On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and
stop listening to nut jobs.

They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and
they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work.

I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November.

Yep, need a little churn in DC. Most people have been against the big
bailout, massive debt and health care. Going to be interesting to see
how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared
and trying to duck their track records.

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and
stop listening to nut jobs.

They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and
they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work.

I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November.

Yep, need a little churn in DC. Most people have been against the big
bailout, massive debt and health care. Going to be interesting to see
how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared
and trying to duck their track records.

Big bailout.

You mean the one designed, constructed and executed by GW Bush?

On 28/03/2010 5:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and
stop listening to nut jobs.

They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and
they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work.

I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November.

Yep, need a little churn in DC. Most people have been against the big
bailout, massive debt and health care. Going to be interesting to see
how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared
and trying to duck their track records.

Big bailout.

You mean the one designed, constructed and executed by GW Bush?

Yep, the one where democrat congress/senate directed the US treasury to
create TARP and bailout the banks. And when it came down to other uses,
and Obama president elect had Bush take the heat for using it for GM &
Chrysler until Obama got in office to use it.

Yep, you got the one. And not one democrat said misappropriation of
TARP for GM & Chrysler. And ever since, as history will write it, the
Obama debt spend years. As this bailout-corruption is 100% supported by
democriters.
--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:21:12 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 5:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600,


You mean the one designed, constructed and executed by GW Bush?

Yep, the one where democrat congress/senate directed the US treasury to
create TARP and bailout the banks.

well, no. wall street has the economy gamed so we HAVE to bail them
out. it's called 'moral hazard theory' and is standard economics

you right wingers are just too stupid to know basic economics

And when it came down to other uses,
and Obama president elect had Bush take the heat for using it for GM &
Chrysler until Obama got in office to use it.

Yep, you got the one. And not one democrat said misappropriation of
TARP for GM & Chrysler. And ever since, as history will write it, the
Obama debt spend years. As this bailout-corruption is 100% supported by
democriters.

and your solution is?

oh. a financial meltdown with 25% middle class unemployment

just as long as the rich are protected

On 28/03/2010 5:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:21:12 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 5:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600,


You mean the one designed, constructed and executed by GW Bush?

Yep, the one where democrat congress/senate directed the US treasury to
create TARP and bailout the banks.

well, no. wall street has the economy gamed so we HAVE to bail them
out. it's called 'moral hazard theory' and is standard economics

you right wingers are just too stupid to know basic economics

And when it came down to other uses,
and Obama president elect had Bush take the heat for using it for GM&
Chrysler until Obama got in office to use it.

Yep, you got the one. And not one democrat said misappropriation of
TARP for GM& Chrysler. And ever since, as history will write it, the
Obama debt spend years. As this bailout-corruption is 100% supported by
democriters.

and your solution is?

oh. a financial meltdown with 25% middle class unemployment

just as long as the rich are protected


My recomendation is the same as it would be for gangrene. Chop the dead
parts off so the host survives and hopefully recovers. But by allowing
it to grow and consume more of the hosts resources, death would
otherwise occur.

This is a similar situation. Far too many resources going to the
symptoms and not enough to the cause. A death spiral.

One way or another this insane debt-spend-debt-spend cycle will end and
not a damned thing the mesiah Obama is going to do about it.

You might want to think about the next recession, I thinks we are into a
back to back recession. Numbers for new forclosures are up big time
already this year. And if interest rates don't go up you might find the
greenback becomes toilet paper.

Tough times ahead for debtors.
--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:28:27 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 5:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:21:12 -0600,
wrote:

and your solution is?

oh. a financial meltdown with 25% middle class unemployment

just as long as the rich are protected


My recomendation is the same as it would be for gangrene. Chop the dead
parts off so the host survives and hopefully recovers. But by allowing
it to grow and consume more of the hosts resources, death would
otherwise occur.

no one knows what this means. babbling..generalities...vagueness as a
solution

BUT hate the people who DO take action

One way or another this insane debt-spend-debt-spend cycle will end and
not a damned thing the mesiah Obama is going to do about it.

maybe you're right. because, again, YOU HAVE NO SOLUTION. NONE. not a
SINGLE word you said here is a solution. it's just hatred of the black
president.

and this is what the right wing is. all talk. all bull****. all
hatred.

no solutions at all except to hate those who have to take action


You might want to think about the next recession, I thinks we are into a
back to back recession. Numbers for new forclosures are up big time
already this year. And if interest rates don't go up you might find the
greenback becomes toilet paper.

Tough times ahead for debtors.

and i'm sure your ample supply of bull**** will be up to the challenge

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and
stop listening to nut jobs.

