On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:32:49 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:32:11 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


the ruling was not correct. if it had been, it would have been 9-0.

it allows al qaida to buy air time to influence elections. but, then,
a conservativet, as lenin said, would sell someone the rope they'd use
to hang him



So any ruling not 9-0 is wrong? Seems if most of the SCOTUS rulings are
wrong according to you.

well it certainly shows that those who disagree with the ruling have
some judicial support. doesn't it?

"CalifBill" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:32:11 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is
to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...-at-obama.html

--
Nom=de=Plume


Even more, Obama should resign for criticizing the SCOTUS during the
State
of the Union Speech. Unprecedented! Trying to influence future rulings.
The ruling was correct, regarding the constitutionality of the law
according
to real constitutional scholars.

the ruling was not correct. if it had been, it would have been 9-0.

it allows al qaida to buy air time to influence elections. but, then,
a conservativet, as lenin said, would sell someone the rope they'd use
to hang him



So any ruling not 9-0 is wrong? Seems if most of the SCOTUS rulings are
wrong according to you.



So, I guess you think it's ok for al quaida to buy air time, etc. Wow.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"CalifBill" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:32:11 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address
is to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...-at-obama.html

--
Nom=de=Plume


Even more, Obama should resign for criticizing the SCOTUS during the
State
of the Union Speech. Unprecedented! Trying to influence future
rulings.
The ruling was correct, regarding the constitutionality of the law
according
to real constitutional scholars.

the ruling was not correct. if it had been, it would have been 9-0.

it allows al qaida to buy air time to influence elections. but, then,
a conservativet, as lenin said, would sell someone the rope they'd use
to hang him



So any ruling not 9-0 is wrong? Seems if most of the SCOTUS rulings are
wrong according to you.



So, I guess you think it's ok for al quaida to buy air time, etc. Wow.

--
Nom=de=Plume
If they meet the legal requirements. Free speech.

"CalifBill" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"CalifBill" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:32:11 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address
is to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...-at-obama.html

--
Nom=de=Plume


Even more, Obama should resign for criticizing the SCOTUS during the
State
of the Union Speech. Unprecedented! Trying to influence future
rulings.
The ruling was correct, regarding the constitutionality of the law
according
to real constitutional scholars.

the ruling was not correct. if it had been, it would have been 9-0.

it allows al qaida to buy air time to influence elections. but, then,
a conservativet, as lenin said, would sell someone the rope they'd use
to hang him



So any ruling not 9-0 is wrong? Seems if most of the SCOTUS rulings are
wrong according to you.



So, I guess you think it's ok for al quaida to buy air time, etc. Wow.

--
Nom=de=Plume

If they meet the legal requirements. Free speech.

Right. Sure. First we have to torture them though...

--
Nom=de=Plume

Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...-at-obama.html

--
Nom=de=Plume


Even more, Obama should resign for criticizing the SCOTUS during the State
of the Union Speech. Unprecedented! Trying to influence future rulings.
The ruling was correct, regarding the constitutionality of the law according
to real constitutional scholars.


No doubt that it will influence future rulings. Meet the new
conservative SCOTUS.