"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


--
Nom=de=Plume

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:50 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq


So is it OK that Obama does it because he is black or is it democrat?

LMAO...liberals are pathetic at rationalization.


Obama is responsible for the deaths of 100s of 1000s of Iragis??????? On
what planet?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Canuck57 wrote:
On 14/02/2010 12:50 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq


So is it OK that Obama does it because he is black or is it democrat?

LMAO...liberals are pathetic at rationalization.
He's half black.

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.

Nor was it Bush's fault that Clinton railed about Saddam and his weapons of mass
destruction.

Liberal selective memory, or mammary in nindepoop's case.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:50:55 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq

Well hey, if Bush did it, then it must be OK for Obama to do it! I wonder why
y'all were doing all the yelling when it happened during the Bush years? Because
it was wrong, or because it was Bush? Hypocrites.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

On 14/02/2010 2:56 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:53:20 -0700,
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:50 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq


So is it OK that Obama does it because he is black or is it democrat?

LMAO...liberals are pathetic at rationalization.

and right wingers are great at cowardice. they murder hundreds of
thousands in a useless war

then complain about a president who IS trying to protect america.

figures

I would say if I was Osama Bin Laden, I would put the quiet word out to
leave Obama alone, he is doing the work of Islam by taking down the
affluent infidels of America. He is doing more damage than we could
ever do.

Obama's economic advice is obviously tainted by a toxic liberal-statism
big government. Quite predictable actually. With a study of Obama, the
fast track boy appealed to democrat, liberal statists and shot to the
top without ever having been to a baseball game before the age of 12.

Yet people fail to see correlations in the corruption and mesiah
madness. The same crap Adolph Hitler pulled in the earlier years, Obama
is doing today. Good at deflecting blame for alterior motives. But if
I was an American, I would seriously question the deterioration of
values of the US government itself.

Go ahead, be a good little sheeple and follow Obama to hell. The road
to hell is paved with good intentions and you will have lots of company.
Because as much as I don't like the idea, I can't see this depression
ending soon and even if it abates for a bit, it will not last long.

Bad debtors always go down, the only question is how many good people it
takes with it.

On 14/02/2010 3:21 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:50 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq


So is it OK that Obama does it because he is black or is it democrat?

LMAO...liberals are pathetic at rationalization.


Obama is responsible for the deaths of 100s of 1000s of Iragis??????? On
what planet?

Has had 13 onths to stop it. And Obama big mouth himself did say at one
point he would end it. I guess you haven't caught on that Obama is not
a man of his word. A polished liar I can believe.

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:49:02 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.

Nor was it Bush's fault that Clinton railed about Saddam and his weapons of mass
destruction.

Liberal selective memory, or mammary in nindepoop's case.

Here, Liberals, refresh your memory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ...eature=related
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:49:02 -0500, John H
wrote:



Nor was it Bush's fault that Clinton railed about Saddam and his weapons of mass
destruction.

gee. and how many troops did clinton send to invade iraq?

oh. none.


Liberal selective memory, or mammary in nindepoop's case.

guess the right winger forgot that colin powell admitted he'd been
lied to by bush.

oh well...right wingers lie and then are shocked...SHOCKED!! to find
out their lies are lies