Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Jim Jim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 99
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance

NowNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
D.Duck wrote:
Jim wrote:
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet
The study's authors warn that the health care
legislation "would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and
would "leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when
reform kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.
Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?
...in response to a specious argument, btw.
And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical
when I joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did
not promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take
care of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent
Orange vet, and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.
I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.
I think it depends on what you did in the military. I
bounced around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars,
CIB, a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a
POW. He
deserved the care he got.
And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line,
it matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for
years and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma,
the ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?
They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later
so they
covered those exposed.
After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took
decades from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?
Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is
covered also because of his coverage. But she did spend a
couple years in the Army.
By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that
health care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting
killed, and working in the chemical. Your point?
The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a
worse job than local government in education.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume

Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"

Thought you were a beer conasewer

Commonsewer?

Thank you Mr Duck. I don't mind being corrected when I make a Typo. I
expected Donnie would pick up on it but his mind seems to be occupied
with other things.


His daddy/lover Harry didn't tell him to yet.

I almost forgot about those ties that bind.
  #62   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,995
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance


"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet
The study's authors warn that the health care
legislation "would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and
would "leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when reform
kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.
Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?
...in response to a specious argument, btw.
And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when
I joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take
care of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange
vet, and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.
I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.
I think it depends on what you did in the military. I bounced
around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars,
CIB, a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a
POW. He
deserved the care he got.
And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for
years and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?
They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later
so they
covered those exposed.
After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took
decades from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?
Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is covered
also because of his coverage. But she did spend a couple years
in the Army.
By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that health
care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting killed,
and working in the chemical. Your point?
The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse
job than local government in education.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume

Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"
Thought you were a beer conasewer


Not really....... i usually stick to what I like...Labatt Blue, Keiths
Light.... or Keiths Draught beer on tap

So why the interest in grapes?


That's for Kalif Swills benefit.


  #63   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,995
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance


"Jim" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
Jim wrote:
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet
The study's authors warn that the health care
legislation "would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and
would "leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when reform
kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.
Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?
...in response to a specious argument, btw.
And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when
I joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take
care of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange
vet, and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.
I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.

I think it depends on what you did in the military. I bounced
around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars,
CIB, a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a
POW. He
deserved the care he got.
And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for
years and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?
They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later
so they
covered those exposed.
After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took
decades from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?
Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is covered
also because of his coverage. But she did spend a couple years
in the Army.
By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that health
care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting killed,
and working in the chemical. Your point?
The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse
job than local government in education.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume


Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"

Thought you were a beer conasewer



Commonsewer?


Thank you Mr Duck. I don't mind being corrected when I make a Typo. I
expected Donnie would pick up on it but his mind seems to be occupied with
other things.



I didn't want to embarrass you any more than I have to.


  #64   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance


"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:7srkf51rto8j58f353l2ca6iqstitt7a6p@4 ax.com...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:sdfkf55phedo8f92i0ep84ukfgu575mc ...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet

The study's authors warn that the health care legislation
"would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and would
"leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when reform
kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.

Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?

...in response to a specious argument, btw.

And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when I
joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take care
of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange vet,
and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.

I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.


I think it depends on what you did in the military. I bounced
around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars, CIB,
a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a POW.
He
deserved the care he got.

And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for years
and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?

They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later so
they
covered those exposed.

After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took decades
from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?

Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is covered
also because of his coverage. But she did spend a couple years in
the Army.

By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that health
care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting killed, and
working in the chemical. Your point?

The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse job
than local government in education.


I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume


Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"


You can not afford California wine.


  #65   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance


"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet
The study's authors warn that the health care
legislation "would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and
would "leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when
reform kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.
Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?
...in response to a specious argument, btw.
And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when
I joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take
care of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange
vet, and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.
I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.
I think it depends on what you did in the military. I
bounced around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of
the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars,
CIB, a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a
POW. He
deserved the care he got.
And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for
years and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?
They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later
so they
covered those exposed.
After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took
decades from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?
Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is
covered also because of his coverage. But she did spend a
couple years in the Army.
By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that
health care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting
killed, and working in the chemical. Your point?
The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse
job than local government in education.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume

Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"
Thought you were a beer conasewer

Not really....... i usually stick to what I like...Labatt Blue, Keiths
Light.... or Keiths Draught beer on tap

So why the interest in grapes?


