| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 24, 7:39*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. -- Nom=de=Plume Avez-vous pensé ceci étiez-vous du Français d'aile du nez de classe ? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Just for the Record... | General | |||
| Just for the Record... | General | |||
| Just for the record... | General | |||
| For the Record...the real record! | ASA | |||
| new record | ASA | |||