"John H" wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:38:34 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

Herring's density knows no bounds.

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

On Feb 14, 3:57*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John *wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. *Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. *Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 3:57 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts


Yet more lies and blaming on everyone but Bush/Cheney (the torture
promoter).
--
Nom=de=Plume

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:21:23 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 3:57 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts


Yet more lies and blaming on everyone but Bush/Cheney (the torture
promoter).

WAFJ(oke)

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:21:23 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 3:57 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC
when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts


Yet more lies and blaming on everyone but Bush/Cheney (the torture
promoter).

WAFJ(oke)


I guess you don't watch the news...

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


--
Nom=de=Plume

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.