On 11/04/2010 8:28 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 11, 10:07 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:03:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
Obama's medical device tax seems designed to kill any innovation in
medicine because American companies bidding on new licenses for med
tech has decreased.

wow. all this in 1 weeks.

OTOH, foreign companies are taking up the slack

so you will have to pay money to them for new med technology. For
example, I have no US bidders on my high resolution/low dose
mammography tech whereas I have two interested foreign companies.

aw...poor baby...

Eventually, due to Obama's foolishness, you will get this technology
from a foreign company instead of a US company. Hows that for job
growth?

gee...there are lots of reasons why no one would buy your
stuff...inferior design...inferior QC, high price, etc etc...

What will you think when Obamacare tells you that your cancer is
simply too expensive to treat with current technology but any
technology that would have made it cheaper was discouraged by Obama?

what would you do when an insurance company tells you you have a 'pre
existing condition' and denies you coverage...

nah, insurance companies would never do that, right?

I am sure bpuharic is happy Obamacare will pay to change the air in
his head.

More likely to say he is terminally stupid. No ROI in taxes for the
services.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On 11/04/2010 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:

what would you do when an insurance company tells you you have a 'pre
existing condition' and denies you coverage...

nah, insurance companies would never do that, right?


That is why you get insurance BEFORE you need it.

Otherwise it is also called FRAUD by the person who elects not to be
covered then when **** happens trys to get insurance after the fact.

--
The Liberal way, take no responsibility.

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:30:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 11/04/2010 8:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:

what would you do when an insurance company tells you you have a 'pre
existing condition' and denies you coverage...

nah, insurance companies would never do that, right?


That is why you get insurance BEFORE you need it.

quick...who's buried in grant's tomb?

you are SUCH a moron!!!

so you're insured. you move to a new state. have to get health
insurance...guess what, IDIOT...you're OUT OF LUCK!!

you know **** about ****...you're a true limball listener

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
Obama's medical device tax seems designed to kill any innovation in
medicine because American companies bidding on new licenses for med
tech has decreased. OTOH, foreign companies are taking up the slack
so you will have to pay money to them for new med technology. For
example, I have no US bidders on my high resolution/low dose
mammography tech whereas I have two interested foreign companies.
Eventually, due to Obama's foolishness, you will get this technology
from a foreign company instead of a US company. Hows that for job
growth?

Even worse, the aging boomer population both in the USA and in Europe,
Japan, China and Russia could be a huge new market for innovation in
devices to help aging people. This market alone could bring us out of
recession and give the USA a new economic edge but Obama has killed
that possibility with his medical device tax. All of that technology
will be provided by foreign companies. Great job Big O.

What will you think when Obamacare tells you that your cancer is
simply too expensive to treat with current technology but any
technology that would have made it cheaper was discouraged by Obama?


I'm happy to sign you up for a death panel review, but I think brain death
already happened.

Your wonderful invention must be really something, given it has, according
to you, no interest from anyone except "foreign companies" (who shall remain
nameless of course).

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 4/11/10 10:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
For
example, I have no US bidders on my high resolution/low dose
mammography tech whereas I have two interested foreign companies.


Perhaps potential US bidders are aware of your lack of maintenance on
your boat and your penchant for using the cheapest, rather than the
best, methodology, for repairs. I wouldn't buy a pack of shoelaces with
your "brand" them.



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Apr 12, 7:27*am, hk wrote:
On 4/11/10 10:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
* *For

example, I have no US bidders on my high resolution/low dose
mammography tech whereas I have two interested foreign companies.

Perhaps potential US bidders are aware of your lack of maintenance on
your boat and your penchant for using the cheapest, rather than the
best, methodology, for repairs. I wouldn't buy a pack of shoelaces with
your "brand" them.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Go hide in your basement with your guns, it's WAY too dangerous out in
the world.