That's for Kalif Swills benefit.


I rarely drink, unlike you. But I hope the grapes do well. Have a couple
friends that own vineyards. Very upscale wine, and one of them, his son has
a thriving vineyard management company. Want them to stay successful.




  #66   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance


"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
Jim wrote:
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet
The study's authors warn that the health care
legislation "would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and
would "leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when
reform kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.
Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?
...in response to a specious argument, btw.
And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when
I joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take
care of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange
vet, and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.
I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.

I think it depends on what you did in the military. I
bounced around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of
the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars,
CIB, a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a
POW. He
deserved the care he got.
And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for
years and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?
They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later
so they
covered those exposed.
After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took
decades from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?
Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is
covered also because of his coverage. But she did spend a
couple years in the Army.
By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that
health care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting
killed, and working in the chemical. Your point?
The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse
job than local government in education.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume


Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"

Thought you were a beer conasewer


Commonsewer?


Thank you Mr Duck. I don't mind being corrected when I make a Typo. I
expected Donnie would pick up on it but his mind seems to be occupied
with other things.



I didn't want to embarrass you any more than I have to.


Bwahaaaaahaaaaa


  #67   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 146
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance

In article ,
says...

NowNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
D.Duck wrote:
Jim wrote:
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet
The study's authors warn that the health care
legislation "would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and
would "leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when
reform kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.
Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?
...in response to a specious argument, btw.
And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical
when I joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did
not promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take
care of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent
Orange vet, and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.
I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.
I think it depends on what you did in the military. I
bounced around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars,
CIB, a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a
POW. He
deserved the care he got.
And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line,
it matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for
years and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma,
the ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?
They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later
so they
covered those exposed.
After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took
decades from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?
Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is
covered also because of his coverage. But she did spend a
couple years in the Army.
By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that
health care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting
killed, and working in the chemical. Your point?
The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a
worse job than local government in education.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume

Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"

Thought you were a beer conasewer

Commonsewer?
Thank you Mr Duck. I don't mind being corrected when I make a Typo. I
expected Donnie would pick up on it but his mind seems to be occupied
with other things.


His daddy/lover Harry didn't tell him to yet.

I almost forgot about those ties that bind.


They're both quite easy TO forget!

--
WAFA the newsgroup liar free!
  #68   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 146
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance

In article ,
says...

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:7srkf51rto8j58f353l2ca6iqstitt7a6p@4 ax.com...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:sdfkf55phedo8f92i0ep84ukfgu575mc ...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet

The study's authors warn that the health care legislation
"would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and would
"leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when reform
kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.

Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?

...in response to a specious argument, btw.

And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when I
joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take care
of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange vet,
and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.

I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.


I think it depends on what you did in the military. I bounced
around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars, CIB,
a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a POW.
He
deserved the care he got.

And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for years
and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?

They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later so
they
covered those exposed.

After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took decades
from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?

Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is covered
also because of his coverage. But she did spend a couple years in
the Army.

By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that health
care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting killed, and
working in the chemical. Your point?

The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse job
than local government in education.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume


Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"


You can not afford California wine.


That's because he's buying his son's beer, paying for his car and
insurance.

--
WAFA the newsgroup liar free!
  #69   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:7srkf51rto8j58f353l2ca6iqstitt7a6p@4 ax.com...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:sdfkf55phedo8f92i0ep84ukfgu575mc ...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet

The study's authors warn that the health care legislation
"would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and would
"leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when reform
kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.

Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?

...in response to a specious argument, btw.

And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when I
joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take care
of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange vet,
and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.

I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.


I think it depends on what you did in the military. I bounced
around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars, CIB,
a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a POW.
He
deserved the care he got.

And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for years
and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?

They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later so
they
covered those exposed.

After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took decades
from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?

Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is covered
also because of his coverage. But she did spend a couple years in
the Army.

