"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 20, 12:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
messagenews:6sasi5pjqadv4h28019s4oomeegs5st3uh@4ax .com...



On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:16:44 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Dec 19, 9:44 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially, politically-created
market...."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...s-cap-trade-re...

Huh - how about that...

It's amazing how your side can cherry pick people's thoughts and
present just that as fact and expect everyone to eat it up. I know
that many on the right will, afterall, they'll take some lie that
Hannity or Rush tells them and run with it as the truth too.

I have come to know you on a personal level over the past few months -
you're a good guy - a little weird, but then again, most of us are on
some way.

But this kind of reply bothers me. "Cherry pick"? It's not "cherry"
picking at all - it's a fact. Fraud is rampant - something that I've
been pointing out for years. This isn't "cherry" picking - it's
governments actively creating a market that is basically unregulated
and uncontrollable and, frankly, unsupported unless you count
government money backing the concept.

Wake up man - this is all about economic control and the ones who play
along get to play. It's the Robber Baron economy all over again.

No, fraud is not "rampant." Fraud exists in most programs.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Then, D'Plume. You think that fraud can be measured? Tell us, how
much fraud must be in each programme to be classified as "rampant?

We rely on your vastly advantageous and expedient knowledge.


Instead of being a little sh*t, why don't you try being polite for once.

Of course, fraud can be measured. It's measured all the time.

--
Nom=de=Plume