On Mar 3, 2:38*pm, anon-e-moose wrote:
*e#c wrote:
On 3/3/2010 12:24 PM, Harry wrote:
On 3/3/10 11:47 AM, Jack wrote:
On Mar 3, 10:35 am, wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 3/3/10 10:22 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 3/3/10 9:49 AM, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:

Palin at best has a mediocre rack. She's also short and
short-waisted,
and her face without makeup really shows her age.

You win the "Gratuitous Shallow Comment of the Day Award."
Be proud.

Thank you; I am. I was commenting on someone else's comment about
Palin's "beauty." She's a woofer.

What makes you an expert on beauty. I heard you have quite a woofer
companion yourself.

You've "heard" a photo of my wife? Figures...

Don't get all hooky falooky now. It was just a rumor. What's this about
a photo? If you feel daring go ahead and post it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

He did a few years ago... she was holding a fish on the old Yo-Ho. It
wasn't up for long, but I'll bet someone grabbed it. Quite
embarrasing.

Sorry, Jackoff, but what you are describing was not a photo of my wife,
just a photo of a boat guest.

So are you saying the photo you posted on Eisboch's web site was not
your wife?

Obviously, the guest was better looking than the one with Irish skin.

Actually, the "guest" was dumpy, frumpy, and lumpy. And back then, he
claimed it was his wife. He pulled the photo very quickly.

Isn't Irish skin typically freckled, as in red-heads?