Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:52:14 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote: Studies show not much change in crashes from a 0.1 to a 0.08 level. I am for penalties, but making it a mandatory felony is as stupid as a you get. And the hardcore drunks drive better at a 0.1 than they do at a 0.0. The body, I think, suppresses a lot of chemical production that the alcohol provides. Those alcoholics that I have known need a drink to get going in the morning. When you can drink a pint and show little effect, you have a problem Well, you say that, but it's not true. You may not show the effects, but they are there. And I know - believe me, I know. You're talking to somebody who once drank a bottle of Aqua Velva to get rid of the shakes enough to drive to the convience store to get a bottle of Boone's Farm to be able to get to the package store for a case of beer and a quart of Valu-Rite bourbon. :) It was shortly after that that I understood that I had a problem - so to speak. :) And I'm sorry, but it's just not true that a drunk can drive better at ..1 than .0 - they may not show the effects as readily, but they are blitzed. Very few people metabolize alcohol efficiently enough to avoid the effects - something like 1 out of every 15 million or so I'm given to believe. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Please, for the sake of the country, keep Obama safe | General | |||
To Our Children's Children's Children, On the Threshold of aNightmare | General | |||
Go Vote for the sake of pinks everywhere | General | |||
SAILING for @%^&^&**&^ sake | ASA | |||
Agreement in Maine Will Remove Dams for Salmon's Sake | General |