nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
...will last until the union or the government figures out a way to
stop it.

" Ford is also running into resistance from its unionized work force
as it tries to cut costs further.

Its improving fortunes were the main reason cited by the United
Automobile Workers on Monday for rejecting another round of labor
concessions that would have roughly matched concessions that workers
at Chrysler and General Motors approved in the spring."

The U.A.W.'s president, Ron Gettelfinger, and its vice president in
charge of the Ford unit, Bob King, said in a statement that the
carmaker's third-quarter profit was "evidence of the contributions
that Ford workers have made.""

http://tinyurl.com/ya4pyay


Why should they cave to demands from management? How about producing decent
products that people want to buy?


My Honda, which was built in the US by American labor, was hit by a
young gal, while on her cell phone, was too busy to look behind her.
It's in the shop for two weeks.

I asked for an American car at Enterprise rent a car. I got a 2010
Chevy Impala. It's a nice car, even though there's a sticky spot on the
dash (poorly mixed epoxy) which never should have made it out of the
factory.

I liked it enough to research some highlights.

It was actually built in Canada. It sells for $28,000 new, but a one
year old one with 20,000 miles can be had at Carmax.com for just about
half. $14,000

My Honda cost $18,200 new, a one year old one can be gotten for $17,000.
A three year old one, with 60,000 is $14,000.

Who, in their right mind would take a hit like 50% in a new car?

Now I understand why GM is in such trouble, who would be dumb enough to
buy a new one?