"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:05:49 -0400, moose wrote:

On 5/18/2010 3:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 5/18/2010 1:33 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400,
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for
abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN
NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL'S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL CONSUMING
FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF
"NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE
HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD
HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY FAMILY
BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY STAFF. IN
THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS
SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER THAN
TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job


There you go.

I don't for a moment think that Dems are any more "spouse loyal" than
Repubs. The saving grace for the Dems, though, is that for the most
part
they do not align themselves with the rigid (and hypocritically held)
"family values" of the conservative right, and therefore are less
likely
to be caught up in these sorts of scandals.

I always grin at the foibles of these idiots when they claim they've
"sinned against god." That implies they have special knowledge of a
creator when no one knows if there is one.

By your way of thinking, If you don't condemn an act you are less
likely
to be called out when you do it. Whoopty Do!


It's about bs hypocrisy not condemnation of the act. The act itself is
wrong. The hypocrisy of promoting family values and using that promotion
as
a cudgel is even worse.

http://www.keyway.ca/htm2004/20040811.htm


Oh, I see. Hipocracy is worse than some of the horrendous acts that were
and are being commited. You are as big a dip**** as Harry. Pardon my
French. Harry is such a pussy when it comes to discussing his own
religion, but he's ready, willing, and eager to trash other peoples
religion. At least, to your credit , you haven't stooped that low.

Being a hypocrit is bad. It's kinda like saying one is trying improve this
group
while making offensive comments with almost every response.

However, being a liar is much worse. But, I suppose the NY Times is just
another
right wing rag.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/nyregion/19reax.html?src=mv`1


--
Annoy a Liberal...practice personal responsibility!

John H


So, you believe hypocracy isn't lying. Not too bright are you...

On 5/18/10 3:54 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 2:11 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:59 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 1:33 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400,
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for
abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN
NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL’S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL CONSUMING
FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF
"NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE
HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD
HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY FAMILY BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY STAFF. IN
THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS
SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER
THAN TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job


There you go.

I don't for a moment think that Dems are any more "spouse loyal" than
Repubs. The saving grace for the Dems, though, is that for the most
part
they do not align themselves with the rigid (and hypocritically held)
"family values" of the conservative right, and therefore are less
likely
to be caught up in these sorts of scandals.

I always grin at the foibles of these idiots when they claim they've
"sinned against god." That implies they have special knowledge of a
creator when no one knows if there is one.

I don't know if dumping "abstinence" would help the catholic clergy,
but
I do know it sure as hell would attract a different sort of person to
the priesthood and to the nun sisterhood, and the numbers of those who
engage in sex with minors probably would diminish as time went on.

Abstinence...the dumbest idea ever.




By your way of thinking, If you don't condemn an act you are less likely
to be called out when you do it. Whoopty Do!



No, **** for brains. If you don't build your career on pandering to the
false values of the hard right, then when you are caught with your
finger in the nookie jar, you may be called out on it, but at least you
will not be accused of hypocrisy.

No wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You needed someone
to think for you.



It was the pussies and pansys like you and Blumenthal that sought
deferment after deferment to avoid giving service to your country. Are
you claiming some sort of intellectual superiority because you chose the
cowards way out? You have mad a fool of yourself so many times over this
issue. You'd think you'd learn to either avoid it or come up with a
decent lie to cover yourself.
You really are an ignorant asshole, aren't you?




What flajim is telling us here is that after high school, he didn't even
have the smarts necessary to get into college, maintain a 2.0 ("C")
average, and hang onto a II-S student deferment for four or five years.

In other words, he was (and is) as dumb as the proverbial post.

So...no wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You were too
stupid or lazy to get into and stay in a college.

BTW, if memory serves, college students didn't have to seek "deferment
after deferment." All you had to do is make progress towards a degree.





--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On Tue, 18 May 2010 13:17:49 -0400, wrote:




Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job

given the number of republicans who are cheats and liars, if they all
did that there would be no republicans

On 5/18/2010 4:37 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:05:49 -0400, wrote:

On 5/18/2010 3:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 5/18/2010 1:33 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400,
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for
abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN
NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL'S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL CONSUMING
FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF
"NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE
HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD
HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY FAMILY
BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY STAFF. IN
THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS
SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER THAN
TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job


There you go.

