On Mar 27, 3:19*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:34:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
Lefties are attacking citizens again.

so far we have the right lying about eric cantor's office being
attacked...a fact they didn't even admit until police forced them to
admit it...

now they're making up stuff about other events.

the right...lies as if it's an olympic sport

* All you hear about in the media is

about “alleged” threats to Dems in which there is no evidence at all..
When some audio of the alleged incidents surfaces, the Dems back off
or stop talking about it. *Meanwhile they are escalating their attacks
on any opposition. *How many attacks do Obama opponents have to endure
before the media decides to report on them?

evidence that the left is violent?

none. none at all.

bpuharic repeats his lie about Eric Cantor. Cantors office did have a
bullet hole and Cantor did get threats. These are facts. Cantor did
not say the bullet was from any Dems, I did and I still believe it is
probably true, the coincidence is simply to extreme otherwise.
bpuharic needs to "man-up" and admit Cantor did not lie.

In article 0104707a-1b9e-4d4c-8c56-941ad1895540
@u22g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...

On Mar 27, 3:19*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:34:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
Lefties are attacking citizens again.

so far we have the right lying about eric cantor's office being
attacked...a fact they didn't even admit until police forced them to
admit it...

now they're making up stuff about other events.

the right...lies as if it's an olympic sport

* All you hear about in the media is

about ?alleged? threats to Dems in which there is no evidence at all.
When some audio of the alleged incidents surfaces, the Dems back off
or stop talking about it. *Meanwhile they are escalating their attacks
on any opposition. *How many attacks do Obama opponents have to endure
before the media decides to report on them?

evidence that the left is violent?

none. none at all.

bpuharic repeats his lie about Eric Cantor. Cantors office did have a
bullet hole and Cantor did get threats. These are facts. Cantor did
not say the bullet was from any Dems, I did and I still believe it is
probably true, the coincidence is simply to extreme otherwise.
bpuharic needs to "man-up" and admit Cantor did not lie.

Why would Eric Cantor lie about anything?
He's a Republican Representative looking out for the folks.
No reason for him to lie about anything.

On Mar 27, 3:43*pm, Peter Prick wrote:
In article 0104707a-1b9e-4d4c-8c56-941ad1895540
@u22g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...





On Mar 27, 3:19 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:34:44 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
Lefties are attacking citizens again.

so far we have the right lying about eric cantor's office being
attacked...a fact they didn't even admit until police forced them to
admit it...

now they're making up stuff about other events.

the right...lies as if it's an olympic sport

All you hear about in the media is

about ?alleged? threats to Dems in which there is no evidence at all..
When some audio of the alleged incidents surfaces, the Dems back off
or stop talking about it. Meanwhile they are escalating their attacks
on any opposition. How many attacks do Obama opponents have to endure
before the media decides to report on them?

evidence that the left is violent?

none. none at all.

bpuharic repeats his lie about Eric Cantor. *Cantors office did have a
bullet hole and Cantor did get *threats. *These are facts. *Cantor did
not say the bullet was from any Dems, I did and I still believe it is
probably true, the coincidence is simply to extreme otherwise.
bpuharic needs to "man-up" and admit Cantor did not lie.

Why would Eric Cantor lie about anything?
He's a Republican Representative looking out for the folks.
No reason for him to lie about anything.

Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to
kill 20 million Americans, etc.

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:



Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to
kill 20 million Americans, etc.

none of whom, except ayers, was american.

and tim mcveigh WAS american. and he was the greatest american
terrorist in history

and he was far right

the guy who killed 3 pittsburgh police officers...my hometown...last
year...was far right.

60 incidents of far right violence in the last 10 years.

i personally have seen it as a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic.

and froggie is so delusional he says it doesn't exist

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to
kill 20 million Americans, etc.

none of whom, except ayers, was american.

and tim mcveigh WAS american. and he was the greatest american
terrorist in history

and he was far right

the guy who killed 3 pittsburgh police officers...my hometown...last
year...was far right.

60 incidents of far right violence in the last 10 years.

i personally have seen it as a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic.

and froggie is so delusional he says it doesn't exist


Are you done?

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:00:42 -0500, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to
kill 20 million Americans, etc.

none of whom, except ayers, was american.

and tim mcveigh WAS american. and he was the greatest american
terrorist in history

and he was far right

the guy who killed 3 pittsburgh police officers...my hometown...last
year...was far right.

60 incidents of far right violence in the last 10 years.

i personally have seen it as a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic.

and froggie is so delusional he says it doesn't exist


Are you done?

depends

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent: Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill 20
million Americans, etc.

LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death of many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent: Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill 20
million Americans, etc.

LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death of many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.


It's sad that some people are unable to understand things in a historical
perspective to the point of making threats and causing violence. If there's
anything that scares me more than the threats against our elected officials
more, I can't think of it. Doesn't matter if the person is on the right or
the left of a debate. There's no excuse for threatening violence. Comments
like baby killer, and time to reload, and spitting on people, and yelling
expletives have no place in our society. I vehemently disagree with the
hubris of Stupak, but to wish him dead? I dislike Rush more than I can say,
but I would much rather patiently wait for him to stroke out than call for
violence, even though that's what he promotes. I wouldn't spit on a dog I
didn't like (and I don't like many) no less a human being.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 3/28/10 2:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent: Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill 20
million Americans, etc.

LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death of many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.


It's sad that some people are unable to understand things in a historical
perspective to the point of making threats and causing violence. If there's
anything that scares me more than the threats against our elected officials
more, I can't think of it. Doesn't matter if the person is on the right or
the left of a debate. There's no excuse for threatening violence. Comments
like baby killer, and time to reload, and spitting on people, and yelling
expletives have no place in our society. I vehemently disagree with the
hubris of Stupak, but to wish him dead? I dislike Rush more than I can say,
but I would much rather patiently wait for him to stroke out than call for
violence, even though that's what he promotes. I wouldn't spit on a dog I
didn't like (and I don't like many) no less a human being.



Indeed...I, too, am waiting for Rush to "stroke out," hopefully while he
is on the air.


--
Conservatives - just pretend Obama's health care legislation is another
unnecessary war and you'll feel better about it.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent: Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill 20
million Americans, etc.
LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death of many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.


It's sad that some people are unable to understand things in a historical
perspective to the point of making threats and causing violence. If there's
anything that scares me more than the threats against our elected officials
more, I can't think of it. Doesn't matter if the person is on the right or
the left of a debate. There's no excuse for threatening violence. Comments
like baby killer, and time to reload, and spitting on people, and yelling
expletives have no place in our society. I vehemently disagree with the
hubris of Stupak, but to wish him dead? I dislike Rush more than I can say,
but I would much rather patiently wait for him to stroke out than call for
violence, even though that's what he promotes. I wouldn't spit on a dog I
didn't like (and I don't like many) no less a human being.


Welcome back!
I've done some work getting Walker Bay info together for you in
anticipation of your return. Too much info to post here.
Just e-mail me.
Oh. Hope your trip went well, and welcome back!
And I agree with what you said above.
Very perceptive. I appreciate your sensitivity in judging this type of
issue. Your legal training shines through.
Ok, enough. Don't want to appear too "gushing" in my praise.
Wouldn't be prudent.