| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
wrote in message
... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. Last warning skank. Answer the mans question if you can. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
Harry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. Last warning skank. Answer the mans question if you can. I'm sorry nom=de=plume. Didn't mean to be disrespectful. When I post as Harry I forget my morality, and who I am. Since I think you're a ditz on many points, I should have just ignored you or respectfully disagreed point by point. It's this Harry thing. Didn't mean to carry it onto you. Sorry. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Sismple question. Why not leave now? They are going to kill each other after we leave, they kill each other now. So why not now? Beyond your comprehension? |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
On 2/4/10 1:23 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Sismple question. Why not leave now? They are going to kill each other after we leave, they kill each other now. So why not now? Beyond your comprehension? We should pull our troops and send in all our right-wing religious fundies to fight the taliban and the rest of the religious crackpots over there. Our crackpots vs. their crackpots...works for me. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Sismple question. Why not leave now? They are going to kill each other after we leave, they kill each other now. So why not now? Beyond your comprehension? It's a simple question, which I already answered, not to mention the generals in charge who've answered it. I guess that's beyond your comprehension. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Sismple question. Why not leave now? They are going to kill each other after we leave, they kill each other now. So why not now? Beyond your comprehension? It's a simple question, which I already answered, not to mention the generals in charge who've answered it. I guess that's beyond your comprehension. -- Nom=de=Plume Moron. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
that ******* criticizes previous administration!!!
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:21:35 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Get the hell out and let the big dog eat. We are not in Iran and they look like they are going to throw out the mullahs all on their own (perhaps with a little covert help from the CIA) Basically, you're saying that even though we broke it, we'll let a massacre take place and that's ok. It isn't. I don't think there is a "fix". These people will have to work out their own problems. We are just prolonging the agony. I agree. There's no complete fix, but we certainly have the obligation to make the situation better. Just leaving isn't the best option for either them or us. -- Nom=de=Plume Why not? Try reading the thread or get someone to read it for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Sismple question. Why not leave now? They are going to kill each other after we leave, they kill each other now. So why not now? Beyond your comprehension? It's a simple question, which I already answered, not to mention the generals in charge who've answered it. I guess that's beyond your comprehension. -- Nom=de=Plume Moron. Yes, you are. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
