On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Sounds reasonable and rational. And you don't agree.

That's not a great surprise.

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Depends on what's most important, job security or integrity.
Fox doesn't take kindly to those who disagree with the memo.
Accu-Weather can be replaced.
Plenty of other weather outfits.

--Vic

"but does this mean that man is causing global warming?"

Didn't we just go through this a while back with the ozone layer?

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

THE SKY IS FALLING!

I can and do believe that there was some causality the ozone layer. But
this thing about carbon dioxide is just a way to transfer wealth under the
guise of doing good. Nothing is going to change. We're just going to give
some poor countries money we don't have so they can have token pollution
control. It's that simple.

Steve

On Dec 18, 8:42*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"but does this mean that man is causing global warming?"

Didn't we just go through this a while back with the ozone layer?

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

THE SKY IS FALLING!

I can and do believe that there was some causality the ozone layer. *But
this thing about carbon dioxide is just a way to transfer wealth under the
guise of doing good. *Nothing is going to change. *We're just going to give
some poor countries money we don't have so they can have token pollution
control. *It's that simple.

Steve

And we will have higher taxes and more government agencies to handle
the transfer. There really are black helicopters out there.

On Dec 18, 7:02*pm, John H wrote:

And we will have higher taxes and more government agencies to handle
the transfer. There really are black helicopters out there.


Oh, man! You got that right, John!

i see 'em all the time!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSlutmu-xiI

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 8:42 pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"but does this mean that man is causing global warming?"

Didn't we just go through this a while back with the ozone layer?

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

THE SKY IS FALLING!

I can and do believe that there was some causality the ozone layer.
But
this thing about carbon dioxide is just a way to transfer wealth under the
guise of doing good. Nothing is going to change. We're just going to give
some poor countries money we don't have so they can have token pollution
control. It's that simple.

Steve

And we will have higher taxes and more government agencies to handle
the transfer. There really are black helicopters out there.

reply: I lived through the Viet Nam era. Graduated high school in 1966.
GI's were coming back with a lot of talk about unilaterilism, one world
government, survivalism, stocking up arms and ammo, having a self sustaining
lifestyle, and all manner of kook things. Mostly anti-government,
conspiracies, and the world run by a few fat old men in back rooms smoking
cigars and chanting Templar incantations.

Now they don't seem so kooky.

Steve

In article 6ca2a66c-7f16-442e-9346-
, says...

On Dec 18, 8:42*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"but does this mean that man is causing global warming?"

Didn't we just go through this a while back with the ozone layer?

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

THE SKY IS FALLING!

I can and do believe that there was some causality the ozone layer. *But
this thing about carbon dioxide is just a way to transfer wealth under the
guise of doing good. *Nothing is going to change. *We're just going to give
some poor countries money we don't have so they can have token pollution
control. *It's that simple.

Steve

And we will have higher taxes and more government agencies to handle
the transfer. There really are black helicopters out there.

Yeah, and they are carrying bags of cash..

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Depends on what's most important, job security or integrity.
Fox doesn't take kindly to those who disagree with the memo.
Accu-Weather can be replaced.
Plenty of other weather outfits.

--Vic

Yeah, when I want both sides of an issue I don't turn of FOX where there
are always representatives from both sides, I turn on MSNBC or NPR and
hear both sides from one point of view... That's funny Vic... So answer
the question Saran didn't, where do you get your news?

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:09:16 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Depends on what's most important, job security or integrity.
Fox doesn't take kindly to those who disagree with the memo.
Accu-Weather can be replaced.
Plenty of other weather outfits.

--Vic

Yeah, when I want both sides of an issue I don't turn of FOX where there
are always representatives from both sides, I turn on MSNBC or NPR and
hear both sides from one point of view... That's funny Vic... So answer
the question Saran didn't, where do you get your news?

Mostly cable TV. Fox, C-Span, CNN, MSNBC.
But I also read actual legislation and random political commentary on
the internet.
I leave the scientific stuff to the scientists.
They'll work it out.
You saying Fox is neutral on the global warming stuff?
I don't get that impression. The memo has been distributed.
Talking heads reading what they're told to read from the prompter.
Lots of blondes. Real climate scientists right there. Oh yeah.
And nobody here strikes me as a ****ing climate scientist either.
I don't care what side they take.
Bet some are lucky enough to keep their boats afloat.
Some real good cut-and-pasters though.
Sorry. That's how I see it. No offense.
But I won't go so far as to act like those Senators do to people they
despise, and say "My dear friend and colleague."
Hehe. You know what I mean.

--Vic

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:09:16 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Depends on what's most important, job security or integrity.
Fox doesn't take kindly to those who disagree with the memo.
Accu-Weather can be replaced.
Plenty of other weather outfits.

--Vic

Yeah, when I want both sides of an issue I don't turn of FOX where there
are always representatives from both sides, I turn on MSNBC or NPR and
hear both sides from one point of view... That's funny Vic... So answer
the question Saran didn't, where do you get your news?

Mostly cable TV. Fox, C-Span, CNN, MSNBC.
But I also read actual legislation and random political commentary on
the internet.
I leave the scientific stuff to the scientists.
They'll work it out.
You saying Fox is neutral on the global warming stuff?
I don't get that impression. The memo has been distributed.
Talking heads reading what they're told to read from the prompter.
Lots of blondes. Real climate scientists right there. Oh yeah.
And nobody here strikes me as a ****ing climate scientist either.
I don't care what side they take.
Bet some are lucky enough to keep their boats afloat.
Some real good cut-and-pasters though.
Sorry. That's how I see it. No offense.
But I won't go so far as to act like those Senators do to people they
despise, and say "My dear friend and colleague."
Hehe. You know what I mean.

--Vic

Thanks Vic, my dear friend and colleague