On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:03:22 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:26 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.



Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter
than Republicans.

You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably
sycophantic.

--


That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you
need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons.

You surprise me again, Harry. It is the rare, informed 'progressive'
that will admit to an ascendant aspect to evolution.

Very rare indeed.

Most everything you write qualifies as smarmy.

Are you sure you're not rich? You certainly comport yourself as such.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:52:30 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:03:22 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:26 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.



Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter
than Republicans.

You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably
sycophantic.

--


That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you
need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons.

You surprise me again, Harry. It is the rare, informed 'progressive'
that will admit to an ascendant aspect to evolution.

Very rare indeed.

Most everything you write qualifies as smarmy.

Are you sure you're not rich? You certainly comport yourself as such.

"Content is king," my friend.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:52:30 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:03:22 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:26 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.



Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter
than Republicans.

You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably
sycophantic.

--


That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you
need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons.

You surprise me again, Harry. It is the rare, informed 'progressive'
that will admit to an ascendant aspect to evolution.

Very rare indeed.

Most everything you write qualifies as smarmy.

Are you sure you're not rich? You certainly comport yourself as such.

Was Thales 'rich'?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Stevie" wrote in message
...

Do you ever have an original thought?

-S

Yeah...get your nose out of my butt...you're interfering with my bodily
functions.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:09:52 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:52:30 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:03:22 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:26 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.



Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter
than Republicans.

You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably
sycophantic.

--


That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you
need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons.

You surprise me again, Harry. It is the rare, informed 'progressive'
that will admit to an ascendant aspect to evolution.

Very rare indeed.

Most everything you write qualifies as smarmy.

Are you sure you're not rich? You certainly comport yourself as such.

Was Thales 'rich'?

Are you undergoing rhinoplasty to make yourself look like Bill
Buckley? You don't have his way with words, but you've got the smarmy
part down cold.

Maybe you could be one of those lookalikes they have in Hollywood if
you brushed up on your education.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:32:33 -0500, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:48:23 -0500, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.

I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always
talking about.. pffftttt.

Feral half-bobcat? Sounds like a serious case of 'confabulation.'

Well, I don't have my dictionary handy, and of course I am secure enough
to note that I don't know what "confabulation' means, but if it means
anything like fabrication, you are right on the money After all, it
was our local pedophile, pension theif, fat ass liar who claimed it...

You're close. It has a psychological connotation that describes the
act of filling the gaps in one's memories with false memories. Perhaps
it's one of the symptoms of clinical narcissism. I think, though,
that there may be more than one mental 'aberration' at play. Any
person who receives the word of a feline has 'issues.'

Makes sense. Could it be more replacing horrific memories, such as
severe mental or physical abuse, with fantasy? It seems he must have
suffered some sort of outrageous betrayal but I don't know if it was a
family member, or maybe just the older boys in the neighborhood if you
know what I mean...
--
Wafa free again.

Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:32:33 -0500, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:48:23 -0500, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~
The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.


I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?
Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.
There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.
We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.


Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm
Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.
I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always
talking about.. pffftttt.
Feral half-bobcat? Sounds like a serious case of 'confabulation.'
Well, I don't have my dictionary handy, and of course I am secure enough
to note that I don't know what "confabulation' means, but if it means
anything like fabrication, you are right on the money After all, it
was our local pedophile, pension theif, fat ass liar who claimed it...
You're close. It has a psychological connotation that describes the
act of filling the gaps in one's memories with false memories. Perhaps
it's one of the symptoms of clinical narcissism. I think, though,
that there may be more than one mental 'aberration' at play. Any
person who receives the word of a feline has 'issues.'

Makes sense. Could it be more replacing horrific memories, such as
severe mental or physical abuse, with fantasy? It seems he must have
suffered some sort of outrageous betrayal but I don't know if it was a
family member, or maybe just the older boys in the neighborhood if you
know what I mean...
If you look at the demographics of the area that he grew up in, it
wouldn't be a stretch to say that he got whupped for running his mouth,
on a regular basis.

In article ,
says...

Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:32:33 -0500, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:48:23 -0500, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~
The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.


I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?
Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.
There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.
We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.


Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm
Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.
I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always
talking about.. pffftttt.
Feral half-bobcat? Sounds like a serious case of 'confabulation.'
Well, I don't have my dictionary handy, and of course I am secure enough
to note that I don't know what "confabulation' means, but if it means
anything like fabrication, you are right on the money After all, it
was our local pedophile, pension theif, fat ass liar who claimed it...
You're close. It has a psychological connotation that describes the
act of filling the gaps in one's memories with false memories. Perhaps
it's one of the symptoms of clinical narcissism. I think, though,
that there may be more than one mental 'aberration' at play. Any
person who receives the word of a feline has 'issues.'

Makes sense. Could it be more replacing horrific memories, such as
severe mental or physical abuse, with fantasy? It seems he must have
suffered some sort of outrageous betrayal but I don't know if it was a
family member, or maybe just the older boys in the neighborhood if you
know what I mean...
If you look at the demographics of the area that he grew up in, it
wouldn't be a stretch to say that he got whupped for running his mouth,
on a regular basis.

Naw, I think it was more horrendous than that, but I suppose the daily
beatings could explain it...

--
Wafa free again.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:45:23 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:09:52 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:52:30 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:03:22 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:26 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 4:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:07 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 2:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.



Lower life form? B.S. Cal disdains Republicans. That makes him smarter
than Republicans.

You're not only a PR person for your, cat, Harry - you're immitigably
sycophantic.

--


That's many steps up the evolutionary ladder from "conservative." If you
need evidence, you'll find it here, among the right-wing morons.

You surprise me again, Harry. It is the rare, informed 'progressive'
that will admit to an ascendant aspect to evolution.

Very rare indeed.

Most everything you write qualifies as smarmy.

Are you sure you're not rich? You certainly comport yourself as such.

Was Thales 'rich'?

Are you undergoing rhinoplasty to make yourself look like Bill
Buckley? You don't have his way with words, but you've got the smarmy
part down cold.

Maybe you could be one of those lookalikes they have in Hollywood if
you brushed up on your education.

Aren't familiar with Thales I presume? (Keywords that might work for
you: olive presses, Miletus, pre-socratics, star gazing...)

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...

Do you ever have an original thought?

-S

Yeah...get your nose out of my butt...you're interfering with my bodily
functions.



Are you twelve, Don?

-S