This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

In article 308fb8d2-553b-4e45-97aa-
,
says...

On Dec 18, 5:52*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article m,
says...







"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
And to think many on the right believe every word he utters....

Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made a
statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the
climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that
global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed to
be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of AccuWeather
on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a manner
that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked by
Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this record
cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather
guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything
like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that
global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting
that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming. We
just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that was
from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject of
course.

One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to stick
together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line.

As does the left... so what. Folks who believe in American Values stick
together, what's your point?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, yes, only the right wants whats good for the citizens and the
country. The left want to kill babies and hate the country. Same old
song and dance. (Aerosmith!)

Yup, I knew yesterday when I wrote this, you would jump in with both
feet and not read it. I never said "caring about the country was
exclusive to one party or the other". In fact if you read carefully I
suggested two groups of folks who care. Your defensiveness blinds you to
open mindedness all the time, you should calm down and read a bit more
carefully.

Either way, as I have noted before. Your biggest problem is always
assuming you are right and everyone who has an opposing point of view is
either lying, or wrong... It shows up all the time in your writing, It's
really frustrating to be dismissed for having a different point of
view...

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

In article m,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:54:01 -0500, "mmc" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"mmc" wrote in message
g.com...

"Steve B" wrote in message
...

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...



And to think many on the right believe every word he utters....

Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He made
a
statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the
climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect that
global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was supposed
to
be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of
AccuWeather
on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a
manner
that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was asked
by
Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this
record
cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The weather
guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean anything
like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that
global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so
he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man
has
NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data suggesting
that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on warming.
We
just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but that
was
from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the subject
of
course.

One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability to
stick
together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line.

Copenhagen, not Geneva.

reply:

Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation.

Geneva. That's rich.

Steve

Details and facts don't matter to those on either far end of the
political stick.
Ron Paul 2012.



Ron Paul is absolutely at the far end of the political stick. He's an
ultra-libertarian, and he's irrational about what is right or even
possible politically. He's a joke.


--
Nom=de=Plume

The joke part is that he dosen't stand a chance as long as there are
bought
and paid for Republicans AND Democrats driving this screwed up train. Paul
is far less a joke than many of the elected celebrities from the big 2.
Why are both sides so afraid of a third party? The closest we're allowed
to
have is Ralph Nader, who corporate America buries by pumping huge $$$ into
the Rep/Dem beauty contests.
I guess it's better sharing almost every elected office in this country
with
one other group instead of two.
Neither you nor the Reps want to see mainstream America calm and working
together. Like the cable news programs upon which you suckle, MSNBC and
FOX,
you'd rather see people divided than a strong group in the middle -
otherwise your collective BS would dry up and blow away.

i can report that your last statement is complete bull****.

I know, you must be right and they must be wrong!
Afraid of the competition? I like Paul because he's a real conservative, not
what passes for conservative nowadays.

"Please sir, give me some more?"

Actually, if the Dem leaders are going to play against the Reps they should
eat more red meat. As rare as possible. Reid and Pelosi are the definition
of wimps. Some have the testicular fortitude to stand up, like Grayson, but
not the top dogs.

Yeah, he really does call names better than most doesn't he? Is that
your number one concern in a pol?

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Depends on what's most important, job security or integrity.
Fox doesn't take kindly to those who disagree with the memo.
Accu-Weather can be replaced.
Plenty of other weather outfits.

--Vic

Yeah, when I want both sides of an issue I don't turn of FOX where there
are always representatives from both sides, I turn on MSNBC or NPR and
hear both sides from one point of view... That's funny Vic... So answer
the question Saran didn't, where do you get your news?

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

In article 6ca2a66c-7f16-442e-9346-
, says...

On Dec 18, 8:42*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"but does this mean that man is causing global warming?"

Didn't we just go through this a while back with the ozone layer?

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

THE SKY IS FALLING!

I can and do believe that there was some causality the ozone layer. *But
this thing about carbon dioxide is just a way to transfer wealth under the
guise of doing good. *Nothing is going to change. *We're just going to give
some poor countries money we don't have so they can have token pollution
control. *It's that simple.

Steve

And we will have higher taxes and more government agencies to handle
the transfer. There really are black helicopters out there.

Yeah, and they are carrying bags of cash..

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

In article be021516-08ac-4540-a4c5-8d81e741ab89
@n31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 18, 7:02*pm, John H wrote:

And we will have higher taxes and more government agencies to handle
the transfer. There really are black helicopters out there.


Oh, man! You got that right, John!

i see 'em all the time!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSlutmu-xiI

Most likely DEA agents getting ready to descend upon a marijuana crop.

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

On Dec 19, 9:20*am, BAR wrote:
In article be021516-08ac-4540-a4c5-8d81e741ab89
@n31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com, says...



On Dec 18, 7:02*pm, John H wrote:

And we will have higher taxes and more government agencies to handle
the transfer. There really are black helicopters out there.

Oh, man! *You got that right, John!

i see 'em all the time!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSlutmu-xiI

Most likely DEA agents getting ready to descend upon a marijuana crop.

Well BAR, I'm not discounting your idea, but you know that an olive
drab Huey at 1000 ft will always look black.

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:09:16 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Depends on what's most important, job security or integrity.
Fox doesn't take kindly to those who disagree with the memo.
Accu-Weather can be replaced.
Plenty of other weather outfits.

