![]() |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
And to think many on the right believe every word he utters....
Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On 12/18/09 10:09 AM, mmc wrote:
wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. The right here and elsewhere resembles the Borg collective. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 18, 10:09*am, "mmc" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. Copenhagen, not Geneva. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:09:09 -0500, "mmc" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. It's good to see y'all are such ardent Hannity fans. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:33:26 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. Copenhagen, not Geneva. reply: Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation. Geneva. That's rich. Steve Wonder what else got dicked up. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:33:26 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. Copenhagen, not Geneva. reply: Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation. Geneva. That's rich. Steve That's rich? The distance between Geneva to Copenhagen is about the same as Salt Lake to Hayden Lake. You'd be real comfy there. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 18, 10:44*am, John H wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:33:26 -0800, "Steve B" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message .... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. Copenhagen, not Geneva. reply: Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation. Geneva. *That's rich. Steve Wonder what else got dicked up. -- You. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. Copenhagen, not Geneva. reply: Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation. Geneva. That's rich. Steve |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 18, 11:33*am, "Steve B" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... And to think many on the right believe every word he utters.... Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of course. One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line. Copenhagen, not Geneva. reply: Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation. Geneva. *That's rich. Steve- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, yeah, typical right winger, attack the messenger instead of the message. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com