This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve B" wrote in message
...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...

Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is
essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits?
Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name.
All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that
money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton.
Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be
talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream
jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a
blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy
hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while
indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for
the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or
were you educated into it?

Steve
Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations
destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on
their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume
The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all
children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair.
Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying
interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense
that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll
or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that
we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have
had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick,
and got no justice even though I was right.

I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract
the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall
in line once more expecting fairness and justice.

So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics
and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle
east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all
ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell
us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became
involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the
villains and hated.

We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash
and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you
not notice?

I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so
ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion.

Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation
is over.

Steve



Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one
"done" with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you.

Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the
top also.

** Jackass alert**..... spoofing real people.



It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim.

--
Nom=de=Plume

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"Steve B" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Steve B" wrote in message
...


Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is
essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits?
Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name.
All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that
money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton.
Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking
about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and
having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard.
Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and
need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and
use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little
people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you
educated into it?

Steve

Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to
deal with it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all
children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair.
Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying
interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense
that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll
or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we
can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had
situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and
got no justice even though I was right.

I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the
injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in
line once more expecting fairness and justice.

So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics
and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle
east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all
ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell
us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became
involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the
villains and hated.

We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash
and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you
not notice?

I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so
ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion.

Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is
over.

Steve

Hey numbnuts...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at
the top also.


Apologies. Your point is well taken. Sometimes we hit the SEND button
too quickly. Hang around. If you're here any length of time, it will
eventually happen to you, too. ;-)

Steve



If you're actually addressing me... I didn't write that. It's some child,
apparently.


--
Nom=de=Plume

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 21, 11:21 am, "Don wrote:

"Steve wrote in message

...








"Don wrote in message
...


wrote in message
...

"Steve wrote in message
...


Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the
environment
isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act.


--
Nom=de=Plume


Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the
situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve
hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially
Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like
transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going
to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from?
And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It
goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking
action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global
warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're
spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the
thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in
transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower
class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it?


Steve


Technology is part of the answer, obviously.


Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to
deal with it. Yes, that seems fair.


Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?


--
Nom=de=Plume


The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all
children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair.
Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying
interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense
that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or
truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can
have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had
situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got
no justice even though I was right.


I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the
injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line
once more expecting fairness and justice.


So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and
governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east
when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended
up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap
oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try
to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated.


We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash
and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you
not notice?


I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so
ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion.


Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is
over.


Steve

Hey numbnuts...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the
top also.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nice name calling Don. Did your suck buddy Harry teach you that? No
isn't time to fetch your son some more beer?

It's *always* time to fetch the "boy" beer!

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

wrote in message


Technology is part of the answer, obviously.

Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying
3rd
world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal
with
it. Yes, that seems fair.

Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky?

--
Nom=de=Plume


I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'.




Don't try to *think* - that's your problem.


And Rob is an _expert_ when it comes to trying to think and having problems
doing so! (some lovin for ya for Xmas)


Nice!

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

nom=de=plume wrote:

It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim.


"Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the
dock and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half
a decade but came running to his side for no particular reason?

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim.


"Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock
and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a
decade but came running to his side for no particular reason?




Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his
posts whenever possible.

--
Nom=de=Plume

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

On Dec 21, 7:58*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

...

nom=de=plume wrote:

It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim.

"Bad Jim"? *Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock
and how they are determined? *Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a
decade but came running to his side for no particular reason?

Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his
posts whenever possible.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't
resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his
posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well?

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 21, 7:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

...

nom=de=plume wrote:

It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim.

"Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the
dock
and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a
decade but came running to his side for no particular reason?

Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his
posts whenever possible.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't
resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his
posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well?


"I ignore his posts whenever possible."

English translation:

"I ignore his posts whenever possible."

--
Nom=de=Plume

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

On Dec 21, 9:37*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 21, 7:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Rob" wrote in message

m...

nom=de=plume wrote:

It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim.

"Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the
dock
and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a
decade but came running to his side for no particular reason?

Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his
posts whenever possible.

--
Nom=de=Plume
I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't
resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his
posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well?

"I ignore his posts whenever possible."

English translation:

"I ignore his posts whenever possible."

--
Nom=de=Plume

So, you are saying that it is never possible and you can't! Well, why
didn't you say so to begin with?

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 21, 9:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 21, 7:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Rob" wrote in message

m...

nom=de=plume wrote:

It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim.

"Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the
dock
and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a
decade but came running to his side for no particular reason?

Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his
posts whenever possible.

--
Nom=de=Plume
I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't
resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his
posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well?

"I ignore his posts whenever possible."

English translation:

"I ignore his posts whenever possible."

--
Nom=de=Plume

So, you are saying that it is never possible and you can't! Well, why
didn't you say so to begin with?


??
--
Nom=de=Plume