Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Oct 27, 5:31*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:

I always liked Little Johnny.

I'm highly offended - highly.

I'm about as offended as I can get.

Outraged you might say.

I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.

You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.

The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.

I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Oct 28, 1:25*am, Tim wrote:
On Oct 27, 5:31*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports



wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:

I always liked Little Johnny.

I'm highly offended - highly.

I'm about as offended as I can get.

Outraged you might say.

I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.

You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.

The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.

I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

No, I'm not just offended. I'm "Out-a-raged!"

Take THAT!

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 27, 5:31*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:

I always liked Little Johnny.

I'm highly offended - highly.

I'm about as offended as I can get.

Outraged you might say.

I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.

You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.

The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.

I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

Well you being offended isn't as serious as my being offended because
I was offended first therefore I have the better grievance in terms of
being offendingly offended by the original offender - offensively
speaking.

And now that I'm offended at your being offended by my being offended
originally offensively speaking, I demand reparations from you for
being offended.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:27:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 28, 1:25*am, Tim wrote:
On Oct 27, 5:31*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports



wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:

I always liked Little Johnny.

I'm highly offended - highly.

I'm about as offended as I can get.

Outraged you might say.

I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.

You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.

The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.

I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

No, I'm not just offended. I'm "Out-a-raged!"

Take THAT!

Being outraged is offensive to me and thus I'm offended at your
outrageously offensive outrage.

I demand an apology.

And reparations.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:12:36 -0400, Jim wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:36:33 -0400, Jim wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:

I always liked Little Johnny.
I'm highly offended - highly.

I'm about as offended as I can get.

Outraged you might say.

I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.
You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.
The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.
Duly noted. I'll see what I can do.

Now I'm even more offended because you didn't offer an immediate
apology and abase yourself as a offender for offending me offensively
in the first place.

I am almost ready to think about making a decision on this matter. But
first I need to consult with esteemed council Plum Krause and White, who
are always ready to offer an opinion.

Their opinion doesn't count. We're talking being a victim here and I
am an offended victim.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

Tim wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:25 am, Tim wrote:
On Oct 27, 5:31 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports



wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:
I always liked Little Johnny.
I'm highly offended - highly.
I'm about as offended as I can get.
Outraged you might say.
I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.
You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.
The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.
Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.
And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.
I demand an apology for offending me offensively.
I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

No, I'm not just offended. I'm "Out-a-raged!"

Take THAT!

What is your M A? I'll send you a bouquet of offend me nots.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 27, 5:31 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:
I always liked Little Johnny.
I'm highly offended - highly.
I'm about as offended as I can get.
Outraged you might say.
I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.
You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.
The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.
I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

Well you being offended isn't as serious as my being offended because
I was offended first therefore I have the better grievance in terms of
being offendingly offended by the original offender - offensively
speaking.

And now that I'm offended at your being offended by my being offended
originally offensively speaking, I demand reparations from you for
being offended.

I just sent him a lovely bouquet of offend me nots. I'll bet you could
get him to share with you.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:25:36 -0400, Jim wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 27, 5:31 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:14:49 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:23:37 -0400, John H.
wrote:
I always liked Little Johnny.
I'm highly offended - highly.
I'm about as offended as I can get.
Outraged you might say.
I demand an immediate retraction and apology for being offended.
You could have the decency to post what has so offended you.
The mere fact that I'm offended is sufficient enough.

Details don't matter - it's simply that I'm offended.

And I'm offended by you daring to ask what offended me.

I demand an apology for offending me offensively.
I'm offended that your offended, Tom.

Well you being offended isn't as serious as my being offended because
I was offended first therefore I have the better grievance in terms of
being offendingly offended by the original offender - offensively
speaking.

And now that I'm offended at your being offended by my being offended
originally offensively speaking, I demand reparations from you for
being offended.

I just sent him a lovely bouquet of offend me nots. I'll bet you could
get him to share with you.

I'm allergic to flower pollen and thus are not only outrageously
outraged at your offensive act of giving flowers but offensively
offended at your offensive offense.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:29:18 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

I just sent him a lovely bouquet of offend me nots. I'll bet you could
get him to share with you.

I'm allergic to flower pollen and thus are not only outrageously
outraged at your offensive act of giving flowers but offensively
offended at your offensive offense.

Wow, things must be slow in eastern CT this time of year. If only
you had bought that trawler your bride wanted, you could be making
plans for going to the islands right now.

Little Johnny - if he offends you, don't open...
 

On Oct 28, 9:31*am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:29:18 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
I just sent him a lovely bouquet of offend me nots. I'll bet you could
get him to share with you.

I'm allergic to flower pollen and thus are not only outrageously
outraged at your offensive act of giving flowers but offensively
offended at your offensive offense.

Wow, things must be slow in eastern CT this time of year. * If only
you had bought that trawler your bride wanted, you could be making
plans for going to the islands right now.

Maybe he can borrow a certain assholes Zimmermann like Lobsta' boat..
He can fix it with the other liars Japanese/German high paid union
labor produced screwdrivers... ;)