On 24/05/2010 9:26 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote:
Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in
spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller
than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally
unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will
actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be
problems.

Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin
to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by
Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about
anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media
jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely.

Not to be political, but that does hit the nail on the head.

Does mean then Obama is bribable, so in either case Obama is a screwup.

--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 24/05/2010 9:26 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote:
Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in
spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller
than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally
unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will
actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be
problems.

Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin
to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by
Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about
anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media
jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely.

Not to be political, but that does hit the nail on the head.

Does mean then Obama is bribable, so in either case Obama is a screwup.

--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create
wealth.


In all cases, you're stupid.