Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:41:46 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Well, that certainly seems right. It would only be the two of us in the "real" partnership. And, even that would be pretty well spelled out, at least as far as money goes. I can't imagine wanting to sail it by myself (and I doubt he's interested in that). I suppose he could take the boat out with friends, but I have no problem with that. My advice? Be very, very careful. I have seen quite a few boat partnerships over the years and most have ended badly, some very badly with years of legal disputes to unwind and broken friendships. Almost everyone under estimates the total cost of ownership. It can be really staggering at times, and it never stops. You have truly got to love boats, and have quite a bit of disposable income to get serious about owning part of a large boat. No two people ever seem to agree on what expenses are necessary, what maintenance must be done, or what equipment needs to be purchased. Some of those decisions are difficult for one person to make let alone a committee. Certainly good advice. Thanks. I'm not terribly savvy about "equipment" requirements for long travels. I would defer to Jay. As far as the others go, that's certainly a concern, given them not putting a lot of money up front. I think it would get more tricky if/when they start paying for equipment, which would have to be a group decision. I'm thinking it would be majority rule, so if our friends, say, wanted radar, and we didn't, it would be overruled. I'm willing to usually defer to Jay, so that would mean the only way it could happen against his wishes would be for me to team up with both of the other people. I think that's pretty unlikely, except perhaps when it comes to food or wine color. ![]() Jay and I would be using our savings both to buy the boat and to be away (mostly) from income-producing situations. The other couple would be spending what they can afford while we're still here, then have a free ride (e.g., food/drink/lodging/fees) for as long as they wanted to travel with us. I know they don't want to commit to more than 2-3 months, and I know we want to commit to a bit longer. Another tricky part is when/if we decided to give up the boat, how (or would) we give them some of their equipment money back. I'm pretty easy about it, depending on how much they really want. None of us are hurting for funds, so it would be more of a what-seems-fair vs. need. I (and Sal) would be in learning mode for sailing and fixing, but Jay and Brian would have to be comfortable with Jay being the skipper. I don't really get seasick... but I've never been off shore for more than a few hours. Sal tends to eat her way out of any unpleasant stomach issues, and Jay/Brian claim to be rock solid. (... another good reason for me/Sal to know what's what, since they're typically full of sh*t) -- Nom=de=Plume |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone have experience with "Sail Care" for sail reconditioning? | Cruising | |||
Strictly Sail St Petersburg, FL | Cruising | |||
Removing Adhesive from Sail Numbers on sail | General | |||
FS: 1997 40 FT Sea Ray 400 Sedan Bridge in Oakland, CA | Marketplace | |||
FS: 40 FT Sea Ray 400 Sedan Bridge in Oakland, CA | Marketplace |