On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:58:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


That's one study. Here's another perspective:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/com...y_car_men.html

I gave you a legitimate study and you give me the Washington Post.

Give me a break. Can you understand why the word 'ditzy' comes to
mind?


You only used a portion of the study and it's only one study. I gave you
another opinion. Give _me_ a break. Can you understand why just about
everyone discounts what you say when you continually change identities?

If my author name is giving you a problem, what do you think
nom=de=plum gives? Anonimity is anonimity. You know who I am.

I am King of the Passive-Agressives. Remember? You didn't whine when
the name was called, why whine now?

I gave you the whole study. I quoted only a portion. Should I have
quoted the whole damn thing?

You didn't answer my question.

"KotP-A" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:58:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


That's one study. Here's another perspective:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/com...y_car_men.html

I gave you a legitimate study and you give me the Washington Post.

Give me a break. Can you understand why the word 'ditzy' comes to
mind?


You only used a portion of the study and it's only one study. I gave you
another opinion. Give _me_ a break. Can you understand why just about
everyone discounts what you say when you continually change identities?

If my author name is giving you a problem, what do you think
nom=de=plum gives? Anonimity is anonimity. You know who I am.

I am King of the Passive-Agressives. Remember? You didn't whine when
the name was called, why whine now?

I gave you the whole study. I quoted only a portion. Should I have
quoted the whole damn thing?

You didn't answer my question.


You quoted only a portion. Sorry if you can't admit that there were other
aspects that came to different conclusions.

Still didn't answer the question... why do you continually change
identities? (Clue: has nothing to do with anonymity).

Hmmm... you're "King" of something? Sounds pretty ego-centric to me.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"KotP-A" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:58:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

That's one study. Here's another perspective:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/com...y_car_men.html
I gave you a legitimate study and you give me the Washington Post.

Give me a break. Can you understand why the word 'ditzy' comes to
mind?

You only used a portion of the study and it's only one study. I gave you
another opinion. Give _me_ a break. Can you understand why just about
everyone discounts what you say when you continually change identities?
If my author name is giving you a problem, what do you think
nom=de=plum gives? Anonimity is anonimity. You know who I am.

I am King of the Passive-Agressives. Remember? You didn't whine when
the name was called, why whine now?

I gave you the whole study. I quoted only a portion. Should I have
quoted the whole damn thing?

You didn't answer my question.


You quoted only a portion. Sorry if you can't admit that there were other
aspects that came to different conclusions.

Still didn't answer the question... why do you continually change
identities? (Clue: has nothing to do with anonymity).

Hmmm... you're "King" of something? Sounds pretty ego-centric to me.