By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that health
care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting killed, and
working in the chemical. Your point?

The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse job
than local government in education.


I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume


Challenged what little brain power you have? The feds screw up a lot of
stuff they control. Ever since the Dept of Education was formed, our
education results have plummeted.


Ah English. Nice that you can form the sentences. I'm sure it was just a
string of typos.

Keep up the personal attacks Bill. They make you look like such a great
person.

Education is a complicated subject. Certainly, local control has its points,
but there's a double-edge sword for that methodology alone also. Locally
controlled schools can be great, but they can also be terrible. Home
schooling, for example, is typically very, very good... equal to or better
than regular schooling, but they're not always great. Some regulation re the
curriculum is needed to prevent problems (home schooling and locally
controlled schools). Standards are important. Teaching to a test is
terrible. You can't blame the quality of public education on any one side.
No Child Left Behind was a good idea, supported by Reps and Dems., but it
was under-funded. It hasn't failed completely from what I've read, but it's
not doing what it should do either.

FYI, I've enjoyed discussing various things with you, but I have to tell you
that that will stop if you continue with your belittling.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #70   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,995
Default 6 Vets die each day for lack of health insurance


"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:43 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:7srkf51rto8j58f353l2ca6iqstitt7a6p@ 4ax.com...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:55:35 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:36:21 -0800, jps
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:51 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:sdfkf55phedo8f92i0ep84ukfgu575m ...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:41 -0600,

wrote:

genuine drivel redacted by some dead poet

The study's authors warn that the health care legislation
"would do
virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and would
"leave at
least 17 million uninsured over the long run when reform
kicks in,"
leaving many veterans still without care.

Why not simply adjust the means-testing favorably for
veterans (ref.
"Spinal Tap")?

...in response to a specious argument, btw.

And I do not remember being promised lifetime medical when I
joined the
Air
Force. They cover service connected injuries, but did not
promise
medical
for those not retiring from the service And they do take care
of those
with
service connected problems. My brother is an Agent Orange
vet, and gets
his
care via the VA. Good care also.

I think vets deserve better. I'm sure you disagree.


I think it depends on what you did in the military. I bounced
around
in the North Atlantic, kept the godless communists out of the
Chesapeake bay and I don't think the VA owes me anything.

My father had a European theater medal with 2 battle stars, CIB,
a
couple other campaign medals, 2 purple hearts and he was a POW.
He
deserved the care he got.

And yet, unless you were injured somewhere along the line, it
matters
not what you faced.

What happens, like in the case of Agent Orange and a hundred
other
chemicals vets were exposed to, symptoms don't show up for years
and
aren't directly attributable to the exposure, the trauma, the
ugliness
that is war.

Are those vets any less entitled?

They get taken care of. Agent Orange effects showed up later so
they
covered those exposed.

After a long fight over recognizing the effects. It took decades
from
what I recall.

Excellent coverage, eh?

Yup, my brother gets excellent coverage. And his wife is covered
also because of his coverage. But she did spend a couple years in
the Army.

By gov't run health care?? I'm shocked.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Gov't run does not mean cheaper. And he paid a lot for that health
care. Sleeping in a tent, getting shot at, friends getting killed,
and working in the chemical. Your point?

The gov't does somethings quite well!

--
Nom=de=Plume


Over spend money for one. And the Fed's do a well at doing a worse
job than local government in education.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. I need it in
something resembling English... no offense intended. Could you try
again....

--
Nom=de=Plume


Mr Swill is living up to his name again.
"I'M PRAYING FOR A RAIN IN CALIFORNIA
SO THE GRAPES CAN GROW AND THEY CAN MAKE MORE WINE"


You can not afford California wine.

Guess I'll have to settle for the old Dean Martin record.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzeR1pJIZBA


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
health insurance companies at work... H the K[_2_] General 5 September 18th 09 06:05 PM
Canadian Cruisers & Health Insurance? Glenn \(s/v Seawing\) Cruising 2 September 26th 07 03:42 PM
Health insurance, again Skip Gundlach Cruising 11 May 5th 06 10:43 PM
insurance or lack of Stu Cruising 4 June 18th 04 04:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017