly out of everyones pocket) to make up for it? When the price of
Widgets goes up, who pays the difference, only the rich? No, it's you
and me, and proportionally, we pay more than the so called "rich"...


You have no job and no income. You pay nothing in federal income tax.

You appear to be a stalker Krowsie.

I make and pay more than our resident pedophile, Harry. I have offered
several times to match tax returns to prove it, but he won't. Can you
guess why??? ;)


Another lie? Do I win?

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote:



Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He
can't keep printing money forever.


actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from
bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit.

but he's black...

You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person.

Or Ninc de Poop in drag.
--

John H

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:07:06 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:33:50 -0400, wrote:

i'm NOT comparing I(middle class) to I(rich)

i'm comparing

dI(middle class)/dt to dI(rich)/dt

wihich shows the middle class have grabbed every freakin' dime for
themselves and STARVED the middle class

WTF?

typo...the rich have grabbed...

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:09:12 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:42:07 -0400, wrote:




gee. too bad most m iddle class americans will have to work 'til
they're 70


Not if they applied themselves, worked hard, and saved money.

ROFLMAO!! so it's the middle class's fault??

HAHAHAHAHA!!


How dumb are you? You talk about the middle class as if everyone in it
were the same. They're not, dip****.

the term 'middle class' has a definition. i'm proud to be middle
class. but the rich, of course, wont let us stay here...

mexico, here we come...

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:11:18 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:39:16 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:03:06 -0400, wrote:



and what makes you think loan officers arent interested in money?



I said, and I know I misspelled a word, that I realize that they can be
liquidated. They are still of not interest to a loan officer as
collateral. I'm quite bright. I have a large 401K/IRA. You,
apparently don't.


so you say. the average 401K is less than 50K.

mine's bigger.

and so is my 401K

I'm far behind you in retirement age yet I have a large 401K/IRA. I
know that bothers you. If you knew how much you might kill yourself.

hey the fact you're rich bothers me not at all. good luck

but when you're my age...watch your ass. wall street's gonna look at
your 401K and decide it's too good for you to keep.

bye bye!!

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:12:57 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:09:36 -0400, wrote:




Who is giving the rich money? Obama wants to give the losers *our* money.

correct. because we h ave no choice

but it's time to pass a few bux to the mddle class


So why should the middle class, or anyone, hand over hard earned money
to the losers who choose not to work or get an education?

notice how the right HATES the middle class?? they consider just and
decent wages a form of welfare

to them, the middle class should be starved to death.

izzat right, henry?

oh...by the by...how do you have a healthy economy w/o a middle class?

the right wing just doesnt think these things through

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote:



Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He
can't keep printing money forever.


actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from
bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit.

but he's black...

You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person.

did you have to lift your hood to type that?

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:14:09 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote:



Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He
can't keep printing money forever.


actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from
bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit.

but he's black...

You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person.

Or Ninc de Poop in drag.


you boys burn the cross yet?

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:28:52 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:04:49 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


gee. is that why the germans have such a competiive economy even
though thier workforce is heavily unionize? and the US has no
unions...

and what protection do companies need from unions? unions have NO
power at all. none.

corporations run the govt.

let's see...who destroyed wall street...corporations like lehman bros
or unions??

You can't really compare the US to Germany. Their whole culture is
different. They are far more conservative than the US. To start with
their debt ratio is far lower, personal and government.

really? i guess that's why they have so many unions

because they're conservative


HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:32:02 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:06:18 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

If you have ever had OSHA show up at your site you know they are far
from toothless.

let's see...BP kills 15 workers 3 years ago.

consequence? none. a business deductible fine. BFD.


Policemen and firemen get killed all the time and they have some of
the strongest unions in the country. Your point?

surely you jest

and dont call me shirley