Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The discussion of hauling in an anchor reminded me of something I have
been thinking of for a couple of years, continuous furling of a normal mainsail without replacing the main or the boom. This means that small modifications could be made to a main so it could be raised any amount and pulled from fully raised to any extent. Current reefing systems are mostly incremental using one to three reefing levels (reef points). There are in-mast furlers which I do not like because they can fail with the main up and because they do not allow for battens and there are in-boom furlers that require a special boom. What I want to develop is a simple add-on to a boom allowing any main to be continuously reefed. Pulling down on the luff (the part of the sail against the mast) is not too complex but the leech side (the outer edge of the sail) also needs to be pulled down and the point from which it is pulled varies as the sail is pulled down to the boom. One can imagine an attachment to the luff puller to allow this. Both of these would require some sort of reinforcing on the luff and leech to allow it to be gripped by the puller. However, reefing systems need to also grip the sail along its bottom edge. This is done on most boats by the reef points where the sail gets tied around the boom. I have not yet figured out a way to do this or even if it is necessary. Frogwatch |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT), Katie Ohara
wrote: The discussion of hauling in an anchor reminded me of something I have been thinking of for a couple of years, continuous furling of a normal mainsail without replacing the main or the boom. This means that small modifications could be made to a main so it could be raised any amount and pulled from fully raised to any extent. Current reefing systems are mostly incremental using one to three reefing levels (reef points). There are in-mast furlers which I do not like because they can fail with the main up and because they do not allow for battens and there are in-boom furlers that require a special boom. What I want to develop is a simple add-on to a boom allowing any main to be continuously reefed. Pulling down on the luff (the part of the sail against the mast) is not too complex but the leech side (the outer edge of the sail) also needs to be pulled down and the point from which it is pulled varies as the sail is pulled down to the boom. One can imagine an attachment to the luff puller to allow this. Both of these would require some sort of reinforcing on the luff and leech to allow it to be gripped by the puller. However, reefing systems need to also grip the sail along its bottom edge. This is done on most boats by the reef points where the sail gets tied around the boom. I have not yet figured out a way to do this or even if it is necessary. Back in the late 60s/early 70s, roller reefing was all the rage. The boom was typically fitted out with a geared crank mechanism which would actually roll up the mainsail around the boom. This seemed like a great idea on paper but in actual practice had some serious limitations: Sail shape was terrible in the rolled configuration because of insufficient/non-existent outhaul tension; fixed boom vangs were impossible; and the mainsheet had to be led to the aft end of the boom by necessity. The geared crank mechanism was also awkward to use, subject to failure, and required someone to go forward to the mast to operate it. All of this led to the widespread adoption of slab reefing or "jiffy reefing" by the late 70s. This had the advantage of maintaining outhaul/foot tension, and if rigged properly, could be done mostly from the cockpit. Not directly related to reefing, but becoming a very popular mainsail management technique, is the so called "stack pack" system which utilizes something called lazy jacks to guide the sail back on to the top of the boom when it is dropped. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 23, 10:24*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT), Katie Ohara wrote: The discussion of hauling in an anchor reminded me of something I have been thinking of for a couple of years, continuous furling of a normal mainsail without replacing the main or the boom. *This means that small modifications could be made to a main so it could be raised any amount and *pulled from fully raised to any extent. *Current reefing systems are mostly incremental using one to three reefing levels (reef points). *There are in-mast furlers which I do not like because they can fail with the main up and because they do not allow for battens and there are in-boom furlers that require a special boom. *What I want to develop is a simple add-on to a boom allowing any main to be continuously reefed. Pulling down on the luff (the part of the sail against the mast) is not too complex but the leech side (the outer edge of the sail) also needs to be pulled down and the point from which it is pulled varies as the sail is pulled down to the boom. *One can imagine an attachment to the luff puller to allow this. *Both of these would require some sort of reinforcing on the luff and leech to allow it to be gripped by the puller. However, reefing systems need to also grip the sail along its bottom edge. *This is done on most boats by the reef points where the sail gets tied around the boom. *I have not yet figured out a way to do this or even if it is necessary. Back in the late 60s/early 70s, roller reefing was all the rage. *The boom was typically fitted out with a geared crank mechanism which would actually roll up the mainsail around the boom. * This seemed like a great idea on paper