![]() |
Cruising and reality
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:28:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: There's a guy locally that has a huge 80+ foot whatever moored and slipped at Kentucky lake, and it sits. In the fall, he'll fire it up and tool it down to Fla. and slip it there, and fly back. Then in the spring, he'll fly back down, fire it up and cruise back to Ky. Lake. And ti sits. He's done that for years. i never saw much future in that, really. It's called owning a floating condominium. There are quite a few of them. The *really* wealthy guys will typically have a professional captain and crew to move the "condominium" around for them. |
Cruising and reality
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:01:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: 6.5 hp diesel? What make? kubota? Yannmar? Lombardini? I'm surprised that 6.5 could push anything of that size. other than a small riding mower. You'd be surprised. Sailboat hulls, especially a racing sailboat that is well maintained, have very slippery hulls. In flat water, no wind and no current it takes almost nothing to get tthem moving. I was once out cruising and racing on a 40 footer that lost its prop. We lashed a dinghy along side like a tugboat and used its little 2 hp Evinrude to bring the big boat into the dock. |
Cruising and reality
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:24:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: But wouldn't a boat of the size I mentioned be powered with a decent engine? Seems like it would be, but I haven't really looked into it. A 40 ft cruising sailboat would typically have a diesel in the 30 to 40 hp range. In flat water and no wind that's enough for 6 1/2 to 7 kts if the bottom is clean. |
Cruising and reality
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:07:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: My understanding is that the engine on a cruising type boat would be able to bring the boat to "hull" speed. You can't really go faster than that, so I suppose the appropriate engine would be one that could do that (or nearly so)? 1.34 x sq. rt of water line? So, assuming there's overhang on a 42' boat, say the water line is 40' the max speed would be about 8.5. Of course, if it were not pushing all the water, skimming, then you could go faster. As I stated previously it doesn't take a lot of power to get a sailboat moving at close to hull speed in flat water and no wind. It takes a lot more power however, and a large prop, to get the same boat moving against 25 kts of wind and 6 ft seas. You have to decide what kind of conditions you are likely to encounter. There is nothing worse than being caught out in a raging wind squall with an under powered boat, and a lee shore close at hand. |
Cruising and reality
Tim wrote:
On Apr 18, 12:45 am, wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:15:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:18:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: The smell of diesel, the most masculine cologne. NOT blech. -- You may be too young to remember the 70s when guys would spritz a little gasoline behind their ear in hopes a girl would think you worked in a gas station. Good grief... did any of them live? Gee whiz ... nothing? not even a mercy LOL? You must be too young to remember gas lines. ;-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I remember them. Wait in lne for a hour so you could get $5.00 of gas and that was the limit. And if you were lucky you could get gas before the station ran out. It was rationed to them too! What is $5.00 get you back then? 10 gallons or so? |
Cruising and reality
wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:08:37 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Apr 18, 12:45 am, wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:15:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:18:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: The smell of diesel, the most masculine cologne. NOT blech. -- You may be too young to remember the 70s when guys would spritz a little gasoline behind their ear in hopes a girl would think you worked in a gas station. Good grief... did any of them live? Gee whiz ... nothing? not even a mercy LOL? You must be too young to remember gas lines. ;-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I remember them. Wait in lne for a hour so you could get $5.00 of gas and that was the limit. And if you were lucky you could get gas before the station ran out. It was rationed to them too! I am sure Plume would be flirting with the gas station guy to try to get an extra few gallons. I do remember parking in the gas station in the middle of the night so I would be there when they opened. I also had a odd/even permit so I could get gas on either day. I owned a company with delivery trucks and we were exempt. Commercial plates were exempt from the odd even. Was nice my pickup was exempt and there was a station near my house that was sort of out of the way and wife could normally fill up without a wait. The delivery trucks fueled at a Cardlock station, so we could fill the family vehicles also 24/7. Biggest problem was we had to get the drivers to put in a little more than they need for the route, as we had lots of people deciding to climb the fence and siphon gas. And steal batteries. Later we went to diesel delivery trucks, which would have cut down on the theft. |
Cruising and reality
"Larry" wrote in message ... Tim wrote: On Apr 18, 12:45 am, wrote: On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:15:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:18:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: The smell of diesel, the most masculine cologne. NOT blech. -- You may be too young to remember the 70s when guys would spritz a little gasoline behind their ear in hopes a girl would think you worked in a gas station. Good grief... did any of them live? Gee whiz ... nothing? not even a mercy LOL? You must be too young to remember gas lines. ;-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I remember them. Wait in lne for a hour so you could get $5.00 of gas and that was the limit. And if you were lucky you could get gas before the station ran out. It was rationed to them too! What is $5.00 get you back then? 10 gallons or so? Nope got you about 5 gallons. I think the day that I really realized how expensive gas was getting, was the day I filled up my 350 cc Kawasaki. 3.5 gallon tank and cost me a little over $5. Putting $25 in the van just did not strike you as bad as $5 in a small motorcycle. |
Cruising and reality
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:07:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: My understanding is that the engine on a cruising type boat would be able to bring the boat to "hull" speed. You can't really go faster than that, so I suppose the appropriate engine would be one that could do that (or nearly so)? 1.34 x sq. rt of water line? So, assuming there's overhang on a 42' boat, say the water line is 40' the max speed would be about 8.5. Of course, if it were not pushing all the water, skimming, then you could go faster. As I stated previously it doesn't take a lot of power to get a sailboat moving at close to hull speed in flat water and no wind. It takes a lot more power however, and a large prop, to get the same boat moving against 25 kts of wind and 6 ft seas. You have to decide what kind of conditions you are likely to encounter. There is nothing worse than being caught out in a raging wind squall with an under powered boat, and a lee shore close at hand. I can imagine. Our thinking is that with a fairly new sailboat in the 40-foot range, it would likely have a decent engine. I'm sure that would be part of the go/no-go decision for buying. I can imagine it would be fairly expensive to repower if it wasn't sized properly. My friends in Santa Cruz have a sailboat with a fairly small engine (30ish foot boat). I think the hp was maybe 15... something like that. A larger boat.. maybe 50 hp? I think that's what I saw at the boat show. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cruising and reality
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:24:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: But wouldn't a boat of the size I mentioned be powered with a decent engine? Seems like it would be, but I haven't really looked into it. A 40 ft cruising sailboat would typically have a diesel in the 30 to 40 hp range. In flat water and no wind that's enough for 6 1/2 to 7 kts if the bottom is clean. Ok.. I just guessed/remembered seeing 50hp. So, that's pretty close. Seems like unless you're close to shore, you really don't need a lot of engine power. Maybe in a storm, but wouldn't the concern be running the engine without intake water or running out of fuel if you run it too long? I'm mean that's why it's a sailboat... to sail. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cruising and reality
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:46:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: Seems like unless you're close to shore, you really don't need a lot of engine power. Maybe in a storm, but wouldn't the concern be running the engine without intake water or running out of fuel if you run it too long? I'm mean that's why it's a sailboat... to sail. There are two times when you need power on a sailboat: Bad weather and good weather. Most cruising sailboats spend more than 90% of their time underway with the engine running. Either the wind is from the wrong direction, too weak or too strong. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com