Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We've started the process of buying a newer and larger boat. One of the
major choices is the method of handling the mainsail. I have no experience with either furling, lazyjack or "dutchman" systems. I'd appreciate any comments or experiences with any or all these options. I'm leaning right now to a "stackpack" type system. Thanks. Ed |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:05:47 GMT, "Ed Thomas"
wrote: We've started the process of buying a newer and larger boat. One of the major choices is the method of handling the mainsail. I have no experience with either furling, lazyjack or "dutchman" systems. I'd appreciate any comments or experiences with any or all these options. I'm leaning right now to a "stackpack" type system. ===================================== I had a friend who installed a "stackpack" on a C&C 34. He liked it a lot. I used to install a variation of Lazy Jacks on my old Cal-34 when I was cruising with the family. It was very effective in helping to corral the mainsail on the drop. What we did was to run a loop of 3/8 shock cord around the boom, secured on each end. When ready to drop, we would lead each spinnaker halyard aft around the shrouds and attach to the shock cord on each side of the boom (the shock cord had small loops tied into it for this purpose). By raising the halyards about 12 feet, the shock cord would be lifted up and create large triangles into which the main would drop. This requires 2 spin halyards of course, but it does eliminate the installation of permanent clutter, and is easy to rig, not to mention inexpensive. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've never heard the term "stackpack" with regards to a mainsail.
Are you referring to a standard sail that is flaked on the boom, a Dutchman type system, an EasyJack or LazyJack system? We have in-mast furling system and are pretty happy with it. It came on our boat. But if I had it to do myself, I'd go for an in-boom furler. If it jams in the deployed position, it least you can get your sail down. If the in-mast system fails and the sail is stuck deployed, you are kind of stuck. Ours got stuck halfway deployed once but it was not the fault of the furling. A spare halyard got caught up while reefing and jammed. Took a while to figure out the problem but a mighty yank on the foot cleared the problem. Real down side of both is $$$. Previous owner said that the in-mast furling cost him around $25K. A friend is looking into in-boom systems and says it is quite expensive as well although I don't recall the price. Personally, I like the in-mast system but you can't point quite as well. My previous boat had a standard setup with EasyJacks that I built myself. Inexpensive, versatile and worked well. Doug s/v Callista "Ed Thomas" wrote in message news:fNacd.355$UX3.155@trndny03... We've started the process of buying a newer and larger boat. One of the major choices is the method of handling the mainsail. I have no experience with either furling, lazyjack or "dutchman" systems. I'd appreciate any comments or experiences with any or all these options. I'm leaning right now to a "stackpack" type system. Thanks. Ed |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a stackpak like system and have been very happy with it. It comes with Lazy
Jacks. Raising sail is a matter of attaching the halyard, pulling a zipper line, and raising. Releasing the halyard allows the sail to fall about 60% of the way, it takes a minute of work to lower it the rest of the way. The last time I was in Norwalk, I asked the "Dutchman" to look at my system to see if his rig would work with my stackpak, but he didn't see a way to do it. (Frankly I didn't understand why, but could argue.) If I had to choose, I'd go with the stackpak, because that means you'll always be using a sail cover. "Ed Thomas" wrote in message news:fNacd.355$UX3.155@trndny03... We've started the process of buying a newer and larger boat. One of the major choices is the method of handling the mainsail. I have no experience with either furling, lazyjack or "dutchman" systems. I'd appreciate any comments or experiences with any or all these options. I'm leaning right now to a "stackpack" type system. Thanks. Ed |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:55:19 -0400, "Doug Dotson"
wrote: I've never heard the term "stackpack" with regards to a mainsail. ===================================== It's a proprietary system by Doyle Sails: http://www.doylesails.com/sails-stackpackmain.htm |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have sailed extensively with both boom furling and lazyjack systems and have
very firm views, all prefaced with KISS - keep it simple ... . In boom furling is a very expensive means of doing a job very badly for the following reasons: * You have no outhaul control, especially when the sail is reefed, and so you cannot vary the sail shape and draft location to suit wind and swell conditions. Yacht will not point. * Boom and reefing assembly is very heavy which flattens sail in light weather when you need maximum sail shape. Yacht will not sail well in light conditions. * When reefing/furling boom must be absolutely horizontal or sail creaps along furler and may jam due to bunching. * Needs at least two people reef/furl - one to crank reefing winch (hard work) and another to lower halyard at exactly the same pace, else sail will furl unevenly and may jam. Also needs autohelm or a third person steering. I would urge you to look at a jiffy reefing system (also called slab reefing) in conjunction with lazyjacks or dutchman lines. I have never used the dutchman system so cannot comment on it. Lazyjacks are almost fault free although you do have to watch that batten ends do no get caught in them when hoisting sail - just drop the sail five feet to free them, then continue. My next mainsail will probably have full length battens, oversize batcars or similar, firm roach, and fit the existing lazyjack system. Finally, make sure that the sail cover is large enough. In normal cruising mode you will not drop and flake the main as neatly as your sailmaker, so you will need more room in the sailcover. Some sailmakers, especially Hood, seem to put a premium on making sailcovers very small and inobtrusive. Considering size of investment proposed you might consider sailing (even chartering) on yachts fitted with both systems to try them yourself. Just talk around your local yacht clubs and some helpful souls may emerge. Hope this helps. Graeme sv Leonidas |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But you must admit, mainsail furling and considering racing or overall speed