but in actual practice had some serious limitations: *Sail shape was terrible in the rolled configuration because of insufficient/non-existent outhaul tension; fixed boom vangs were impossible; and the mainsheet had to be led to the aft end of the boom by necessity. * The geared crank mechanism was also awkward to use, subject to failure, and required someone to go forward to the mast to operate it. I All of this led to the widespread adoption of slab reefing or "jiffy reefing" by the late 70s. *This had the advantage of maintaining outhaul/foot tension, and if rigged properly, could be done mostly from the cockpit. Not directly related to reefing, but becoming a very popular mainsail management technique, is the so called "stack pack" system which utilizes something called lazy jacks to guide the sail back on to the top of the boom when it is dropped. I do have a set of lazy jacks which I have not yet installed mostly because in my older and wiser age, I am now afraid of going up the mast. I do agree that slab reefing is so simple as to be hard to match. Mine is done with two control lines from the cockpit. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:52:54 -0700 (PDT), Katie Ohara
wrote: Not directly related to reefing, but becoming a very popular mainsail management technique, is the so called "stack pack" system which utilizes something called lazy jacks to guide the sail back on to the top of the boom when it is dropped. I do have a set of lazy jacks which I have not yet installed mostly because in my older and wiser age, I am now afraid of going up the mast. I do agree that slab reefing is so simple as to be hard to match. Mine is done with two control lines from the cockpit. You might be able to make temporary lazy jacks without going up the mast if you have extra halyards available. My old Cal-34 was rigged out with port and stbd spinnaker halyards. When we were in cruising mode I'd run a length of 1/4 inch shock cord down each side of the boom, each piece having a small loop in the middle. When it came time to drop the main we'd lead the spin halyards aft around the shrouds and clip them on to the loops in the shock cord. By raising the halyards half way, the shock cords would stretch out and form instant lazy jacks. It worked well for us, not as elegant as a stack pack system, but still a big improvement over a loose mainsail flapping around. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Katie Ohara" wrote in message ... On Jun 23, 10:24 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT), Katie Ohara wrote: The discussion of hauling in an anchor reminded me of something I have been thinking of for a couple of years, continuous furling of a normal mainsail without replacing the main or the boom. This means that small modifications could be made to a main so it could be raised any amount and pulled from fully raised to any extent. Current reefing systems are mostly incremental using one to three reefing levels (reef points). There are in-mast furlers which I do not like because they can fail with the main up and because they do not allow for battens and there are in-boom furlers that require a special boom. What I want to develop is a simple add-on to a boom allowing any main to be continuously reefed. Pulling down on the luff (the part of the sail against the mast) is not too complex but the leech side (the outer edge of the sail) also needs to be pulled down and the point from which it is pulled varies as the sail is pulled down to the boom. One can imagine an attachment to the luff puller to allow this. Both of these would require some sort of reinforcing on the luff and leech to allow it to be gripped by the puller. However, reefing systems need to also grip the sail along its bottom edge. This is done on most boats by the reef points where the sail gets tied around the boom. I have not yet figured out a way to do this or even if it is necessary. Back in the late 60s/early 70s, roller reefing was all the rage. The boom was typically fitted out with a geared crank mechanism which would actually roll up the mainsail around the boom. This seemed like a great idea on paper but in actual practice had some serious limitations: Sail shape was terrible in the rolled configuration because of insufficient/non-existent outhaul tension; fixed boom vangs were impossible; and the mainsheet had to be led to the aft end of the boom by necessity. The geared crank mechanism was also awkward to use, subject to failure, and required someone to go forward to the mast to operate it. I All of this led to the widespread adoption of slab reefing or "jiffy reefing" by the late 70s. This had the advantage of maintaining outhaul/foot tension, and if rigged properly, could be done mostly from the cockpit. Not directly related to reefing, but becoming a very popular mainsail management technique, is the so called "stack pack" system which utilizes something called lazy jacks to guide the sail back on to the top of the boom when it is dropped. I do have a set of lazy jacks which I have not yet installed mostly because in my older and wiser age, I am now afraid of going up the mast. I do agree that slab reefing is so simple as to be hard to match. Mine is done with two control lines from the cockpit. North Sails used to have a system where the sail rolled up into the mast. Don't know if they still do or if North is still in business. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roller Furling / Roller Reefing | Cruising | |||
Roller furling versus roller reefing | General | |||
Roller Furling | Cruising | |||
furling or "Stackpack" mainsail? | Cruising | |||
Furling mainsail idea | Cruising |