| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 95d4a075-f40f-4958-bd58-ab408d771df1 @c4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 24, 5:23 pm, Harry wrote: I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty Wrong again, ****forbrains...I've been in downtown DC since shortly after noon, at a museum. Got back at 5:30 or so. Besides, ID spoofing is the game you right-wing nitwits play every day. Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. The idea for him is to be quoted and addressed directly. I don't bother. Like most here, I have Harry pinned for years. Scotty Liar, liar, short pants on fire. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty More indication that you're not too bright? Besides, which Harry? -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
nom=de=plume wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty More indication that you're not too bright? Besides, which Harry? Not me, the "real" Harry. It's the righties who engage in the ID spoofing every day. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 6:14*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in ... In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty More indication that you're not too bright? Besides, which Harry? -- Nom=de=Plume D'Plume, unlike you, he is average where you are not. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
"John H" wrote in message
... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:39:40 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. I wan't aware that the tone was critical. Just a spot of fun there. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:39:40 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message m... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. I wan't aware that the tone was critical. Just a spot of fun there. Ok, well, you sure did go on about it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 7:39*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. -- Nom=de=Plume Avez-vous pensé ceci étiez-vous du Français d'aile du nez de classe ? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Just for the Record... | General | |||
| Just for the Record... | General | |||
| Just for the record... | General | |||
| For the Record...the real record! | ASA | |||
| new record | ASA | |||
![Harry[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