They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and
they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work.

I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November.

Yep, need a little churn in DC.

gee. the last group was churned after they burned down the economy

Most people have been against the big
bailout, massive debt and health care.

except the GOP engineered the destruction of our economy, and
engineered the bailout, all the while opposing ANY relief for the
middle class.

Going to be interesting to see
how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared
and trying to duck their track records.

yep. americans always protect the rich. it's like a law of nature.
they will return the GOP to power because the GOP is already telling
us that wall street needs lower taxes and lower wages for the middle
class

On 28/03/2010 5:42 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and
stop listening to nut jobs.

They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and
they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work.

I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November.

Yep, need a little churn in DC.

gee. the last group was churned after they burned down the economy

Most people have been against the big
bailout, massive debt and health care.

except the GOP engineered the destruction of our economy, and
engineered the bailout, all the while opposing ANY relief for the
middle class.

Going to be interesting to see
how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared
and trying to duck their track records.

yep. americans always protect the rich. it's like a law of nature.
they will return the GOP to power because the GOP is already telling
us that wall street needs lower taxes and lower wages for the middle
class

No need to protect the rich. Since they didn't over extend themselves,
saved during fat times, losing a job was just an event like a rainy day.
Like when I got the RIF in 2008. Had a job 2 weeks after I started
looking, my wife was bored of my being at home.

But to debt mongers, losing a job is a wipeout. You know the type, they
become bitter, selfish and envious of those with money.

The reality is many a hype talkers, BSers and debt mongers are getting
wiped out slowly, but surely. But those having conservative financial
values are doing quite well.

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:37:07 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 5:42 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600,
wrote:
except the GOP engineered the destruction of our economy, and
engineered the bailout, all the while opposing ANY relief for the
middle class.

Going to be interesting to see
how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared
and trying to duck their track records.

yep. americans always protect the rich. it's like a law of nature.
they will return the GOP to power because the GOP is already telling
us that wall street needs lower taxes and lower wages for the middle
class

No need to protect the rich. Since they didn't over extend themselves,
saved during fat times, losing a job was just an event like a rainy day.

really? did they? then why did we have to bail out the banks?

you seem to have forgotten that piece of the action.

and they DIDN"T save you IDIOT. they engineered the tax system so they
dont pay taxes and WE DO.

you right wingers...too stupid to examine your own basic myths. to
you, the rich are infallible...perfect...they got rich not by tax
breaks or stealing from the middle class, but by hard work

if THAT'S the case...then

WHY DID WE HAVE TO BAIL THEM OUT?

you're kinda stupid. even when confronted with MASSIVE EVIDENCE that
your BELIEF FAILED you refuse to believe it

Like when I got the RIF in 2008. Had a job 2 weeks after I started
looking, my wife was bored of my being at home.

But to debt mongers, losing a job is a wipeout. You know the type, they
become bitter, selfish and envious of those with money.

yeah. just like the rich envies what little money the middle class has
so destroys our pensions, destroys our 401K's etc.


The reality is many a hype talkers, BSers and debt mongers are getting
wiped out slowly, but surely. But those having conservative financial
values are doing quite well.

reallity?

you wouldnt know it if it bit you in the ass

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 28/03/2010 5:42 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:58 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/03/2010 4:16 PM, hk wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


They might get a majority in the next 20 years if they wise up and
stop listening to nut jobs.

They, the Republicans, are not representing their constituents, and
they're certainly not doing them any service by refusing to do work.

I'm afraid our guys are going to get trounced come November.

Yep, need a little churn in DC.

gee. the last group was churned after they burned down the economy

Most people have been against the big
bailout, massive debt and health care.

except the GOP engineered the destruction of our economy, and
engineered the bailout, all the while opposing ANY relief for the
middle class.

Going to be interesting to see
how the democriters do at poll time. Most are already running scared
and trying to duck their track records.

yep. americans always protect the rich. it's like a law of nature.
they will return the GOP to power because the GOP is already telling
us that wall street needs lower taxes and lower wages for the middle
class

No need to protect the rich. Since they didn't over extend themselves,
saved during fat times, losing a job was just an event like a rainy day.
Like when I got the RIF in 2008. Had a job 2 weeks after I started
looking, my wife was bored of my being at home.

But to debt mongers, losing a job is a wipeout. You know the type, they
become bitter, selfish and envious of those with money.

The reality is many a hype talkers, BSers and debt mongers are getting
wiped out slowly, but surely. But those having conservative financial
values are doing quite well.

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.


You dolt... Bernie Maddoff. Didn't "over extend" himself???

--
Nom=de=Plume