I don't for a moment think that Dems are any more "spouse loyal" than
Repubs. The saving grace for the Dems, though, is that for the most
part
they do not align themselves with the rigid (and hypocritically held)
"family values" of the conservative right, and therefore are less
likely
to be caught up in these sorts of scandals.

I always grin at the foibles of these idiots when they claim they've
"sinned against god." That implies they have special knowledge of a
creator when no one knows if there is one.

By your way of thinking, If you don't condemn an act you are less
likely
to be called out when you do it. Whoopty Do!


It's about bs hypocrisy not condemnation of the act. The act itself is
wrong. The hypocrisy of promoting family values and using that promotion
as
a cudgel is even worse.

http://www.keyway.ca/htm2004/20040811.htm


Oh, I see. Hipocracy is worse than some of the horrendous acts that were
and are being commited. You are as big a dip**** as Harry. Pardon my
French. Harry is such a pussy when it comes to discussing his own
religion, but he's ready, willing, and eager to trash other peoples
religion. At least, to your credit , you haven't stooped that low.

Being a hypocrit is bad. It's kinda like saying one is trying improve this
group
while making offensive comments with almost every response.

However, being a liar is much worse. But, I suppose the NY Times is just
another
right wing rag.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/nyregion/19reax.html?src=mv`1


--
Annoy a Liberal...practice personal responsibility!

John H


So, you believe hypocracy isn't lying. Not too bright are you...




So you believe hypocrisy is lying?

Using the following example you would be correct.

A "champagne socialist" is a pejorative political term originating in
the United Kingdom. The phrase is used to describe a Socialist
self-proclaimed advocate of the poor or working classes, who claims to
support a form of socialist ideology, but who might disregard socialist
ideals in their daily life. Champagne Socialists may claim to be against
the Capitalist system but will still happily function in it and prosper
from it. The term is sometimes used as an attack by opposing politicians
to portray and ridicule their opponents as hypocritical.

But the following definition makes think that you are, maybe, full of ****e.

Main Entry: hyp·o·crite
Pronunciation: \ˈhi-pə-ˌkrit\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin
hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date: 13th century

1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or
feelings

— hypocrite adjective

Read more on the subject and find out that you and Harriet are both
Hypocrites. Have a pleasant day. Oh! If that makes you liers too, then
so be it.

On 5/18/2010 5:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 3:54 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 2:11 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:59 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 1:33 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400,
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for
abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN
NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL’S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL CONSUMING
FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF
"NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE
HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD
HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY
FAMILY BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY STAFF. IN
THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS
SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER
THAN TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job


There you go.

I don't for a moment think that Dems are any more "spouse loyal" than
Repubs. The saving grace for the Dems, though, is that for the most
part
they do not align themselves with the rigid (and hypocritically held)
"family values" of the conservative right, and therefore are less
likely
to be caught up in these sorts of scandals.

I always grin at the foibles of these idiots when they claim they've
"sinned against god." That implies they have special knowledge of a
creator when no one knows if there is one.

I don't know if dumping "abstinence" would help the catholic clergy,
but
I do know it sure as hell would attract a different sort of person to
the priesthood and to the nun sisterhood, and the numbers of those who
engage in sex with minors probably would diminish as time went on.

Abstinence...the dumbest idea ever.




By your way of thinking, If you don't condemn an act you are less
likely
to be called out when you do it. Whoopty Do!



No, **** for brains. If you don't build your career on pandering to the
false values of the hard right, then when you are caught with your
finger in the nookie jar, you may be called out on it, but at least you
will not be accused of hypocrisy.

No wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You needed someone
to think for you.



It was the pussies and pansys like you and Blumenthal that sought
deferment after deferment to avoid giving service to your country. Are
you claiming some sort of intellectual superiority because you chose the
cowards way out? You have mad a fool of yourself so many times over this
issue. You'd think you'd learn to either avoid it or come up with a
decent lie to cover yourself.
You really are an ignorant asshole, aren't you?




What flajim is telling us here is that after high school, he didn't even
have the smarts necessary to get into college, maintain a 2.0 ("C")
average, and hang onto a II-S student deferment for four or five years.

In other words, he was (and is) as dumb as the proverbial post.

So...no wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You were too
stupid or lazy to get into and stay in a college.

