On 24/05/2010 11:02 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote:
Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in
spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller
than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally
unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will
actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be
problems.

Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin
to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by
Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about
anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media
jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely.

Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the
spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts
for that purpose?

After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a
fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats.



It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for
BP's screw-ups to the government.

Governemnt is no different than a welfare dependant person like you or
de-fumer. They want more money and provide nothing for it.


--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth.

On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:33:39 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Governemnt is no different than a welfare dependant person like you or
de-fumer. They want more money and provide nothing for it.

tell it to the marines