Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 86
Default For the children's sake...


"Tim" wrote in message
...
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss


NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive
DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board.

That ought to help save lives!


Not sure if that last sentence is a statement or a snide comment.

Drunks don't care about anything, even passengers.

And if more laws reduced deaths and DUIs, we would have evidence of this
already, as we have increased the laws.

There is not correlation between increasing laws and people lessening their
criminal acts. Look at Prohibition.

Steve


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default For the children's sake...

"Steve B" wrote in message
...

"Tim" wrote in message
...
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...y.aspx?ref=rss


NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive
DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board.

That ought to help save lives!


Not sure if that last sentence is a statement or a snide comment.

Drunks don't care about anything, even passengers.

And if more laws reduced deaths and DUIs, we would have evidence of this
already, as we have increased the laws.

There is not correlation between increasing laws and people lessening
their criminal acts. Look at Prohibition.

Steve



I'm not sure what you mean by "lessening their criminal acts." If you mean
that laws don't reduce criminal activity, then that's true for some laws,
e.g., death penalty laws don't reduce homicides. But, I suspect it's not
true for others, and laws do prevent bad outcomes, e.g., seat belt laws.

I don't have access to the full article, but here's the abstract.

"This article reexamines the effectiveness of blood alcohol content (BAC)
laws in reducing traffic fatalities. Differences-in-differences estimators
of U.S. state-level data with standard errors corrected for autocorrelation
show no evidence that lowering the BAC limits to 0.08 g/dL reduced fatality
rates, either in total or in crashes likely to be alcohol related, or in
states that passed BAC 08 in laws either in advance of or in response to
federal pressure. Other legislations, including administrative license
revocation and primary seat belt laws, are found effective in reducing
fatalities in all specifications. Endogeneity tests using event analyses
confirm the differences-in-differences estimates."

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default For the children's sake...

On Dec 9, 6:43*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...wi-bill-compou...


NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive
DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board.


That ought to help save lives!


Not sure if that last sentence is a statement or a snide comment.


a snide comment.

Drunks don't care about anything, even passengers.

And if more laws reduced deaths and DUIs, we would have evidence of this
already, as we have increased the laws.

There is not correlation between increasing laws and people lessening their
criminal acts. *Look at Prohibition.

Steve


And above the basics, it applies to gun laws too.

  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 86
Default For the children's sake...


"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Dec 9, 6:43 pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...wi-bill-compou...


NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive
DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board.


That ought to help save lives!


Not sure if that last sentence is a statement or a snide comment.


a snide comment.

Drunks don't care about anything, even passengers.

And if more laws reduced deaths and DUIs, we would have evidence of this
already, as we have increased the laws.

There is not correlation between increasing laws and people lessening
their
criminal acts. Look at Prohibition.

Steve


And above the basics, it applies to gun laws too.


reply: Well, if there are more laws, it means the government needs to hire
more law enforcement officers. Is that what they're talking about with all
this jobs creation stuff?

The old laws worked so good, lets make some more! Yeah, that oughta do it.

Steve


  #5   Report Post  
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1
Default

The children should not be allowed for the child labor below 15 years.It will hamper their education and increase the mental stress.There are number of laws are there for preventing the child labor,but it is not becoming functional because the public is not aware of it.So we have to be aware of the child labor and stop it right there .


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default For the children's sake...

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Dec 9, 6:43 pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...wi-bill-compou...


NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive
DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board.


That ought to help save lives!


Not sure if that last sentence is a statement or a snide comment.


a snide comment.

Drunks don't care about anything, even passengers.

And if more laws reduced deaths and DUIs, we would have evidence of this
already, as we have increased the laws.

There is not correlation between increasing laws and people lessening
their
criminal acts. Look at Prohibition.

Steve

And above the basics, it applies to gun laws too.



The Brady Bill was implemented in February of 1994. In 1997, the number of
violent crimes committed with firearms had fallen 25% since 1994, while the
overall number of violent crimes had declined 14%.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 320
Default For the children's sake...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Dec 9, 6:43 pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11...wi-bill-compou...
NY just passed a new law to protect kids. Now it is a felon, to drive
DWI/DUI with children 15 years of age or less on board.
That ought to help save lives!

Not sure if that last sentence is a statement or a snide comment.


a snide comment.

Drunks don't care about anything, even passengers.

And if more laws reduced deaths and DUIs, we would have evidence of this
already, as we have increased the laws.

There is not correlation between increasing laws and people lessening
their
criminal acts. Look at Prohibition.

Steve

And above the basics, it applies to gun laws too.



The Brady Bill was implemented in February of 1994. In 1997, the number of
violent crimes committed with firearms had fallen 25% since 1994, while the
overall number of violent crimes had declined 14%.


Not enough credit is given to the peacemaker, as a tool to keep crime down.


-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_Peacemaker


Imagine being such a worthless p.o.s. that you post on usenet using
someone else's ID
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please, for the sake of the country, keep Obama safe Lu Powell[_8_] General 6 September 4th 09 09:03 PM
To Our Children's Children's Children, On the Threshold of aNightmare Frogwatch[_2_] General 63 February 1st 09 06:07 AM
Go Vote for the sake of pinks everywhere §ñühwØ£f General 0 September 23rd 08 04:30 PM
SAILING for @%^&^&**&^ sake [email protected] ASA 9 May 3rd 07 01:27 PM
Agreement in Maine Will Remove Dams for Salmon's Sake Phat Ratty Ratt General 0 October 8th 03 11:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017