BTW, if memory serves, college students didn't have to seek "deferment
after deferment." All you had to do is make progress towards a degree.





So all you had to do to avoid that dreadful draft was maintain a "c"
average and make progress toward a degree. How convenient for you.

So, what I think you are trying to tell us is that those that enlisted
or allowed themselves to be drafted, are dumb, stupid and lazy.

I find it difficult to put into words my contempt for you.
I suppose I could do as you do and say Eat **** And Die.

I can see that your blood pressure must be sky high by now. Be careful
you don't have an aneurysm.

On 5/18/10 5:57 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 5:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 3:54 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 2:11 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:59 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 1:33 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400,
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for
abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of
his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN
NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL’S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL CONSUMING
FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF
"NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE
HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD
HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY
FAMILY BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY
STAFF. IN
THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS
SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER
THAN TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for
your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job


There you go.

I don't for a moment think that Dems are any more "spouse loyal" than
Repubs. The saving grace for the Dems, though, is that for the most
part
they do not align themselves with the rigid (and hypocritically held)
"family values" of the conservative right, and therefore are less
likely
to be caught up in these sorts of scandals.

I always grin at the foibles of these idiots when they claim they've
"sinned against god." That implies they have special knowledge of a
creator when no one knows if there is one.

I don't know if dumping "abstinence" would help the catholic clergy,
but
I do know it sure as hell would attract a different sort of person to
the priesthood and to the nun sisterhood, and the numbers of those
who
engage in sex with minors probably would diminish as time went on.

Abstinence...the dumbest idea ever.




By your way of thinking, If you don't condemn an act you are less
likely
to be called out when you do it. Whoopty Do!



No, **** for brains. If you don't build your career on pandering to the
false values of the hard right, then when you are caught with your
finger in the nookie jar, you may be called out on it, but at least you
will not be accused of hypocrisy.

No wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You needed someone
to think for you.



It was the pussies and pansys like you and Blumenthal that sought
deferment after deferment to avoid giving service to your country. Are
you claiming some sort of intellectual superiority because you chose the
cowards way out? You have mad a fool of yourself so many times over this
issue. You'd think you'd learn to either avoid it or come up with a
decent lie to cover yourself.
You really are an ignorant asshole, aren't you?




What flajim is telling us here is that after high school, he didn't even
have the smarts necessary to get into college, maintain a 2.0 ("C")
average, and hang onto a II-S student deferment for four or five years.

In other words, he was (and is) as dumb as the proverbial post.

So...no wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You were too
stupid or lazy to get into and stay in a college.

BTW, if memory serves, college students didn't have to seek "deferment
after deferment." All you had to do is make progress towards a degree.





So all you had to do to avoid that dreadful draft was maintain a "c"
average and make progress toward a degree. How convenient for you.

So, what I think you are trying to tell us is that those that enlisted
or allowed themselves to be drafted, are dumb, stupid and lazy.

I find it difficult to put into words my contempt for you.
I suppose I could do as you do and say Eat **** And Die.

I can see that your blood pressure must be sky high by now. Be careful
you don't have an aneurysm.



It's not all *I* had to do, but it was all one had to do to maintain a
II-S deferment. Not only did I have a 3.9 average, overall, as an
undergrad, but my last year and a half, I had a full-time night job
on a newspaper. My grades and recommendations were good enough for a
fellowship to grad school.

You were and are dumb, stupid and lazy. If you want to project *that*
onto those who served with you, that's your call. It isn't mine. And you
were such a stellar soldier, you won't even discuss what you did in the
navy, or what you did once out. My guess is that you were a handyman's
boat repair guy, a freelancer unable to get hooked up with a franchised
dealer.

BTW, my blood pressure these days runs about 110 over 60-65. There's
nothing you or any of the right-wing turds here could do to raise it.






--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/18/2010 4:37 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:05:49 -0400, wrote:

On 5/18/2010 3:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 5/18/2010 1:33 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400,
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for
abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of
his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN
NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL'S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL
CONSUMING
FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF
"NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE
HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD
HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY FAMILY
BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY STAFF.
IN
THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS
SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER
THAN
TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for
your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job


There you go.

I don't for a moment think that Dems are any more "spouse loyal"
than
Repubs. The saving grace for the Dems, though, is that for the most
part
they do not align themselves with the rigid (and hypocritically
held)
"family values" of the conservative right, and therefore are less
likely
to be caught up in these sorts of scandals.

