On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:49:21 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:02 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national
level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.



All politics is local. That's the trend. 60% of the voters in Virginia and
NJ said Obama didn't influence their vote. 20% said he did in a positive
way; 20% said he did in a negative way.


That's especially true in Virginia. The Dems in that state have two
really large, strong pockets of strength, and a third, smaller area. The
big areas are northern Virginia and the Richmond area. So, who do they
pick in their primary? A guy almost no one has heard of, from the
backwater part of the state where the rednecks live. From that moment
on, the election results were a known conclusion. Creigh Deeds might
have been an ideal candidate for the 1970s, but not for 2008.

The House pickup in upstate New York was a kick to Sarah Palin's
gonads...:) A delightful surprise, as it were.

It's a testament to their stupidity. Circular firing squad.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Small spoiled dogs have become our noise substitute for the kids. Still
get up in the middle of the night to let them out but at least there are
no diapers.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:28:05 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.

Why am I not suprised that you would find Faux News unworthy of a good
slagging? George Wallace and Strom Thurmond both outgrew their odd
dependency.

In article ,
says...

Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~
The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?


Oh, for God's sake! This has turned to complete idiotic lunacy.....

You think it's lunacy to wish the president would listen to the
taxpayers? Why?

--
Wafa free again.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.

Yeah right, it's only because they ask questions, face it... Last week
Obama said one day that the 3.1 uptick in the economy was solely because
of the stimulous package. The day before, Gibbs had said that half, or
1.6 % was caused by the cash for clunkers. A Fox reporter asked Gibbs to
square this, I guess that's the kind of news you are against... Fine..

--
Wafa free again.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:02 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/4/09 1:52 PM, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:08:19 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:43:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:37 -0500, Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:21:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

~~ snerk ~~

The House has gained another Democrat. Of course this is at national level
that has stood from the time of the civil war not to be confused by a
state level that changes hands with the wind. Pfffft! sails luff.



I think the problem is Gibbs who said today, "Obama did not pay
attention, he was watching a special on HBO about his own campaign".
What does this say about Obama? Karl Rove suggested that all presidents
watch these elections and wondered out loud if Obama is lying, or just
saying, "I don't give a **** what you think". The best answer for Gibbs
to have given would have been, "we were watching, and we get the
message", wouldn't you think?

Haven't given it much thought. For a November election there wasn't much
dust kicked up anywhere that was worth noticing. I certainly don't see a
trend yet.

There's a furious circle jerk going on over at Fox News. The tide has
turned -- the circle jerk now features the right hand.

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.

I wonder if that is the picture of his feral half bobcat he is always
talking about.. pffftttt.

--
Wafa free again.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:41:09 -0800, jps wrote:

snipped to the objection of redundancy

We're beyond child bearing years. I hear the talking heads on Fox provide
great entertainment for pre-toddlers. Put them in a jumper and the thirty
second talking heads occupy their time for hours.

That according to grand kids with great grandkids.

That is Fox's Entertainment's value to the western world.



Cal, the smartest cat in my household, snickers at Faux News.

http://tinyurl.com/yam2wrm

Why am I not surprised that you would defer to a lower life form for
validation of your peculiar prejudices? Romulus and Remus both
outgrew their odd dependency.

Why am I not suprised that you would find Faux News unworthy of a good
slagging? George Wallace and Strom Thurmond both outgrew their odd
dependency.

??

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access