BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/116600-ah-yes-latest-my-company-401k.html)

Larry[_25_] July 25th 10 03:00 AM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:12:57 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:09:36 -0400, wrote:





Who is giving the rich money? Obama wants to give the losers *our* money.


correct. because we h ave no choice

but it's time to pass a few bux to the mddle class



So why should the middle class, or anyone, hand over hard earned money
to the losers who choose not to work or get an education?

notice how the right HATES the middle class?? they consider just and
decent wages a form of welfare

to them, the middle class should be starved to death.

izzat right, henry?

oh...by the by...how do you have a healthy economy w/o a middle class?

the right wing just doesnt think these things through


You are out of your mind. Try reading the post that you are responding to.

Larry[_25_] July 25th 10 03:01 AM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote:




Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He
can't keep printing money forever.


actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from
bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit.

but he's black...


You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person.

did you have to lift your hood to type that?

Again...WTF?

bpuharic July 25th 10 03:11 AM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:00:52 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:12:57 -0400, wrote:



Who is giving the rich money? Obama wants to give the losers *our* money.


correct. because we h ave no choice

but it's time to pass a few bux to the mddle class



So why should the middle class, or anyone, hand over hard earned money
to the losers who choose not to work or get an education?

notice how the right HATES the middle class?? they consider just and
decent wages a form of welfare

to them, the middle class should be starved to death.

izzat right, henry?

oh...by the by...how do you have a healthy economy w/o a middle class?

the right wing just doesnt think these things through


You are out of your mind. Try reading the post that you are responding to.


i did. he called the middel class losers.

that seems to be the theme for the upcoming political debate on taxex.
we already have sharron angle and others telling us the unemployed are
just lazy, worthless losers, but that the rich deserve tax cuts

the right hates the middle class

bpuharic July 25th 10 03:11 AM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:01:24 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote:




Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He
can't keep printing money forever.


actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from
bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit.

but he's black...


You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person.

did you have to lift your hood to type that?

Again...WTF?


keeps going over your head...you just can't believe the right is
racist

Larry[_25_] July 25th 10 03:42 AM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:01:24 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, wrote:



bpuharic wrote:


On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote:





Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He
can't keep printing money forever.



actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from
bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit.

but he's black...



You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person.


did you have to lift your hood to type that?


Again...WTF?

keeps going over your head...you just can't believe the right is
racist

That type of hood? Again, you are as wrong as you are dumb.

Califbill July 25th 10 05:57 AM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:09:20 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:37:25 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


gee...is it a change in the middle class OR a change in the policies
of wall street. well, let's look at evideence, shall we?

1997 CDO's 1 trillion
2007 62 TRILLION

yeah i'm sure the middle class had a BIG role in that...

US houselhod wealth 2005 65 trillion
2009 55 trillion

so tell me how the middle class caused this.

you're such an idiot.


No, you are the idiot. Always been a percentage of middle class on the
verge of financial trouble or in financial trouble


what's amazing is that this SKYROCKETED in the last 3 years...and wall
street, according to you, had nothing to do with it!

the rich are good. greed is good. greed purifies and clarifies...

or is that gordon gecko? I get you guys mixed up.



Older daughter and
son in law, got caught somewhat. Sold good, solid dividend paying stock
and
went 100% dot.com. Lost most of the money


he just jabbers on about the family...not following the news, you see.
he swills his cheap beer, listens to rush tell him everything's OK and
just ignores the news...

tell you what. try reading some news websites, OK? why not let me
know what shape the economy is in...courtesy of your rich buddies on
wall street.


Number one, I do not drink much and 2nd never cheap beer.



bpuharic July 25th 10 10:49 AM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:45:09 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 22/07/2010 8:12 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:43:12 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


i'm not 100M americans who are in the same boat. you right wingers
hate the middle class so jus ignore EVERYONE in the middle class is
having the same problems

admitting this would blow your fuses. so you just ignore it


You are destined to be poor and certainly hopelessly stupid.


which means i'll be a great candidate for GOP office


Harry  July 25th 10 04:51 PM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
On 7/25/10 11:41 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:13:42 -0400, wrote:

gee. the germans have a world class export based economy that's
HEAVILY unionized.

the US, with NO unions, is not.



Yeah, and such powerful unions they are.
This union factory worker makes $22,000 a year and the government
taxes more than half of that away for things like his "free" health
care.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...M&refer=europe


What's *your* solution for providing workers who don't earn tons of
money a good health care and retirement program?

Wayne.B July 25th 10 05:36 PM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:51:02 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

What's *your* solution for providing workers who don't earn tons of
money a good health care and retirement program?


And what is your rationale for believing that they have an inalienable
right to either ?

Traditionally good health care and good retirement plans were fringe
benefits that employers used to attract and retain a top notch labor
force. When did that become a "right" ? I find nothing in the
constitution. Our ancestors grew up and proliferated without these
"rights". How did they manage? Perhaps by being productive and
thrifty?

Harry  July 25th 10 05:48 PM

ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
 
On 7/25/10 12:36 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:51:02 -0400, Harry
wrote:

What's *your* solution for providing workers who don't earn tons of
money a good health care and retirement program?


And what is your rationale for believing that they have an inalienable
right to either ?

Traditionally good health care and good retirement plans were fringe
benefits that employers used to attract and retain a top notch labor
force. When did that become a "right" ? I find nothing in the
constitution. Our ancestors grew up and proliferated without these
"rights". How did they manage? Perhaps by being productive and
thrifty?



My rationale is that they are fellow human beings, and therefore are
entitled as an inalienable right to good health care and a reasonable
retirement after a lifetime of working, *even if* they never earn enough
money to do so on their own.

The "I find nothing in the Constitution" is a vacuous argument. As a
nation, we do many things and undertake many activities that are not
strictly or even loosely defined in the Constitution.

What do you expect the working poor to do, w'hine, to help you hang onto
more of your dollars? Get sick and die? Miss an entire day of work to
sit in a hospital ER for a flu shot? Live in a cardboard box when they
are pushed out of their job and there aren't any more jobs?

Be productive and thrifty is a wonderful aphorism for a time when such
made a better life possible for workers trying to claw a step or two up
the ladder. Nowadays, it takes to incomes to support even a small family.








All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com