aside, is easy on crew or those who single hand. For example, I sailed solo from Annapolis through the South Pacific with mainsail furling and found in the trades sailing wing and wing the only adjustment I had to make was to the windvane. So, down wind sailing is somewhat simplified; don't you think? Moreover, from what I've notice, Hinckley, plus several other major boat builders have incorporated furling mainsails as an option. Although somewhat bias, since I have mainsail furling and consider the advantage of not going topside to furl sails or zip covers is more than just an opportunity, but safety for me in all conditions, I totally agree that the investment is substantial. "Graeme Cook" wrote in message ... | I have sailed extensively with both boom furling and lazyjack systems and have | very firm views, all prefaced with KISS - keep it simple ... . | | In boom furling is a very expensive means of doing a job very badly for the | following reasons: | | * You have no outhaul control, especially when the sail is reefed, and so you | cannot vary the sail shape and draft location to suit wind and swell | conditions. Yacht will not point. | | * Boom and reefing assembly is very heavy which flattens sail in light weather | when you need maximum sail shape. Yacht will not sail well in light conditions. | | * When reefing/furling boom must be absolutely horizontal or sail creaps along | furler and may jam due to bunching. | | * Needs at least two people reef/furl - one to crank reefing winch (hard work) | and another to lower halyard at exactly the same pace, else sail will furl | unevenly and may jam. Also needs autohelm or a third person steering. | | I would urge you to look at a jiffy reefing system (also called slab reefing) in | conjunction with lazyjacks or dutchman lines. I have never used the dutchman | system so cannot comment on it. | | Lazyjacks are almost fault free although you do have to watch that batten ends | do no get caught in them when hoisting sail - just drop the sail five feet to | free them, then continue. | | My next mainsail will probably have full length battens, oversize batcars or | similar, firm roach, and fit the existing lazyjack system. | | Finally, make sure that the sail cover is large enough. In normal cruising mode | you will not drop and flake the main as neatly as your sailmaker, so you will | need more room in the sailcover. Some sailmakers, especially Hood, seem to put | a premium on making sailcovers very small and inobtrusive. | | Considering size of investment proposed you might consider sailing (even | chartering) on yachts fitted with both systems to try them yourself. Just talk | around your local yacht clubs and some helpful souls may emerge. | | Hope this helps. | | Graeme | sv Leonidas | |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't see a practical way to make the zipper cooperate with
the Dutchman lines so that deploying is just a matter of pulling the zipper line. As far as always using a sailcover, I've never seen any situation where a sailcover isn't used. Nothing perculiar about stackpack in that regard. Doug s/v Callista "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... I have a stackpak like system and have been very happy with it. It comes with Lazy Jacks. Raising sail is a matter of attaching the halyard, pulling a zipper line, and raising. Releasing the halyard allows the sail to fall about 60% of the way, it takes a minute of work to lower it the rest of the way. The last time I was in Norwalk, I asked the "Dutchman" to look at my system to see if his rig would work with my stackpak, but he didn't see a way to do it. (Frankly I didn't understand why, but could argue.) If I had to choose, I'd go with the stackpak, because that means you'll always be using a sail cover. "Ed Thomas" wrote in message news:fNacd.355$UX3.155@trndny03... We've started the process of buying a newer and larger boat. One of the major choices is the method of handling the mainsail. I have no experience with either furling, lazyjack or "dutchman" systems. I'd appreciate any comments or experiences with any or all these options. I'm leaning right now to a "stackpack" type system. Thanks. Ed |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Dotson" wrote in message
... I can't see a practical way to make the zipper cooperate with the Dutchman lines so that deploying is just a matter of pulling the zipper line. I was think the the Dutchman lines could be relaxed (another halyard?) so that they would lie along the mast. As far as always using a sailcover, I've never seen any situation where a sailcover isn't used. Nothing perculiar about stackpack in that regard. If you have a StackPack you don't need a sailcover. The StackPack is a permanantly attached cover with a zipper on the top. Doug s/v Callista "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... I have a stackpak like system and have been very happy with it. It comes with Lazy Jacks. Raising sail is a matter of attaching the halyard, pulling a zipper line, and raising. Releasing the halyard allows the sail to fall about 60% of the way, it takes a minute of work to lower it the rest of the way. The last time I was in Norwalk, I asked the "Dutchman" to look at my system to see if his rig would work with my stackpak, but he didn't see a way to do it. (Frankly I didn't understand why, but could argue.) If I had to choose, I'd go with the stackpak, because that means you'll always be using a sail cover. "Ed Thomas" wrote in message news:fNacd.355$UX3.155@trndny03... We've started the process of buying a newer and larger boat. One of the major choices is the method of handling the mainsail. I have no experience with either furling, lazyjack or "dutchman" systems. I'd appreciate any comments or experiences with any or all these options. I'm leaning right now to a "stackpack" type system. Thanks. Ed |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This past season I have been singlehanding on my Ericson 38 using a UK
main with their "Lazy Cradle" version of the doyle "Stackpack", in combination with a Harken Battcar Batten Traveler system. I could not be more pleased. The Battcar system has so little friction that I can raise the main from the helm by hand, with the winch only needed for the last 6". When it comes time to drop the main I can cast off the halyard and the entire main drops inside the lazy jacks-sail cover. Storing the main is a simple matter of running the zipper forward along the sail cover, and moving the halyard from the headboard to the storage location on the cover. Highly recommended. Steve Christensen S/V Rag Doll Midland, MI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB:Famet Roller Furling in California. | Marketplace | |||
Full batten mainsail set unreadable. | ASA | |||
Furling Genoa | Cruising | |||
Furling mainsail idea | Cruising | |||
In-Mast Furling | ASA |