On Apr 13, 10:16*am, hk wrote:
On 4/13/10 9:54 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 13, 9:23 am, *wrote:
Mine's faster and I'll bet a good amount that I use less fuel than you.

I was guesstimating the WOT speed of Herring's unused boat, Loogy for
Brains. My Parker is three feet longer than herring's boat, is much
deeper, is a deep vee and weighs at least 1000 pounds more. At WOT, the
Parker runs 40 mph, but I've only run WOT a couple of times. I have no
desire or need to run over the water at that speed.

As for your claim about your boat, well, I doubt you have a boat and if
you do, you never use it...and therefore your fuel use has to be less, eh?

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, my boat was out last weekend. Was yours? OH, and the boat you
owned before this one only had 25 hours on it according to you. And
again, you can "doubt" all you want, but you're doing so in ignorance,
you know nothing about the boats I have, and how much I use them.

1. Your boat was out last weekend...bull****.

Please provide the information you have that my boat wasn't out last
weekend.

2. The boat I owned before had only 25 hours on it...bull****.

Uh, that's what you said when you sold it, fat boy.

I love the "25 hours" business. Since my 25' Parker was bought new, at
some point it did have only 25 hours on the engine.

See above, dummy.

On 4/13/10 11:09 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:16 am, wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:

Pssst, my boat was out last weekend. Was yours? OH, and the boat you
owned before this one only had 25 hours on it according to you. And
again, you can "doubt" all you want, but you're doing so in ignorance,
you know nothing about the boats I have, and how much I use them.

Sorry Loogy. I don't believe you have a boat.
Looks like you picked up some lying ways from your lib bud Harry.
Thing is, I believe Harry has a boat, along with John, Wayne, Dan, Greg,
Tom, Jack, Tim, and the others who actually talk about their boats.
But you don't ever really talk boats, just harry Harry.
Damn shame you feel the need to lie, but you're a lib, so I guess it
goes with the territory.
But shame on you anyway.

Jim - If a man's got a boat, he talks about his damn boat in a boating
group. Simple as that.

Do you mean like a lobster boat?


Tell us about your boat(s), pomeranian boy.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

hk wrote:
On 4/13/10 9:54 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:23 am, wrote:

Mine's faster and I'll bet a good amount that I use less fuel than you.

I was guesstimating the WOT speed of Herring's unused boat, Loogy for
Brains. My Parker is three feet longer than herring's boat, is much
deeper, is a deep vee and weighs at least 1000 pounds more. At WOT, the
Parker runs 40 mph, but I've only run WOT a couple of times. I have no
desire or need to run over the water at that speed.

As for your claim about your boat, well, I doubt you have a boat and if
you do, you never use it...and therefore your fuel use has to be
less, eh?

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, my boat was out last weekend. Was yours? OH, and the boat you
owned before this one only had 25 hours on it according to you. And
again, you can "doubt" all you want, but you're doing so in ignorance,
you know nothing about the boats I have, and how much I use them.

1. Your boat was out last weekend...bull****.

2. The boat I owned before had only 25 hours on it...bull****.


I love the "25 hours" business. Since my 25' Parker was bought new, at
some point it did have only 25 hours on the engine.

You're exhibiting several of your usual problems he

1. Inability to read for content
2. Inability to read and understand context
3. Inability to see beyond your blinders

You've defined an interesting role for yourself here, Loogy...snipping
at the heels of other posters like a Pomeranian.







Better get help soon.

On 4/13/10 11:10 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:16 am, wrote:
On 4/13/10 9:54 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 13, 9:23 am, wrote:
Mine's faster and I'll bet a good amount that I use less fuel than you.

I was guesstimating the WOT speed of Herring's unused boat, Loogy for
Brains. My Parker is three feet longer than herring's boat, is much
deeper, is a deep vee and weighs at least 1000 pounds more. At WOT, the
Parker runs 40 mph, but I've only run WOT a couple of times. I have no
desire or need to run over the water at that speed.

As for your claim about your boat, well, I doubt you have a boat and if
you do, you never use it...and therefore your fuel use has to be less, eh?

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, my boat was out last weekend. Was yours? OH, and the boat you
owned before this one only had 25 hours on it according to you. And
again, you can "doubt" all you want, but you're doing so in ignorance,
you know nothing about the boats I have, and how much I use them.

1. Your boat was out last weekend...bull****.

Please provide the information you have that my boat wasn't out last
weekend.

2. The boat I owned before had only 25 hours on it...bull****.

Uh, that's what you said when you sold it, fat boy.

I love the "25 hours" business. Since my 25' Parker was bought new, at
some point it did have only 25 hours on the engine.

See above, dummy.




Yip, yip, yip...it's the ankle-snapping Loogy pomeranian.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6TgK...eature=related



--