--Vic

Yeah, when I want both sides of an issue I don't turn of FOX where there
are always representatives from both sides, I turn on MSNBC or NPR and
hear both sides from one point of view... That's funny Vic... So answer
the question Saran didn't, where do you get your news?

Mostly cable TV. Fox, C-Span, CNN, MSNBC.
But I also read actual legislation and random political commentary on
the internet.
I leave the scientific stuff to the scientists.
They'll work it out.
You saying Fox is neutral on the global warming stuff?
I don't get that impression. The memo has been distributed.
Talking heads reading what they're told to read from the prompter.
Lots of blondes. Real climate scientists right there. Oh yeah.
And nobody here strikes me as a ****ing climate scientist either.
I don't care what side they take.
Bet some are lucky enough to keep their boats afloat.
Some real good cut-and-pasters though.
Sorry. That's how I see it. No offense.
But I won't go so far as to act like those Senators do to people they
despise, and say "My dear friend and colleague."
Hehe. You know what I mean.

--Vic

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 5:13 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:52:58 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
No. There was no message.

LOL!! Dude - the Hannity screed was one huge blast against a
messenger.

No. Not at all. It was an actual dialogue between Hannity and the
Accuweather founder.

Look, you're on the wrong side of this issue - you know it, you just
don't want to accept it.

The "science" isn't "settled" because it's based on a fraudulent
premise with amateur data mining done by amateur programmers to fit an
agenda that created a job worth millions. Your guys have been proven
wrong on so many climate issues that it should be embarrassing.

And please don't do your usual prove a negative schtick - it's really
old.

Every time someone here shows you actual data that shows FOR A FACT
the direct correlation between CO2 levels and warming trends you sweep
it under the carpet, saying that the only "honest science" is that the
fits your right wing agenda.


Facts... those pesky things... darn them anyway!

--
Nom=de=Plume

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article m,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:54:01 -0500, "mmc" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"mmc" wrote in message
g.com...

"Steve B" wrote in message
...

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 10:09 am, "mmc" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...



And to think many on the right believe every word he utters....

Last evening on my drive home, I was listening to Hannity. He
made
a
statement about the weather in Geneva where they are having the
climate talks. Well, this idiot said something to the affect
that
global warming is a hoax because the weather in Geneva was
supposed
to
be a record cold! THEN he had the guy that is the head of
AccuWeather
on. Now if you listen to Hannity, he'll ask questions in such a
manner
that it will help in HIS discussion. Well the weather guy was
asked
by
Hannity something like well, if the weather in Geneva is this
record
cold, doesn't this disspell the global warming debate? The
weather
guy, who is Hannity's friend replied, "no, it doesn't mean
anything
like that. As a matter of fact, there is very real evidence that
global warming IS real." Now, Hannity didn't like this answer,
so
he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?"
The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that
man
has
NOT caused global warming. Again, there is a LOT of data
suggesting
that man's pollutants and co2 levels have had an affect on
warming.
We
just don't know how much." These may not be exact quotes, but
that
was
from the horses mouth! So what did Hannity do? Changed the
subject
of
course.

One thing the hard right has to be applauded for is thier ability
to
stick
together no matter what. And to blindly follow the party line.

Copenhagen, not Geneva.

reply:

Typical lib not to even know the major details of the conversation.

Geneva. That's rich.

Steve

Details and facts don't matter to those on either far end of the
political stick.
Ron Paul 2012.



Ron Paul is absolutely at the far end of the political stick. He's an
ultra-libertarian, and he's irrational about what is right or even
possible politically. He's a joke.


--
Nom=de=Plume

The joke part is that he dosen't stand a chance as long as there are
bought
and paid for Republicans AND Democrats driving this screwed up train.
Paul
is far less a joke than many of the elected celebrities from the big 2.
Why are both sides so afraid of a third party? The closest we're
allowed
to
have is Ralph Nader, who corporate America buries by pumping huge $$$
into
the Rep/Dem beauty contests.
I guess it's better sharing almost every elected office in this country
with
one other group instead of two.
Neither you nor the Reps want to see mainstream America calm and
working
together. Like the cable news programs upon which you suckle, MSNBC and
FOX,
you'd rather see people divided than a strong group in the middle -
otherwise your collective BS would dry up and blow away.

i can report that your last statement is complete bull****.

I know, you must be right and they must be wrong!
Afraid of the competition? I like Paul because he's a real conservative,
not
what passes for conservative nowadays.

"Please sir, give me some more?"

Actually, if the Dem leaders are going to play against the Reps they
should
eat more red meat. As rare as possible. Reid and Pelosi are the
definition
of wimps. Some have the testicular fortitude to stand up, like Grayson,
but
not the top dogs.

Yeah, he really does call names better than most doesn't he? Is that
your number one concern in a pol?


He is a bit naive and honest. That's a good start.


--
Nom=de=Plume

This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
 

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:46:10 -0800, jps wrote:


You'll wait for honest data while realists watch the polar caps melt.

See, that, in itself, is the political talking point. Nobody that has
crap for brains denies that is happening. The "WHY" is what is
important. Good science will tell us whether man is contributing 99%
or 1% to the temperature rise. Neither Hannity nor Gore are going to
give you good science, but if you are having an acute attack of
cognitive dissonance they probably have a temporary cure for that.
--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
-Thomas Sowell

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186


You certainly won't get good science from Hannity. He's not interested in
science. He's interested in fear-mongering.

Gore has the facts available, since he actually listens to scientists.

--
Nom=de=Plume