"NotNow" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:58:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

"And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and
are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if
and when it comes."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/bu...nt/03gore.html

I guess it's easier for a liberal to pretend it's not a scam then to
admit to the possibility that he (or she) may have been wrong.

Just think. This is the *NEW YORK TIMES* publishing this, not the
Washington Times, Harry's favorite paper.


If global warming is nothing but a scam, how come there is SO much
scientific data that it is, indeed occuring?


Because all the scientists who are publishing are getting millions nay
billions of $. They make big oil execs look like pikers. (Let's see who
agrees with this.)

--
Nom=de=Plume

In article ,
says...

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:58:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

"And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and
are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if
and when it comes."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/bu...nt/03gore.html

I guess it's easier for a liberal to pretend it's not a scam then to
admit to the possibility that he (or she) may have been wrong.

Just think. This is the *NEW YORK TIMES* publishing this, not the
Washington Times, Harry's favorite paper.


If global warming is nothing but a scam, how come there is SO much
scientific data that it is, indeed occuring?

If you are not willing to stand up and defend your data and your
conclusions in front of your critics then you aren't too confident in
your data and nobody else should be either.

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:38:53 -0500, NotNow wrote:

I guess it's easier for a liberal to pretend it's not a scam then to
admit to the possibility that he (or she) may have been wrong.

Just think. This is the *NEW YORK TIMES* publishing this, not the
Washington Times, Harry's favorite paper.


If global warming is nothing but a scam, how come there is SO much
scientific data that it is, indeed occuring?


Because nobody is getting grant money to publish a study that doesn't
support the global warming theory.



The oil/coal companies have deep pockets and are certainly funding that
effort.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 11/5/09 1:00 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:38:53 -0500, wrote:

I guess it's easier for a liberal to pretend it's not a scam then to
admit to the possibility that he (or she) may have been wrong.

Just think. This is the *NEW YORK TIMES* publishing this, not the
Washington Times, Harry's favorite paper.


If global warming is nothing but a scam, how come there is SO much
scientific data that it is, indeed occuring?


Because nobody is getting grant money to publish a study that doesn't
support the global warming theory.



The oil/coal companies have deep pockets and are certainly funding that
effort.


....along with the U.S. senator from Oklahoma they own...