Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On 10/8/09 2:28 PM, jps wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html Crikey...backwards assholes. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. Would the women involved be ashamed? Proud? What? |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On Oct 8, 6:10*pm, John H Rant wrote:
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just incubators with tits |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just incubators with tits Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic right could shoot them. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote: On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just incubators with tits Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic right could shoot them. Sick mind you have there krause. How do you live with yourself? |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On Oct 8, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote: On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_.... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? *From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just incubators with tits Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic right could shoot them. yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:01:18 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Oct 8, 7:07*pm, H the K wrote: On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote: On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? *From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just incubators with tits Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic right could shoot them. yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people You have balls, sir. I applaud you. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On 10/8/09 8:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, H the wrote: On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote: On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just incubators with tits Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic right could shoot them. yes, i was a volunteer guard at an abortion clinic when the pro-lifers were gunning down people left and right...frightening group of people Fear...that is what is behind this move in Oklahoma...making women fear for their safety and lives. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On Oct 8, 6:07*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/8/09 6:58 PM, wf3h wrote: On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H *wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, *wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_.... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? *From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are *just incubators with tits Herring, of course, is one of those turds who would cheer if women who had abortions were publicly identified so his compatriots on the lunatic right could shoot them. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Krausie, I thought you were at a Yale class reunion? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oklahoma!!! | General | |||
Oklahoma declares sovereign rights... | General | |||
If celebrities moved to Oklahoma... | General | |||
FS: 1990 18 Ft. Kingfisher in SE Oklahoma | Marketplace | |||
Fatal oklahoma boat crash.... | General |