"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:27:21 -0600, Richard Casady
wrote:

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:58:43 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

Why do you s'pose they didn't just make it a felony to drive with any
passenger in the car?

Many bad ideas are sold as ' for the children '

Casady

I agree with Tim. The children not in the car deserve protection also.
--

John H

Guy blows 0.08 and a kid in the car. He goes to jail for more than a
year, felony, and the kid ends up in foster care, or the mom and kid end
up sleeping in a shelter. Just like a lot of other mandatory sentencing
laws. unintended consequenses rule.



So, by your philosophy we should not try to do the right thing. That's a
pretty low standard.

--
Nom=de=Plume




Huh? Where is a mandatory felony for a 0.08 BAC the right thing? Other
studies have shown no difference in .08 and .1 BAC safety results. How
about if the guy is endangering the child, he gets arrested for that. Not
because he was driving safely and got pulled over for a bad brake light,
and the cop does a BAC on him. So you have 2 drinks and get pulled over
with your neice in the car. You go to jail for at least a year.
Definition of a felony, is the jail sentence is longer than a year. You
going to get your life together when you get out? No home, no business,
and a record.

Not sure what you're ranting about. You said there were unintended
consequences. That's true for many things. It's pretty difficult to devine
what they'll be in all situations.

--
Nom=de=Plume