Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
"wf3h" wrote in message
... On Oct 8, 6:10 pm, John H Rant wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...ion-law-det_n_... What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. of course, from the conservative perspective, women are just incubators with tits Men have no business insisting that a woman have or not have an abortion. No one is in favor of abortion. No one. That's a right-wing, fear-mongering canard. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
"John H Rant" wrote in message
... On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:28:27 -0700, jps wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal: 1) Date of abortion 2) County in which abortion is performed 3) Age of mother 4) Marital status of mother 5) Race of mother 6) Years of education of mother 7) State or foreign country of residence of mother 8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother Proponents of the legislation claim that women should not be concerned over their privacy since no names or "personal information" will be reported. This defense is questionable. Feminists For Choice argues, "In reviewing the actual text of the law, the first 8 questions that will be asked and reported could easily be used to identify any member of a smaller community." The Center For Reproductive Rights, Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton (D-Okla.), and Okla. resident Lora Joyce David have filed a lawsuit to prevent this contentious abortion bill from going into effect, on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_313779.html What difference could it possibly make if the woman was identified? From the liberal perspective, killing babies is no big deal - they're just fetuses, after all. Would the women involved be ashamed? Proud? What? Yeah, you guys have a lot of gall to be friends of the fetus, but when it finally pops out, you're gone. http://www.traditionalmusic.co.uk/fo..._the_Fetus.htm -- Nom=de=Plume |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On Oct 8, 2:28*pm, jps wrote:
A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. ironic in that OK ranks 50th in health care quality: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Char...card-2009.aspx just ahead of the right wing paradise of TX... |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Knuckle draggers love Oklahoma
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:59:45 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Oct 8, 2:28*pm, jps wrote: A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women's abortions to the State's Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain. ironic in that OK ranks 50th in health care quality: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Char...card-2009.aspx just ahead of the right wing paradise of TX... Fantastic. Too bad good folks have to suffer through what the idiots put in place. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oklahoma!!! | General | |||
Oklahoma declares sovereign rights... | General | |||
If celebrities moved to Oklahoma... | General | |||
FS: 1990 18 Ft. Kingfisher in SE Oklahoma | Marketplace | |||
Fatal oklahoma boat crash.... | General |