"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:44:40 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:55:57 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:njfff59qq8ngiskkbtv3qja8df9lv7c9e3@4 ax.com...
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:07:50 -0700, Canuck57

wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Tonight at 11:15 pm EST, by a 220 to 215 vote, the House
passed
their
version of Health Care Reform.

Among the most meaningful pieces of legislation in history
making
it
through one body of congress is a big deal. There's lots of
work
left
but I'm damned happy a major bridge has been crossed.

All you folks who hate your fellow Americans and don't think
it's
worth the investment have my sympathy.


One lone Republican voted for it. 39 Democrats opposed. That
****es me
off.
Well, it's on to the Senate. I'm sure they'll do something by
2015.

Lets hope they bog it down and 2010 becomes an election issue on
the
very point. A decision this big needs direct voting on the
issue.
Hell, if the majority wants government to nationalize health
care,
so be
it. But I suspect when people take the time to read, this is a
hidden
tax grab. Get the cash flow to the government and then turn down
survice levels while they skim the moneys.

The polls are very clear in that Americans want health care
reform.

Haley Barbour was on Meet the Press today insisting the majority
of
Americans don't want health care reform. I don't know of a
single
poll, apart from heavy Republican districts, who are against
health
care reform.

Lying straight faced is Republican strong suit.

Yes, the people are for health care reform. Or really cheaper
healthcare.
But do they want the government telling them what services they can
have?

Oy. Doesn't that happen right now? What makes you think the
government is going to deny any more procedures or care than the
profit making health care business?

The government has never run anything cheaper than private
industry.

Oh boy, here we go. Isn't most medicare administration done by
private industry?

And
ramming through a "healthcare reform" bill in a short time in the
back
room
and then voting on it less than 3 days later, leads to those ****ED
UP
laws
that the unintended consequences are worse than the cure. The Feds
should
be working on creating sustainable jobs, cutting spending and
curing a
depression first.

Don't you think keeping people solvent who might otherwise be
swamped
by medical costs is a good investment?

Perhaps it's not the first consideration in getting us back on our
economic feet but it's up there.

Did President Bush focus only on invading Iraq or was he also
working
on making the Chinese-funded tax cuts for US rich permanent?

jps, you seem to be a one trick pony. Everything is fubar because
Bush
invaded the Middle East. Ain't so, and until you can come up with
resonable debates: kiss my ass!

I find it difficult to find one thing that Bush did with actual
compassionate results. Perhaps the Africa AIDS program, but even that
was messed up.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I stated that jps believes all the crap is Bush's fault. Everything
was
perfect before Bush 2. Except We are still spending money in Bosnia,
look what a fine place Clinton left Somalia. Bush was not the one who
signed the bill to let banks be brokerage houses. Something that had
worked well after the 1929 crash. I hope you did better reading on
your
patent searches.

Somalia? That's pretty insignificant in the scheme of things. Bosnia...
we
did a lot of good there. Do you deny that?

It's not all Bush's fault. He just was a significant contributor ...
more
than anyone else.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush just added to the Clusterf*&k. Somalia, killed a lot of our men for
nothing. Bosnia was not our problem, we had no right to interfere. And
Albanians and Serbs have been killing each other for 600 years. Let
Europe
take care of the problem if needed, was their playground. How many
billions
we waste there? And we are still there.

Please tell us how many billions we've wasted in Bosnia.

Then tell us how many billions it takes to make a trillion x 3. Can
you say several orders of magnitude?

A billion hear a billion there, and you are talking real money. How many
billions has Obama overspent in the last 10 months?


Some for sure... can't be helped really. Not nearly as much as Bush wasted
in his administration.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
Some for sure... can't be helped really. Not nearly as much as Bush wasted
in his administration.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Youe opinion. But all Obama's spending has not turned around the recession.
Percentage of unemployment still rising, and that excludes those that have
given up on getting a job. The stock market is mostly a bubble driven by
all the money given to "too big to fail" financial houses. Which have now
decided to give billions of bonus money, even though they have not really
made any money, just a huge infusion of taxpayers $$$$$$$$. We have the
next wave of mortages going to fail. The not subprime ones. The bailout
was to supposed to buy toxic mortgages. None bought, so what did the banks
do with the money. Gold broke $1100. Most of the rise is the falling
dollar. What happens when China wants to cash in all that debt we owe them.