I always grin at the foibles of these idiots when they claim they've
"sinned against god." That implies they have special knowledge of a
creator when no one knows if there is one.

By your way of thinking, If you don't condemn an act you are less
likely
to be called out when you do it. Whoopty Do!


It's about bs hypocrisy not condemnation of the act. The act itself is
wrong. The hypocrisy of promoting family values and using that
promotion
as
a cudgel is even worse.

http://www.keyway.ca/htm2004/20040811.htm


Oh, I see. Hipocracy is worse than some of the horrendous acts that
were
and are being commited. You are as big a dip**** as Harry. Pardon my
French. Harry is such a pussy when it comes to discussing his own
religion, but he's ready, willing, and eager to trash other peoples
religion. At least, to your credit , you haven't stooped that low.

Being a hypocrit is bad. It's kinda like saying one is trying improve
this
group
while making offensive comments with almost every response.

However, being a liar is much worse. But, I suppose the NY Times is just
another
right wing rag.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/nyregion/19reax.html?src=mv`1


--
Annoy a Liberal...practice personal responsibility!

John H


So, you believe hypocracy isn't lying. Not too bright are you...




So you believe hypocrisy is lying?

Using the following example you would be correct.

A "champagne socialist" is a pejorative political term originating in the
United Kingdom. The phrase is used to describe a Socialist self-proclaimed
advocate of the poor or working classes, who claims to support a form of
socialist ideology, but who might disregard socialist ideals in their
daily life. Champagne Socialists may claim to be against the Capitalist
system but will still happily function in it and prosper from it. The term
is sometimes used as an attack by opposing politicians to portray and
ridicule their opponents as hypocritical.

But the following definition makes think that you are, maybe, full of
****e.

Main Entry: hyp·o·crite
Pronunciation: \'hi-p?-?krit\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin
hypocrita, from Greek hypokrites actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date: 13th century

1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or
feelings

- hypocrite adjective

Read more on the subject and find out that you and Harriet are both
Hypocrites. Have a pleasant day. Oh! If that makes you liers too, then so
be it.

Interesting that you can copy and paste just fine, but when it comes to
actually typing something, you fail miserably.

Yes, for sure, you're an idiot.

On 5/18/2010 6:05 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 5:57 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 5:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 3:54 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 2:11 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:59 PM, moose wrote:
On 5/18/2010 1:33 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/18/10 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400,
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for
abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of
his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN
NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL’S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL
CONSUMING
FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF
"NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE
HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD
HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY
FAMILY BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY
STAFF. IN
THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS
SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER
THAN TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for
your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.

Maybe he should have just switched parties like Specter ... to save
his job


There you go.

I don't for a moment think that Dems are any more "spouse loyal"
than
Repubs. The saving grace for the Dems, though, is that for the most
part
they do not align themselves with the rigid (and hypocritically
held)
"family values" of the conservative right, and therefore are less
likely
to be caught up in these sorts of scandals.

I always grin at the foibles of these idiots when they claim they've
"sinned against god." That implies they have special knowledge of a
creator when no one knows if there is one.

I don't know if dumping "abstinence" would help the catholic clergy,
but
I do know it sure as hell would attract a different sort of
person to
the priesthood and to the nun sisterhood, and the numbers of those
who
engage in sex with minors probably would diminish as time went on.

Abstinence...the dumbest idea ever.




By your way of thinking, If you don't condemn an act you are less
likely
to be called out when you do it. Whoopty Do!



No, **** for brains. If you don't build your career on pandering to
the
false values of the hard right, then when you are caught with your
finger in the nookie jar, you may be called out on it, but at least
you
will not be accused of hypocrisy.

No wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You needed
someone
to think for you.



It was the pussies and pansys like you and Blumenthal that sought
deferment after deferment to avoid giving service to your country. Are
you claiming some sort of intellectual superiority because you chose
the
cowards way out? You have mad a fool of yourself so many times over
this
issue. You'd think you'd learn to either avoid it or come up with a
decent lie to cover yourself.
You really are an ignorant asshole, aren't you?






I might be dumb stupid and lazy,You don't know that. Aren't you projecting?


