Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--new candidate

NOYB wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...


He'll get mauled by Bush in the pressing palms and kissing babies arena.


So what. Anyone who bases votes on a handshake is an idiot anyway.


Unfortunately, it's the "swing" voters that vote this way. They make up
less than 7% of the electorate, and there's no common theme that appeals to
them. They vote for the guy they like best, many times basing their vote on
nothing more than charisma.



Of course. How do you think a guy like Clinton could actually win....

Clinton is a prime example of someone who is long on charisma, and short
on character.

Dave


  #2   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--new candidate

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...


He'll get mauled by Bush in the pressing palms and kissing babies

arena.


So what. Anyone who bases votes on a handshake is an idiot anyway.


Unfortunately, it's the "swing" voters that vote this way. They make up
less than 7% of the electorate, and there's no common theme that appeals

to
them. They vote for the guy they like best, many times basing their

vote on
nothing more than charisma.



Of course. How do you think a guy like Clinton could actually win....

Clinton is a prime example of someone who is long on charisma, and short
on character.

Dave


Once again, your dependence on kindergarten-level news is obvious.

After BOTH Clinton's and Bush's successful elections, NPR sent a reporter
wandering around a couple of college campuses, asking students why they
voted the way they did. Regarding both candidates, many young women said
they voted for the winner because "he was cute", or they liked the way his
eyebrows wrinkled when making an important point in a speech.

NOYB was making a generic statement.


  #3   Report Post  
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--new candidate

Doug Kanter wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...


He'll get mauled by Bush in the pressing palms and kissing babies

arena.


So what. Anyone who bases votes on a handshake is an idiot anyway.

Unfortunately, it's the "swing" voters that vote this way. They make up
less than 7% of the electorate, and there's no common theme that appeals

to
them. They vote for the guy they like best, many times basing their

vote on
nothing more than charisma.



Of course. How do you think a guy like Clinton could actually win....

Clinton is a prime example of someone who is long on charisma, and short
on character.

Dave


Once again, your dependence on kindergarten-level news is obvious.


Oh? Where am I wrong then?


After BOTH Clinton's and Bush's successful elections, NPR sent a reporter
wandering around a couple of college campuses, asking students why they
voted the way they did. Regarding both candidates, many young women said
they voted for the winner because "he was cute", or they liked the way his
eyebrows wrinkled when making an important point in a speech.


Thank you for making my point for me.


NOYB was making a generic statement.


Which I applied to a specific individual, as a testiment to the validity
of the point.

Dave


  #4   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--new candidate

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...


Unfortunately, it's the "swing" voters that vote this way. They

make up
less than 7% of the electorate, and there's no common theme that

appeals
to
them. They vote for the guy they like best, many times basing their

vote on
nothing more than charisma.


Of course. How do you think a guy like Clinton could actually win....

Clinton is a prime example of someone who is long on charisma, and

short
on character.

Dave


Once again, your dependence on kindergarten-level news is obvious.


Oh? Where am I wrong then?


You are wrong in assuming that your leader, Nookular Boy, didn't benefit
mightily from the idiot vote, just the same as any other president.


After BOTH Clinton's and Bush's successful elections, NPR sent a

reporter
wandering around a couple of college campuses, asking students why they
voted the way they did. Regarding both candidates, many young women said
they voted for the winner because "he was cute", or they liked the way

his
eyebrows wrinkled when making an important point in a speech.


Thank you for making my point for me.


NOYB was making a generic statement.


Which I applied to a specific individual, as a testiment to the validity
of the point.

Dave



And I supplied you with information indicating that there will always be
numbskulls who vote this way, regardless of the candidate. Your leader ALSO
got votes from people like that.


  #5   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--new candidate

The "idiot vote" has determined 2 of the last three Presidential elections.
Perot pulled the idiots from Bush 41 in 2000. Nader pulled the idiots from
Gore in 2000. That's why a third party candidate is important...he/she
bleeds off most of the idiots, thus leaving a semi-intelligent electorate to
choose the best candidate. Of course, not much can be done to account for
the not-so-bright "semi-intelligent" voters that vote for someone because
"they're sexy" or "charismatic".

The idiot vote is precisely the reason Schwarznegger will win California
(*if* the vote proceeds). He'll get the Republicans and the idiot swing
voters. Bustamante will only get the Democrats. Of course, Larry Flynt and
the porno actress will pull some of the idiots from Schwarznegger...which
may be precisely why they are running.










"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...


Unfortunately, it's the "swing" voters that vote this way. They

make up
less than 7% of the electorate, and there's no common theme that

appeals
to
them. They vote for the guy they like best, many times basing

their
vote on
nothing more than charisma.


Of course. How do you think a guy like Clinton could actually

win....

Clinton is a prime example of someone who is long on charisma, and

short
on character.

Dave

Once again, your dependence on kindergarten-level news is obvious.


Oh? Where am I wrong then?


You are wrong in assuming that your leader, Nookular Boy, didn't benefit
mightily from the idiot vote, just the same as any other president.


After BOTH Clinton's and Bush's successful elections, NPR sent a

reporter
wandering around a couple of college campuses, asking students why

they
voted the way they did. Regarding both candidates, many young women

said
they voted for the winner because "he was cute", or they liked the way

his
eyebrows wrinkled when making an important point in a speech.


Thank you for making my point for me.


NOYB was making a generic statement.


Which I applied to a specific individual, as a testiment to the validity
of the point.

Dave



And I supplied you with information indicating that there will always be
numbskulls who vote this way, regardless of the candidate. Your leader

ALSO
got votes from people like that.






Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017