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:15:52 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
Some for sure... can't be helped really. Not nearly as much as Bush wasted
in his administration.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Youe opinion. But all Obama's spending has not turned around the recession.
Percentage of unemployment still rising, and that excludes those that have
given up on getting a job. The stock market is mostly a bubble driven by
all the money given to "too big to fail" financial houses. Which have now
decided to give billions of bonus money, even though they have not really
made any money, just a huge infusion of taxpayers $$$$$$$$. We have the
next wave of mortages going to fail. The not subprime ones. The bailout
was to supposed to buy toxic mortgages. None bought, so what did the banks
do with the money. Gold broke $1100. Most of the rise is the falling
dollar. What happens when China wants to cash in all that debt we owe them.

We're ****ed. Aren't you glad knowing that the 1% got there's before
China cashed in their chips?

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:15:52 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
Some for sure... can't be helped really. Not nearly as much as Bush
wasted
in his administration.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Youe opinion. But all Obama's spending has not turned around the
recession.
Percentage of unemployment still rising, and that excludes those that have
given up on getting a job. The stock market is mostly a bubble driven by
all the money given to "too big to fail" financial houses. Which have now
decided to give billions of bonus money, even though they have not really
made any money, just a huge infusion of taxpayers $$$$$$$$. We have the
next wave of mortages going to fail. The not subprime ones. The bailout
was to supposed to buy toxic mortgages. None bought, so what did the
banks
do with the money. Gold broke $1100. Most of the rise is the falling
dollar. What happens when China wants to cash in all that debt we owe
them.

We're ****ed. Aren't you glad knowing that the 1% got there's before
China cashed in their chips?

Jealous of those who made more than you?

On Nov 11, 12:42*am, jps wrote:


We're ****ed. *Aren't you glad knowing that the 1% got there's before
China cashed in their chips?


What? No chastisment from D'Plume?

"Whooo... now you're swearing.... you really need to get a grip. "

--
Nom=de=Plume "

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Nov 11, 12:42 am, jps wrote:


We're ****ed. Aren't you glad knowing that the 1% got there's before
China cashed in their chips?


What? No chastisment from D'Plume?


Did he say "you're ****ed" or "we're ****ed"?

Is English a second language for you?

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:07:17 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Nov 11, 12:42 am, jps wrote:


We're ****ed. Aren't you glad knowing that the 1% got there's before
China cashed in their chips?


What? No chastisment from D'Plume?


Did he say "you're ****ed" or "we're ****ed"?

Is English a second language for you?

Thinking is certainly foreign to him, why not language too?

On Nov 13, 7:07*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 12:42 am, jps wrote:



We're ****ed. Aren't you glad knowing that the 1% got there's before
China cashed in their chips?
What? No chastisment from D'Plume?

Did he say "you're ****ed" or "we're ****ed"?

Why must you ask? Was remedial reading your major?
I see you have repeated the word[s] you state that you deplore. I
take it you like to re-broadcast foul language?

Is English a second language for you?

Yes, but not really. I was raised speaking French.


--
Nom=de=Plume


De Plume. Beaucoup que vous savez pas.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Nov 13, 7:07 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Nov 11, 12:42 am, jps wrote:



We're ****ed. Aren't you glad knowing that the 1% got there's before
China cashed in their chips?
What? No chastisment from D'Plume?

Did he say "you're ****ed" or "we're ****ed"?

Why must you ask? Was remedial reading your major?
I see you have repeated the word[s] you state that you deplore. I
take it you like to re-broadcast foul language?


OIC. You're just a pill.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
Some for sure... can't be helped really. Not nearly as much as Bush
wasted in his administration.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Youe opinion. But all Obama's spending has not turned around the
recession. Percentage of unemployment still rising, and that excludes
those that have given up on getting a job. The stock market is mostly a
bubble driven by all the money given to "too big to fail" financial
houses. Which have now decided to give billions of bonus money, even
though they have not really made any money, just a huge infusion of
taxpayers $$$$$$$$. We have the next wave of mortages going to fail. The
not subprime ones. The bailout was to supposed to buy toxic mortgages.
None bought, so what did the banks do with the money. Gold broke $1100.
Most of the rise is the falling dollar. What happens when China wants to
cash in all that debt we owe them.

Bush's tax cut for the wealthy is my opinion????

--
Nom=de=Plume