What flajim is telling us here is that after high school, he didn't even
have the smarts necessary to get into college, maintain a 2.0 ("C")
average, and hang onto a II-S student deferment for four or five years.

In other words, he was (and is) as dumb as the proverbial post.

So...no wonder you went into the navy instead of college. You were too
stupid or lazy to get into and stay in a college.

BTW, if memory serves, college students didn't have to seek "deferment
after deferment." All you had to do is make progress towards a degree.





So all you had to do to avoid that dreadful draft was maintain a "c"
average and make progress toward a degree. How convenient for you.

So, what I think you are trying to tell us is that those that enlisted
or allowed themselves to be drafted, are dumb, stupid and lazy.

I find it difficult to put into words my contempt for you.
I suppose I could do as you do and say Eat **** And Die.

I can see that your blood pressure must be sky high by now. Be careful
you don't have an aneurysm.




Harry pours his heart out seeking accolades.

It's not all *I* had to do, but it was all one had to do to maintain a
II-S deferment. Not only did I have a 3.9 average, overall, as an
undergrad, but my last year and a half, I had a full-time night job
on a newspaper. My grades and recommendations were good enough for a
fellowship to grad school.

You were and are dumb, stupid and lazy. If you want to project *that*
onto those who served with you, that's your call. It isn't mine. And you
were such a stellar soldier, you won't even discuss what you did in the
navy, or what you did once out. My guess is that you were a handyman's
boat repair guy, a freelancer unable to get hooked up with a franchised
dealer.

BTW, my blood pressure these days runs about 110 over 60-65. There's
nothing you or any of the right-wing turds here could do to raise it.







Putting all this aside, you are still a coward and a loser that lives in
a basement with his computers.

wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:13:42 -0400, hk
wrote:

...snerk of the week:

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana -- the leading advocate for abstinence
education in Congress -- will resign after an affair with one of his
female staffers became public. From his statement of resignation

IT IS WITH GREAT REGRET I ANNOUNCE THAT I AM RESIGNING FROM THE US
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS WELL AS RESIGNING AS THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE
FOR CONGRESS IN THIS FALL’S ELECTION. ... IT HAS BEEN ALL CONSUMING FOR
ME TO DO THIS JOB WELL, ESPECIALLY IN A DISTRICT WITH COSTLY,
COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS EVERY TWO YEARS I DO NOT HAVE ANY SORT OF "NORMAL"
LIFE - FOR FAMILY, FOR FRIENDS, FOR CHURCH, FOR COMMUNITY.TO SERVE HAS
BEEN A BLESSING AND A RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN FROM GOD.I WISH I COULD HAVE
BEEN A BETTER EXAMPLE. I SINNED AGAINST GOD, MY WIFE AND MY FAMILY BY
HAVING A MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A PART-TIME MEMBER OF MY STAFF. IN THE
POISONOUS ENVIRONMENT OF WASHINGTON DC, ANY PERSONAL FAILING IS SEIZED
UPON, OFTEN TWISTED, FOR POLITICAL GAIN. I AM RESIGNING RATHER THAN TO
PUT MY FAMILY THROUGH THAT PAINFUL, DRAWN-OUT PROCESS.

Yes, Mark. Washington, DC is to blame. For everything. Even for your
resignation. Yup.

Of course this wouldn't be a Republican sex scandal if Mark Souder
weren't a hard core family values advocate. You know, the kind who
preaches abstinence.


Swiped from KOS.


It is interesting that the GOP has a zero tolerance policy on these
things but I suppose it doers have to do with the things they are
supposed to stand for.


Zero tolerance my ass. Where have you been?
Vitter and Ensign are whores, and still drawing their pay.
Souder is standing by his convictions, and seeking redemption.
Good for him.

Jim - A sinner can redeem himself. Don't ask how I know.

On 5/18/10 7:14 PM, moose wrote:


Putting all this aside, you are still a coward and a loser that lives in
a basement with his computers.

I should take pity on you. You aren't equipped to win an argument with
one of our pet cats.

You must have been one hell of a sailorboy, flajim, so much of one you
can't even discuss what you did in the navy. Oh, but wait... *you* have
discharge papers. Oh, but wait...you can't even discuss what you did for
employment after the navy.

But, not to worry...the other mustered out geniuses, herring and
boatless bert, will surely come to your rescue.




--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.