nom=de=plume wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 20, 11:11 am, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article 8ab39275-4f53-4342-be57-97ae507a3f19
@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...







On Dec 20, 8:32 am, Jack wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:16 am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 19, 9:44 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
"This is the problem with politicians trying to create a market
for
something that the free market otherwise doesn't value," Schulz
said.
"An emissions trading market is an artificially,
politically-created
market...."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...s-cap-trade-re...
Huh - how about that...
It's amazing how your side can cherry pick people's thoughts and
present just that as fact and expect everyone to eat it up. I know
that many on the right will, afterall, they'll take some lie that
Hannity or Rush tells them and run with it as the truth too.
So instead of attacking the messenger, which is your side's MO, how
about addressing the quotation. Specifically, what part of it isn't
true, and why?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Easy! First, if you read the whole article, not just the cherry
picked
parts, you'll see that they are discussing Europe's cap and trade
problems saying that we will have the same problems. This without
even
knowing how we are going to model our system. Pretty audacious if the
right wing thinks that their side can predict the future.
If you look at the Czars and others President Obama has put in charge
of
such policy, you can get a pretty good idea, it's not rocket
science...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
What in HELL does that have to do with the right acting like they have
the ability to predict the future? They've done it before too. Look at
healthcare. For some stupid reason, they think it will be like the
UK's plan. They'll bring up the failed systems and say, "see, that's
what it will be like for us". You NEVER see them point to a well
though out system that works very well and say "see, that's what it
will be like for us"......
Why? PURE politics. They would rather play politics than do what's
right for the country.
Will "it" work as "well" as Medicare? 8)

I'm sure you're first in line to voluntarily give it up. And, if not you,
I'm sure you'll be happy to volunteer your family members to do that.


My point is the amount of fraud brought to Medicare. The Government
cannot seem to control it. Will they be able to control the inevitable
fraud that will be associated with "cap and trade"?


The gov't can't control it because the fraud investigators have not been
given the resources to deal with it.

As I said, there's always fraud around. So, your question really is a non
sequitur.


One guess as to why the Gov't WON'T control fraud.

--


Imagine being such a worthless p.o.s. that you post on usenet using
someone else's ID