![]() |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:12:57 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:09:36 -0400, wrote: Who is giving the rich money? Obama wants to give the losers *our* money. correct. because we h ave no choice but it's time to pass a few bux to the mddle class So why should the middle class, or anyone, hand over hard earned money to the losers who choose not to work or get an education? notice how the right HATES the middle class?? they consider just and decent wages a form of welfare to them, the middle class should be starved to death. izzat right, henry? oh...by the by...how do you have a healthy economy w/o a middle class? the right wing just doesnt think these things through You are out of your mind. Try reading the post that you are responding to. |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote: Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He can't keep printing money forever. actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit. but he's black... You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person. did you have to lift your hood to type that? Again...WTF? |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:00:52 -0400, Larry wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:12:57 -0400, wrote: Who is giving the rich money? Obama wants to give the losers *our* money. correct. because we h ave no choice but it's time to pass a few bux to the mddle class So why should the middle class, or anyone, hand over hard earned money to the losers who choose not to work or get an education? notice how the right HATES the middle class?? they consider just and decent wages a form of welfare to them, the middle class should be starved to death. izzat right, henry? oh...by the by...how do you have a healthy economy w/o a middle class? the right wing just doesnt think these things through You are out of your mind. Try reading the post that you are responding to. i did. he called the middel class losers. that seems to be the theme for the upcoming political debate on taxex. we already have sharron angle and others telling us the unemployed are just lazy, worthless losers, but that the rich deserve tax cuts the right hates the middle class |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:01:24 -0400, Larry wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote: Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He can't keep printing money forever. actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit. but he's black... You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person. did you have to lift your hood to type that? Again...WTF? keeps going over your head...you just can't believe the right is racist |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:01:24 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:15:24 -0400, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:47 -0400, wrote: Yup. Obama's off-the-chart spending will certainly increase taxes. He can't keep printing money forever. actually it's bush. obama's first year budget was a carry over from bush. and it had a 9% GDP deficit. but he's black... You are nothing but a ****ing troll or a remarkably dumb person. did you have to lift your hood to type that? Again...WTF? keeps going over your head...you just can't believe the right is racist That type of hood? Again, you are as wrong as you are dumb. |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:09:20 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:37:25 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: gee...is it a change in the middle class OR a change in the policies of wall street. well, let's look at evideence, shall we? 1997 CDO's 1 trillion 2007 62 TRILLION yeah i'm sure the middle class had a BIG role in that... US houselhod wealth 2005 65 trillion 2009 55 trillion so tell me how the middle class caused this. you're such an idiot. No, you are the idiot. Always been a percentage of middle class on the verge of financial trouble or in financial trouble what's amazing is that this SKYROCKETED in the last 3 years...and wall street, according to you, had nothing to do with it! the rich are good. greed is good. greed purifies and clarifies... or is that gordon gecko? I get you guys mixed up. Older daughter and son in law, got caught somewhat. Sold good, solid dividend paying stock and went 100% dot.com. Lost most of the money he just jabbers on about the family...not following the news, you see. he swills his cheap beer, listens to rush tell him everything's OK and just ignores the news... tell you what. try reading some news websites, OK? why not let me know what shape the economy is in...courtesy of your rich buddies on wall street. Number one, I do not drink much and 2nd never cheap beer. |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:45:09 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 22/07/2010 8:12 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:43:12 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: i'm not 100M americans who are in the same boat. you right wingers hate the middle class so jus ignore EVERYONE in the middle class is having the same problems admitting this would blow your fuses. so you just ignore it You are destined to be poor and certainly hopelessly stupid. which means i'll be a great candidate for GOP office |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:51:02 -0400, Harry ?
wrote: What's *your* solution for providing workers who don't earn tons of money a good health care and retirement program? And what is your rationale for believing that they have an inalienable right to either ? Traditionally good health care and good retirement plans were fringe benefits that employers used to attract and retain a top notch labor force. When did that become a "right" ? I find nothing in the constitution. Our ancestors grew up and proliferated without these "rights". How did they manage? Perhaps by being productive and thrifty? |
ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K
On 7/25/10 12:36 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:51:02 -0400, Harry wrote: What's *your* solution for providing workers who don't earn tons of money a good health care and retirement program? And what is your rationale for believing that they have an inalienable right to either ? Traditionally good health care and good retirement plans were fringe benefits that employers used to attract and retain a top notch labor force. When did that become a "right" ? I find nothing in the constitution. Our ancestors grew up and proliferated without these "rights". How did they manage? Perhaps by being productive and thrifty? My rationale is that they are fellow human beings, and therefore are entitled as an inalienable right to good health care and a reasonable retirement after a lifetime of working, *even if* they never earn enough money to do so on their own. The "I find nothing in the Constitution" is a vacuous argument. As a nation, we do many things and undertake many activities that are not strictly or even loosely defined in the Constitution. What do you expect the working poor to do, w'hine, to help you hang onto more of your dollars? Get sick and die? Miss an entire day of work to sit in a hospital ER for a flu shot? Live in a cardboard box when they are pushed out of their job and there aren't any more jobs? Be productive and thrifty is a wonderful aphorism for a time when such made a better life possible for workers trying to claw a step or two up the ladder. Nowadays, it takes to incomes to support even a small family. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com