"Steve B" wrote in message
...


Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially
Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like
transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to
cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who
gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from
there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in
an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the
middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are
energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while
indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the
little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you
educated into it?

Steve

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd
world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with
it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...


Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially
Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like
transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to
cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And
who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on
from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when
flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming
conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting
that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear
more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But
that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this
stupid, or were you educated into it?

Steve

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd
world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with
it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...


Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially
Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like
transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to
cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And
who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on
from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when
flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming
conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting
that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear
more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But
that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this
stupid, or were you educated into it?

Steve

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal
with it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'.

Hey chickens are the descendents of dinosaurs, and some of these people are
really afraid, so it kinda fits.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Don White wrote:
wrote in message

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd
world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with
it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'.



Don't try to *think* - that's your problem.

"Rob" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd
world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal
with
it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'.



Don't try to *think* - that's your problem.


And Rob is an _expert_ when it comes to trying to think and having problems
doing so! (some lovin for ya for Xmas)

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

wrote in message


Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd
world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal
with
it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume


I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'.




Don't try to *think* - that's your problem.


And Rob is an _expert_ when it comes to trying to think and having problems
doing so! (some lovin for ya for Xmas)


Nice!

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...


Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially
Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like
transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to
cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And
who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on
from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when
flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming
conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting
that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear
more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But
that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this
stupid, or were you educated into it?

Steve

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal
with it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all
children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two,
there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting
parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a
higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as
we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I
won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life
where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though
I was right.

I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the
injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line
once more expecting fairness and justice.

So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and
governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east
when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up
hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil.
There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to
insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated.

We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and
burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not
notice?

I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so
ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion.

Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is
over.

Steve

"Steve B" wrote in message
...

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...


Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially
Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like
transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going
to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from?
And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It
goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking
action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global
warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're
spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the
thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in
transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower
class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it?

Steve

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to
deal with it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all
children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair.
Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying
interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense
that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or
truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can
have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had
situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got
no justice even though I was right.

I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the
injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line
once more expecting fairness and justice.

So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and
governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east
when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended
up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap
oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try
to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated.

We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash
and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you
not notice?

I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so
ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion.

Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is
over.

Steve



Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done"
with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve B" wrote in message
...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...

Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially
Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like
transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going
to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from?
And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It
goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking
action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global
warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're
spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the
thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in
transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower
class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it?

Steve
Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to
deal with it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume
The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all
children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair.
Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying
interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense
that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or
truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can
have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had
situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got
no justice even though I was right.

I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the
injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line
once more expecting fairness and justice.

So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and
governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east
when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended
up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap
oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try
to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated.

We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash
and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you
not notice?

I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so
ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion.

Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is
over.

Steve



Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done"
with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you.

Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the
top also.

In article ,
says...
Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done"
with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you.

Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the
top also.

Do you kiss you're, just for you Donnie, mother with that mouth?